Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Pain is a devastating sensation and has to be treated immediately. Therefore, we developed a training program to improve the knowledge of medical students in the field of pain medicine. In the present study, the applicability and efficacy of this training program was tested.Methods
Half of the students attended first a training with simulated patients (SP) followed by bedside teaching (Group 1). Group 2 performed the training programs in reverse order. The evaluation based on standardized questionnaires completed by students (self-assessment) and all students took part in two practical examinations after the learning interventions.Results
This study included 35 students. The quality of the simulation was evaluated by the students with average grade 1.1 (1?=?very good, 6?=?very bad). The practical work on the ward with patients was rated with grade 1.4 of 6, the whole course with 1.1. Students of Group A were significantly better in the final examination (grade 1.7 vs. grade 2.2, p?ConclusionsTraining with simulated patients in combination with small-group teaching at the bedside with real patients achieves a dramatic increase in student competence. Students prefer learning from the simulation before bedside teaching and propose to include simulation into the curricular teaching of pain medicine.
SUBMITTER: Kurz S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7905916 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Kurz Sandra S Lohse Jana J Buggenhagen Holger H Schmidtmann Irene I Laufenberg-Feldmann Rita R Engelhard Kristin K
BMC medical education 20210225 1
<h4>Background</h4>Pain is a devastating sensation and has to be treated immediately. Therefore, we developed a training program to improve the knowledge of medical students in the field of pain medicine. In the present study, the applicability and efficacy of this training program was tested.<h4>Methods</h4>Half of the students attended first a training with simulated patients (SP) followed by bedside teaching (Group 1). Group 2 performed the training programs in reverse order. The evaluation b ...[more]