Rituximab vs Low-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil in Recurrence of Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome in Children and Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ravani P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7900932 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Rituximab vs Low-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil in Recurrence of Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome in Children and Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ravani Pietro P Lugani Francesca F Drovandi Stefania S Caridi Gianluca G Angeletti Andrea A Ghiggeri Gian Marco GM
JAMA pediatrics 20210601 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundRituximab is the standard therapy for childhood-onset complicated frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). However, most patients redevelop FRNS/SDNS after peripheral B cell recovery.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to examine whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) administration after rituximab can prevent treatment failure (FRNS, SDNS, steroid resistance, or use of immunosuppressive agents or rituximab). In total, 39 patients (per group) were treated with rituximab, followed by either MMF or placebo until day 505 (treatment period). The primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF) throughout the treatment and follow-up periods (until day 505 for the last enrolled patient).ResultsTTFs were clinically but not statistically significantly longer among patients given MMF after rituximab than among patients receiving rituximab monotherapy (median, 784.0 versus 472.5 days, hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34 to 1.05, log-rank test: P=0.07). Because most patients in the MMF group presented with treatment failure after MMF discontinuation, we performed a post-hoc analysis limited to the treatment period and found that MMF after rituximab prolonged the TTF and decreased the risk of treatment failure by 80% (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.50). Moreover, MMF after rituximab reduced the relapse rate and daily steroid dose during the treatment period by 74% and 57%, respectively. The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups.ConclusionsAdministration of MMF after rituximab may sufficiently prevent the development of treatment failure and is well tolerated, although the relapse-preventing effect disappears after MMF discontinuation.
| S-EPMC8819987 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionGlucocorticoids induce remission in 90% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). Some become steroid-dependent (SD) and require the addition of steroid sparing drugs such as calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) or cyclophosphamide, to maintain remission. Considering the toxicity of these drugs, alternative interventions are needed for long-term treatment. The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has shown promising steroid-sparing properties, with conflicting results in complicated forms of SD-INS. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) resulted effective in maintaining free-steroid remission, however, studies are limited to few uncontrolled trials with reported different dose of MMF.Methods and analysisThis open-label, two-parallel-arm, superiority controlled randomised clinical trial will enrol children with SD-INS maintained in remission with oral glucocorticoids or CNI. Children and young adults will be randomised to either MMF (1.200 mg/m2) or rituximab (375 mg/m2) infusion. After enrolment, glucocorticoids will be tapered until complete withdrawal. We will enrol 160 children and young adults to detect as significant at the two-sided p value of 0.01 with a power >0.8 a reduction in the risk of 1-year relapse (primary end-point). As secondary endpoints, we will compare the amount of glucocorticoids required to maintain complete remission at 6 and 24 months.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the local ethics boards (Comitato Etico Regione Liguria CER Liguria https://www.portalericerca-liguria.it/). We will publish the study results at international scientific meetings.Trial registration numbersNCT004585152.
| S-EPMC8634023 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundApproximately 30% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome develop a complicated course with frequent relapses or steroid dependency. Rituximab, a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is a safe and effective alternative to steroids or other immunosuppressants for achieving and maintaining remission in this population at short term. Despite the good initial response relapses inevitably occur after regeneration of B lymphocytes, necessitating either repeat courses of rituximab or addition of another steroid-sparing immunosuppressant.MethodsThis is a prospective, single-center, open-label, two-parallel-arm randomized controlled phase III study among children with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome who are maintained in remission with oral steroids. One hundred children will be randomized to either Rituximab and maintenance Mycophenolate mofetil (A) or repeated courses of prophylactic Rituximab only (B). In arm A, mycophenolate mofetil (1200 mg/m2 per day) will be started 3 months after Rituximab administration. In arm B, Rituximab infusions will be administered at 0, 8 and 16 months if B cell count normalize at the given time points. Prednisolone will be discontinued in both groups 2 weeks following first course of rituximab. Primary aim is to evaluate the difference in 24-month relapse-free survival. Main secondary endpoints are cumulative prednisolone dose, frequency of relapses and changes in anthropometry. Circulating B lymphocyte populations will be studied as biomarkers or predictors of rituximab responsiveness and adverse events will be analysed.DiscussionThe study will provide evidence as to the comparative safety and efficacy of two alternative steroid-sparing therapeutic options in children suffering from steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome. The two-year study design will address the long-term results obtained with the alternative treatment protocols.Trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered to the Clinicaltrial.gov ( NCT03899103 dated 02/04/2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ) and Clinical Trials Registry of India ( CTRI/2019/04/018517 dated 09/04/2019).
