Dataset Information

The Kickstart Walk Assist System for improving balance and walking function in stroke survivors: a feasibility study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Compared with traditional physical therapy for stroke patients, lower extremity exoskeletons can provide patients with greater endurance and more repeatable and controllable training, which can reduce the therapeutic burden of the therapist. However, most exoskeletons are expensive, heavy or require active power to be operated. Therefore, a lighter, easy to wear, easy to operate, low-cost technology for stroke rehabilitation would be a welcome opportunity for stroke survivors, caregivers and clinicians. One such device is the Kickstart Walk Assist system and the purpose of this study was to determine feasibility of using this unpowered exoskeleton device in a sample of stroke survivors.

Methods

Thirty stroke survivors were enrolled in the study and experienced walking with the Kickstart exoskeleton device that provided spring-loaded assistance during gait. After 5 days of wearing the exoskeleton, participants were evaluated in the two states of wearing and not wearing the exoskeleton. Outcome measures included: (a) spatio-temporal gait measures, (b) balance measures and (c) exoskeleton-use feedback questionnaire.

Results

In comparison to not wearing the device, when participants wore the Kickstart walking system, weight bearing asymmetry was reduced. The time spent on the 10-m walk test was also reduced, but there was no difference in the timed-up-and-go test (TUGT). Gait analysis data showed reduction in step time and double support time. Stroke survivors were positive about the Kickstart walking system's ability to improve their balance, speed and gait. In addition, their confidence level and willingness to use the device was also positive.

Conclusions

These findings show the feasibility of using the Kickstart walking system for improving walking performance in stroke survivors. Our future goal is to perform a longer duration study with more comprehensive pre- and post-testing in a larger sample of stroke survivors. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000032665. Registered 5 May 2020-Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=53288.

SUBMITTER: Yao J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7905648 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Kickstart Walk Assist System for improving balance and walking function in stroke survivors: a feasibility study.

Yao Jiajia J Sado Takashi T Wang Wenli W Gao Jiawen J Zhao Yichao Y Qi Qi Q Mukherjee Mukul M

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 20210224 1

<h4>Background</h4>Compared with traditional physical therapy for stroke patients, lower extremity exoskeletons can provide patients with greater endurance and more repeatable and controllable training, which can reduce the therapeutic burden of the therapist. However, most exoskeletons are expensive, heavy or require active power to be operated. Therefore, a lighter, easy to wear, easy to operate, low-cost technology for stroke rehabilitation would be a welcome opportunity for stroke survivors, ...[more]

PMID: 33627142

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBalance and walking impairment are common dysfunctions after stroke. Emerging data has demonstrated that hydrokinesitherapy may have a positive influence on improvement of balance and walking ability. However, there is no firm evidence to support these results. Therefore, the aim of this review is to evaluate the effects of hydrokinesitherapy in stroke survivors systematically.MethodsMedline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were systemic searched from their inception to Septemter 30, 2018. RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform data synthesis. The fixed-effect model or random-effect model was employed according to the results of heterogeneity test. The mean differences (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to evaluate the pooled effect of hydrokinesitherapy on balance function, walking ability and activty of daily life (ADL).ResultsA total of 13 studies were included involving 381 stroke survivors. Meta-analysis results indicated that hydrokinesitherapy could improve balance ability based on three test: Berg balance scale (BBS: MD?=?3.84, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.84 to 4.86, P?<?0.001), Time Up To Go Test (TUGT: MD?=?-?1.22, 95% CI -?2.25 to -?0.18, P?=?0.02, fixed-effect model), Functional Reach Test (FRT: MD?=?2.41, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.33, P?<?0.001). Additionally, we found a weakly positive effect on walking speed (SMD?=?0.75, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.25, P?=?0.003) and walking ability test (SMD?=?0.36, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.68, P?=?0.03). There was no significant difference between experimental group and control group in terms of ADL.Short conclusionHydrokinesitherapy can improve balance function and had a weakly positive effect on walking ability in stroke survivors. We did not find sufficient evidence to indicate that hydrokinesitherapy could improve the ADL of stroke survivors. However, due to the methodological shortcoming and small number of included studies, caution is needed when interpreting these results. Due to imprecision and publication bias, the quality of the evidence was downgraded to "low-quality" for the primary outcomes of balance and walking ability.Trial registrationCRD42018110787.

