Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
Methods: The analysis included men (aged ?15 years) who received care during 2010-2017 in 3 clinical practice groups. We calculated annual percentages of men with ?1 gonorrhea test and men with ?1 positive result, among men tested. Log-binomial regression models were used to examine trends in these outcomes. We adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics that may influence the predilection to test and probability of gonorrhea disease.
Results: On average, 306 348 men had clinical encounters each year. There was a significant increase in men with ?1 gonorrhea test from 2010 (3.1%) to 2017 (6.4%; adjusted annual risk ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.13). There was a significant, albeit lesser, increase in the percentage of tested men with ?1 positive result (1.0% in 2010 to 1.5% in 2017; adjusted annual risk ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.09).
Conclusions: We estimated significant increases in the annual percentages of men with ?1 gonorrhea test and men with ?1 positive gonorrhea test result between 2010 and 2017. These results suggest that observed increases in gonorrhea rates could be explained by both increases in screening and the prevalence of gonorrhea.
SUBMITTER: Willis SJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7904080 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Willis Sarah J SJ Elder Heather H Cocoros Noelle N Young Jessica J Marcus Julia L JL Eberhardt Karen K Callahan Myfanwy M Herrick Brian B Weiss Michelle M Hafer Ellen E Erani Diana D Josephson Mark M Llata Eloisa E Flagg Elaine W EW Hsu Katherine K KK Klompas Michael M
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20201201 9
<h4>Background</h4>Gonorrhea diagnosis rates in the United States increased by 75% during 2009-2017, predominantly in men. It is unclear whether the increase among men is being driven by more screening, an increase in the prevalence of disease, or both. We sought to evaluate changes in gonorrhea testing patterns and positivity among men in Massachusetts.<h4>Methods</h4>The analysis included men (aged ≥15 years) who received care during 2010-2017 in 3 clinical practice groups. We calculated annua ...[more]