| S-EPMC7706288 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceThere is an increasing body of literature that supports the use of rituximab as a first-line steroid-sparing agent in pemphigus vulgaris. However, the cost of rituximab is substantial compared with conventional agents, and there are limited health economic data to justify its use.ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars relative to mycophenolate mofetil as a first-line steroid-sparing agent for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris.Design, setting, and participantsA cost-utility analysis over a 24-month time horizon was conducted from the perspective of the Australian health care sector using a modeled cohort of treatment-naive adult patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. A Markov cohort model was constructed to simulate disease progression following first-line treatment with rituximab biosimilars or mycophenolate mofetil. The simulated cohort transitioned between controlled disease, uncontrolled disease, and death. Efficacy and utility data were obtained from available published literature. Cost data were primarily obtained from published government data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. Primary outcomes were the changes in cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over the 24 months.InterventionsRituximab biosimilars and mycophenolate mofetil.ResultsThe simulated cohort of treatment-naive patients had a mean age of 50.8 years, a female-to-male ratio of 1.24, and moderate to severe disease as classified by the Harman criteria. First-line rituximab biosimilars were associated with a cost reduction of AU$639 and an improvement of 0.07 QALYs compared with mycophenolate mofetil, resulting in an ICER of -AU$8818/QALY. Rituximab biosimilars were therefore more effective and less costly compared with mycophenolate mofetil. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that rituximab biosimilars remained cost-effective across a range of values for cost, utility, and transition probability input parameters and willingness-to-pay thresholds.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cost-utility analysis, rituximab biosimilars were cost-effective compared with mycophenolate mofetil for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Further investigation into its cost-effectiveness over a longer time horizon is necessary, but the favorable results of this study suggest that the high acquisition costs of rituximab biosimilars may be offset by its effectiveness and provide economic evidence in support of its listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for pemphigus vulgaris.
| S-EPMC9330276 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Rationale & objectiveHigh-dose steroids are recommended for the induction of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare standard induction therapy with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF). We hypothesized that MMF could be noninferior to steroids in maintaining steroid-induced remission. The second aim was to reduce steroid-induced side effects.Study designThis was an observational study.Setting & populationPatients 2-11 years with first episode of nephrotic syndrome who entered remission within 2 weeks of standard steroid treatment were eligible for enrollment. Patients in the experimental group completed 12-week induction with MMF, whereas the control group continued a standard 12-week steroid protocol.ExposuresMMF and prednisolone were used in the study.OutcomesThe primary study outcomes were relapse rate and relapse-free interval during a 52-week follow-up.Analytical approachDescriptive statistics were used for analysis.ResultsTen of 41 eligible patients consented to participate in the MMF group and 8 completed the study. The control group included 31 patients, with 23 patients who completed 52 weeks follow-up. During the induction phase, 3 out of 10 patients (30%) in the MMF group and 1 out of 31 (3%) in the control group (P = 0.04) developed relapse. During the 52 weeks follow-up period, 7 out of 10 patients (70%) in the MMF group and 19 out of 31 (61%) in the control group developed relapse (P = 0.72). The median relapse-free interval was 11 and 19 weeks in MMF and control groups, respectively (P = 0.60). No serious side effects were recorded in either group.LimitationsThe limitations of the study were low patient numbers receiving MMF and single-center design.ConclusionsOur small cohort of patients treated with MMF reported a higher relapse rate during the induction phase. However, by 12 months of follow-up the relapse rate and relapse-free intervals were similar between both groups. All patients tolerated MMF without significant side effects, and those who relapsed remained steroid-sensitive.
| S-EPMC10904994 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe compared protection of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) against acute cellular rejection (ACR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion maintenance immunosuppression.Methods and findingsATHENA, a pragmatic, prospective, multicenter trial conducted by 6 Italian transplant centers, compared the outcomes of 233 consenting recipients of a first deceased donor kidney transplant induced with low-dose thymoglobulin and basiliximab and randomized to MMF (750 mg twice/day, n = 119) or AZA (75 to 125 mg/day, n = 114) added-on maintenance low-dose CsA microemulsion and 1-week steroid. In patients without acute clinical or subclinical rejections, CsA dose was progressively halved. Primary endpoint was biopsy-proven CAN. Analysis was by intention to treat. Participants were included between June 2007 and July 2012 and followed up to August 2016. Between-group donor and recipient characteristics, donor/recipient mismatches, and follow-up CsA blood levels were similar. During a median (interquartile range (IQR)) follow-up of 47.7 (44.2 to 48.9) months, 29 of 87 biopsied patients on MMF (33.3%) versus 31 of 88 on AZA (35.2%) developed CAN (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.147 (0.691 to 1.904, p = 0.595). Twenty and 21 patients on MMF versus 34 and 14 on AZA had clinical [HR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.34 to 1.02); p = 0.057) or biopsy-proven subclinical [HR (95% CI): 1.49 (0.76 to 2.92); p = 0.249] ACR, respectively. Combined events [HR (95% CI): 0.85 (0.56 to 1.29); p = 0.438], patient and graft survival, delayed graft function (DGF), 3-year glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [53.8 (40.6;65.7) versus 49.8 (36.8;62.5) mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.50], and adverse events (AEs) were not significantly different between groups. Chronicity scores other than CAN predict long-term graft outcome. Study limitations include small sample size and unblinded design.ConclusionsIn this study, we found that in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients on low-dose CsA and no steroids, MMF had no significant benefits over AZA. This finding suggests that AZA, due to its lower costs, could safely replace MMF in combination with minimized immunosuppression.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00494741; EUDRACT 2006-005604-14.