Project description:RationaleClinical practice guidelines support structured, progressive protocols for improving walking after stroke. Yet, practice is slow to change, evidenced by the little amount of walking activity in stroke rehabilitation units. Our recent study (n = 75) found that a structured, progressive protocol integrated with typical daily physical therapy improved walking and quality-of-life measures over usual care. Research therapists progressed the intensity of exercise by using heart rate and step counters worn by the participants with stroke during therapy. To have the greatest impact, our next step is to undertake an implementation trial to change practice across stroke units where we enable the entire unit to use the protocol as part of standard of care.AimsWhat is the effect of introducing structured, progressive exercise (termed the Walk 'n Watch protocol) to the standard of care on the primary outcome of walking in adult participants with stroke over the hospital inpatient rehabilitation period? Secondary outcomes will be evaluated and include quality of life.Methods and sample size estimatesThis national, multisite clinical trial will randomize 12 sites using a stepped-wedge design where each site will be randomized to deliver Usual Care initially for 4, 8, 12, or 16 months (three sites for each duration). Then, each site will switch to the Walk 'n Watch phase for the remaining duration of a total 20-month enrolment period. Each participant will be exposed to either Usual Care or Walk 'n Watch. The trial will enroll a total of 195 participants with stroke to achieve a power of 80% with a Type I error rate of 5%, allowing for 20% dropout. Participants will be medically stable adults post-stroke and able to take five steps with a maximum physical assistance from one therapist. The Walk 'n Watch protocol focuses on completing a minimum of 30 min of weight-bearing, walking-related activities (at the physical therapists' discretion) that progressively increase in intensity informed by activity trackers measuring heart rate and step number.Study outcome(s)The primary outcome will be the change in walking endurance, measured by the 6-Minute Walk Test, from baseline (T1) to 4 weeks (T2). This change will be compared across Usual Care and Walk 'n Watch phases using a linear mixed-effects model. Additional physical, cognitive, and quality of life outcomes will be measured at T1, T2, and 12 months post-stroke (T3) by a blinded assessor.DiscussionThe implementation of stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial enables the protocol to be tested under real-world conditions, involving all clinicians on the unit. It will result in all sites and all clinicians on the unit to gain expertise in protocol delivery. Hence, a deliberate outcome of the trial is facilitating changes in best practice to improve outcomes for participants with stroke in the trial and for the many participants with stroke admitted after the trial ends.

Project description:BACKGROUND:For stroke survivors, balance deficits that persist after the completion of the rehabilitation process lead to a significant risk of falls. We have recently developed a balance-assessment robot (BAR-TM) that enables assessment of balancing abilities during walking. The purpose of this study was to test feasibility of using the BAR-TM in an experimental perturbed-balance training program with a selected high-functioning stroke survivor. METHODS:A control and an individual with right-side chronic hemiparesis post-stroke were studied. The individual post-stroke underwent thirty sessions of balance-perturbed training that involved walking on an instrumented treadmill while the BAR-TM delivered random pushes to the participant's pelvis; these pushes were in various directions, at various speeds, and had various perturbation amplitudes. We assessed kinematics, kinetics, electromyography, and spatio-temporal responses to outward-directed perturbations of amplitude 60 N (before training) and 60 N and 90 N (after training) commencing on contact of either the nonparetic-left foot (LL-NP/L perturbation) or the paretic-right foot (RR-P/R perturbation) while the treadmill was running at a speed of 0.4 m/s. RESULTS:Before training, the individual post-stroke primarily responded to LL-NP/L perturbations with an in-stance response on the non-paretic leg in a similar way to the control participant. After training, the individual post-stroke added adequate stepping by making a cross-step with the paretic leg that enabled successful rejection of the perturbation at lower and higher amplitudes. Before training, the individual post-stroke primarily responded to RR-P/R perturbations with fast cross-stepping using the left, non-paretic leg while in-stance response was entirely missing. After training, the stepping with the non-paretic leg was supplemented by partially recovered ability to exercise in-stance responses on the paretic leg and this enabled successful rejection of the perturbation at lower and higher amplitudes. The assessed kinematics, kinetics, electromyography, and spatio-temporal responses provided insight into the relative share of each balancing strategy that the selected individual post-stroke used to counteract LL-NP/L and RR-P/R perturbations before and after the training. CONCLUSIONS:The main finding of this case-control study is that robot-based perturbed-balance training may be a feasible approach. It resulted in an improvement the selected post-stroke participant's ability to counteract outward-directed perturbations. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03285919 - retrospectively registered.

