Dataset Information

Systematic and Random Mapping Errors in Structure - Function Analysis of the Macula.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Quantify the spatial error in mapping perimetric stimuli for structure-function analysis resulting from the choice of mapping scheme and eye movements.

Methods

We analyzed data from 17 healthy and 30 glaucomatous participants. Structural data of the macula were collected with a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. We extracted eye movement data and projection locations from a fundus tracking perimeter and quantified the retinal location mapping error (distance between the actual and the intended stimulus location in degrees from the fovea) for non-tracked perimetry in a 10-2 grid. First, we evaluated whether rotating the 10-2 grid to match the fovea-disc axis improved mapping accuracy. Second, we analyzed the effect of eccentric fixation, random eye movements, and gaze attraction from seen stimuli on projection accuracy and spread of fixation, measured with the 95% bivariate contour ellipse area (95% BCEA). We used generalized linear mixed models for our statistical analyses.

Results

Rotating the 10-2 grid to match the fovea-disc axis significantly increased the mapping error (P < 0.001). Eye movements evoked by seen stimuli significantly increased the projection error during the test (P < 0.001). Removing such eye movements significantly reduced the 95% BCEA (P < 0.001). Eccentric fixation also significantly contributed to the projection error (P < 0.001), and its effect was larger in glaucoma patients (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Rotating the perimetric grid to match the fovea-disc axis is not recommended. Fixation eccentricity and instability should be taken into account for structure-function analyses.

Translational relevance

Accounting for fixation can improve structure-function mapping in glaucoma.

SUBMITTER: Montesano G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7900880 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:While the importance of random sequencing errors decreases at higher DNA or RNA sequencing depths, systematic sequencing errors (SSEs) dominate at high sequencing depths and can be difficult to distinguish from biological variants. These SSEs can cause base quality scores to underestimate the probability of error at certain genomic positions, resulting in false positive variant calls, particularly in mixtures such as samples with RNA editing, tumors, circulating tumor cells, bacteria, mitochondrial heteroplasmy, or pooled DNA. Most algorithms proposed for correction of SSEs require a training data set, which is typically either from a part of the data set being M-bM-^@M-^\recalibratedM-bM-^@M-^] (Genome Analysis ToolKit, or GATK) or from a separate data set with special characteristics (SysCall). Here, we combine the advantages of these approaches by adding synthetic RNA spike-in standards to human RNA, and use GATK to recalibrate base quality scores with reads mapped to the spike-in standards. Compared to conventional GATK recalibration that uses reads mapped to the genome, spike-ins improve the accuracy of Illumina base quality scores by a mean of 5 units, and by as much as 13 units M-BM- at CpG sites. In addition, since reads mapping to the genome are not used for recalibration, our method allows run-specific recalibration even for the many species without a comprehensive and accurate SNP database. We also use GATK with the spike-in standards to demonstrate that the Illumina RNA sequencing runs overestimate quality scores for AC, CC, GC, GG, and TC dinucleotides, while SOLiD has less dinucleotide SSEs but more SSEs for certain cycles. We conclude that using these DNA and RNA spike-in standards with GATK improves base quality score recalibration. Four human RNA samples with equimolar ERCC spike-in standards were sequenced on Illumina. Two human brain/liver/muscle RNA mixtures with dynamic range of ERCC spike-in standards were sequenced on SOLiD.