| S-EPMC8224852 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Drug resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (DRNS) remains a therapeutic dilemma. In this pilot study, the efficacy of the new fully humanised, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab was tested in 4 children with persistence of proteinuria for at least 12 months in spite of a full drug approach (including rituximab). We used a low-dose 2-infusion ofatumumab model (300+700 mg/1.73 m(2) 2 weeks apart) using specified premedication. Transient normalisation of proteinuria (persisting for 2 months) was achieved in 1 child while another presented stable remission after 12 months; both had normal renal function. The outcome was not modified in the remaining 2 children presenting an impaired renal function. These results demonstrate that low-dose ofatumumab may induce remittance of proteinuria in children with a long story of DRNS and normal renal function. Further studies are needed to test whether higher doses of ofatumumab can also modify proteinuria in patients with impaired renal function.
| S-EPMC4577716 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), the cornerstone of immunosuppression after transplantation are implicated in nephrotoxicity and allograft dysfunction. We hypothesized that combined low doses of CNI and Everolimus (EVR) may result in better graft outcomes and greater tolerogenic milieu. Forty adult renal transplant recipients were prospectively randomized to (steroid free) low dose Tacrolimus (TAC) and EVR or standard dose TAC and Mycophenolate (MMF) after Alemtuzumab induction. Baseline characteristics were statistically similar. EVR levels were maintained at 3-8 ng/ml. TAC levels were 4.5±1.9 and 6.4±1.5 ng/ml in the TAC+EVR and TAC+MMF group respectively. Follow up was 14±4 and 17±5 months respectively and included protocol kidney biopsies at 3 and 12 months post-transplantation. Rejection-rate was lower in the TAC+EVR group. However patient and overall graft survival, eGFR and incidence of adverse events were similar. TAC+EVR induced expansion of CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ regulatory T cells as early as 3 months and expansion of IFN-γ+CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ regulatory T cells at 12 months post-transplant. Gene expression profile showed a trend toward decreased inflammation, angiogenesis and connective tissue growth in the TAC+EVR Group. Thus, greater tolerogenic mechanisms were found to be operating in patients with low dose TAC+EVR and this might be responsible for the lower rejection-rate than in patients on standard dose TAC+MMF. However, further studies with longer follow up and evaluating impact on T regulatory cells are warranted.
| S-EPMC6538151 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The severe side effects of long-term corticosteroid or cyclosporin A (CsA) therapy complicate the treatment of children with frequently relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (FR-SSNS). We conducted a randomized, multicenter, open-label, crossover study comparing the efficacy and safety of a 1-year treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; target plasma mycophenolic acid trough level of 1.5-2.5 µg/ml) or CsA (target trough level of 80-100 ng/ml) in 60 pediatric patients with FR-SSNS. We assessed the frequency of relapse as the primary endpoint and evaluated pharmacokinetic profiles (area under the curve [AUC]) after 3 and 6 months of treatment. More relapses per patient per year occurred with MMF than with CsA during the first year (P=0.03), but not during the second year (P=0.14). No relapses occurred in 85% of patients during CsA therapy and in 64% of patients during MMF therapy (P=0.06). However, the time without relapse was significantly longer with CsA than with MMF during the first year (P<0.05), but not during the second year (P=0.36). In post hoc analysis, patients with low mycophenolic acid exposure (AUC <50 µg⋅h/ml) experienced 1.4 relapses per year compared with 0.27 relapses per year in those with high exposure (AUC>50 µg⋅h/ml; P<0.05). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to BP, growth, lipid levels, or adverse events. However, cystatin clearance, estimated GFR, and hemoglobin levels increased significantly with MMF compared with CsA. These results indicate that MMF is inferior to CsA in preventing relapses in pediatric patients with FR-SSNS, but may be a less nephrotoxic treatment option.
| S-EPMC3785276 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10831348 | biostudies-literature