Project description:Muscle coordination is often impaired after stroke, leading to deficits in the control of walking and balance. In this study, we examined features of muscle coordination associated with reduced walking performance in chronic stroke survivors using motor module (a.k.a. muscle synergy) analysis. We identified differences between stroke survivors and age-similar neurotypical controls in the modular control of both overground walking and standing reactive balance. In contrast to previous studies that demonstrated reduced motor module number poststroke, our cohort of stroke survivors did not exhibit a reduction in motor module number compared with controls during either walking or reactive balance. Instead, the pool of motor modules common to walking and reactive balance was smaller, suggesting reduced generalizability of motor module function across behaviors. The motor modules common to walking and reactive balance tended to be less variable and more distinct, suggesting more reliable output compared with motor modules specific to either behavior. Greater motor module generalization in stroke survivors was associated with faster walking speed, more normal step length asymmetry, and narrower step widths. Our work is the first to show that motor module generalization across walking and balance may help to distinguish important and clinically relevant differences in walking performance across stroke survivors that would have been overlooked by examining only a single behavior. Finally, because similar relationships between motor module generalization and walking performance have been demonstrated in healthy young adults and individuals with Parkinson's disease, this suggests that motor module generalization across walking and balance may be important for well-coordinated walking. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first work to simultaneously examine neuromuscular control of walking and standing reactive balance in stroke survivors. We show that motor module generalization across these behaviors (i.e., recruiting common motor modules) is reduced compared with controls and is associated with slower walking speeds, asymmetric step lengths, and larger step widths. This is true despite no between-group differences in module number, suggesting that motor module generalization across walking and balance is important for well-coordinated walking.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Treadmill training, with or without body-weight support (BWSTT), typically involves high step count, faster walking speed, and higher heart-rate intensity than overground walking training. The addition of challenging mobility skill practice may offer increased opportunities to improve walking and balance skills. Here we compare walking and balance outcomes of chronic stroke survivors performing BWSTT with BWSTT including challenging mobility skills. METHODS:Single-blind randomized clinical trial comparing two BWSTT interventions performed in a rehabilitation research laboratory facility over 6 weeks. Participants were 18+ years of age with chronic (?5 months) poststroke hemiparesis due to a cortical or subcortical ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and walking speeds <?1.1 m/s at baseline. A hands-free group (HF; n?=?15) performed BWSTT without assistance from handrails or assistive devices, and a hands-free plus challenge group (HF?+?C; n?=?14) performed the same protocol while additionally practicing challenging mobility skills. The primary outcome was change in comfortable walking speed (CWS), with secondary outcomes of fast walk speed (FWS), six-minute walk distance, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores, and Activities Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scores. RESULTS:Significant pre-post improvement of CWS (Z?=?-?4.2, p???0.0001) from a median of 0.35 m/s (range 0.10 to 1.09) to a median of 0.54 m/s (range 0.1 to 1.17), but no difference observed between groups (U?=?96.0, p?=?0.69). Pre-post improvements across all participants resulted in reclassified baseline ambulation status from sixteen to ten household ambulators, three to seven limited community ambulators, and ten to twelve community ambulators. Secondary outcomes showed similar pre-post improvements with no between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS:The addition of challenging mobility skills to a hands-free BWSTT protocol did not lead to greater improvements in CWS following 6 weeks of training. One reason for lack of group differences may be that both groups were adequately challenged by walking in an active, self-driven treadmill environment without use of handrails or assistive devices. TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT02787759 Falls-based Training for Walking Post-Stroke (FBT); retrospectively registered June 1st, 2016.

Dataset Information

The Kickstart Walk Assist System for improving balance and walking function in stroke survivors: a feasibility study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Kickstart Walk Assist System for improving balance and walking function in stroke survivors: a feasibility study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets