Dataset Information

Value of dynamic contrast perfusion MRI to predict early response to bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results from ACRIN 6686 multicenter trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0825, a phase III trial of standard therapy with bevacizumab or without (placebo) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, 44 patients underwent dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and/or dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) trial 6686. The association between early changes in relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and volume transfer constant (Ktrans) with overall survival (OS) was evaluated.

Methods

MRI was performed at postop baseline (S0), immediately before (S1), 1 day after (S2), and 7 weeks after (S3) bevacizumab or placebo initiation. Mean normalized and standardized rCBV (nRCBV, sRCBV) and Ktrans were measured within contrast-enhancing lesion. Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared parameter changes from S1-S2 and S1-S3. Association with OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Treatment response for groups stratified by pretreatment nRCBV (S0, S1) was explored. The intraclass correlation coefficient and repeatability coefficient for the placebo arm (S1-S2) were used to assess repeatability.

Results

Evaluable were 27-36 datasets per time point. Significant differences between treatment arms were found for changes in nRCBV and sRCBV from S1-S2 and S1-S3, and in Ktrans for S1-S3. Improved PFS (P = 0.05) but not OS (P = 0.46) was observed. High pretreatment rCBV predicted improved OS for bevacizumab-treated patients. Based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, sRCBV (0.92) was more repeatable than nRCBV (0.71) and Ktrans (0.75), consistent with repeatability coefficient values.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab significantly changes rCBV but not Ktrans as early as 1 day posttreatment in newly diagnosed glioblastoma unrelated to outcomes. Improvements in clinical trial design to maximize rCBV benefit are indicated.

SUBMITTER: Schmainda KM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7906067 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose To evaluate factors contributing to interreader variation (IRV) in parameters measured at dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MRI in patients with glioblastoma who were participating in a multicenter trial. Materials and Methods A total of 18 patients (mean age, 57 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 10 men) who volunteered for the advanced imaging arm of ACRIN 6677, a substudy of the RTOG 0625 clinical trial for recurrent glioblastoma treatment, underwent analyzable DCE MRI at one of four centers. The 78 imaging studies were analyzed centrally to derive the volume transfer constant (Ktrans) for gadolinium between blood plasma and tissue extravascular extracellular space, fractional volume of the extracellular extravascular space (ve), and initial area under the gadolinium concentration curve (IAUGC). Two independently trained teams consisting of a neuroradiologist and a technologist segmented the enhancing tumor on three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady-state images. Mean and median parameter values in the enhancing tumor were extracted after registering segmentations to parameter maps. The effect of imaging time relative to treatment, map quality, imager magnet and sequence, average tumor volume, and reader variability in tumor volume on IRV was studied by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and linear mixed models. Results Mean interreader variations (± standard deviation) (difference as a percentage of the mean) for mean and median IAUGC, mean and median Ktrans, and median ve were 18% ± 24, 17% ± 23, 27% ± 34, 16% ± 27, and 27% ± 34, respectively. ICCs for these metrics ranged from 0.90 to 1.0 for baseline and from 0.48 to 0.76 for posttreatment examinations. Variability in reader-derived tumor volume was significantly related to IRV for all parameters. Conclusion Differences in reader tumor segmentations are a significant source of interreader variation for all dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Wolf in this issue.

Project description:BackgroundConcurrent treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy followed by maintenance temozolomide is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A, is currently approved for recurrent glioblastoma. Whether the addition of bevacizumab would improve survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is not known.MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we treated adults who had centrally confirmed glioblastoma with radiotherapy (60 Gy) and daily temozolomide. Treatment with bevacizumab or placebo began during week 4 of radiotherapy and was continued for up to 12 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. At disease progression, the assigned treatment was revealed, and bevacizumab therapy could be initiated or continued. The trial was designed to detect a 25% reduction in the risk of death and a 30% reduction in the risk of progression or death, the two coprimary end points, with the addition of bevacizumab.ResultsA total of 978 patients were registered, and 637 underwent randomization. There was no significant difference in the duration of overall survival between the bevacizumab group and the placebo group (median, 15.7 and 16.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio for death in the bevacizumab group, 1.13). Progression-free survival was longer in the bevacizumab group (10.7 months vs. 7.3 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.79). There were modest increases in rates of hypertension, thromboembolic events, intestinal perforation, and neutropenia in the bevacizumab group. Over time, an increased symptom burden, a worse quality of life, and a decline in neurocognitive function were more frequent in the bevacizumab group.ConclusionsFirst-line use of bevacizumab did not improve overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Progression-free survival was prolonged but did not reach the prespecified improvement target. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00884741.).

Project description:PurposeBevacizumab is associated with decreased vascular permeability that allows for more aggressive radiotherapy schedules. We conducted a phase II trial in newly diagnosed glioblastoma utilizing a novel hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) schedule combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab.Experimental designPatients with tumor volume ≤60 cc were treated with HFSRT (6 × 6 Gy to contrast enhancement and 6 × 4 Gy to FLAIR hyperintensity with dose painting) combined with concomitant/adjuvant temozolomide and bevacizumab at standard doses. Primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS): promising = 70%; nonpromising = 50%; α = 0.1; β = 0.1.ResultsForty patients were enrolled (median age: 55 years; methylated MGMT promoter: 23%; unmethylated: 70%). The 1-year OS was 93% [95% confidence interval (CI), 84-100] and median OS was 19 months. The median PFS was 10 months, with no pseudo-progression observed. The objective response rate (ORR) was 57%. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas glioblastoma transcriptional subclasses (Nanostring assay) suggested patients with a proneural phenotype (26%) fared worse (ORR = 14%, vs. 77% for other subclasses; P = 0.009). Dynamic susceptibility-contrast perfusion MRI showed marked decreases in relative cerebral blood volume over time (P < 0.0001) but had no prognostic value, whereas higher baseline apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios and persistent hypermetabolism at the 6-month FDG-PET predicted poor OS (P = 0.05 and 0.0001, respectively). Quality-of-life (FACT-BR-4) and neuropsychological test scores were stable over time, although some domains displayed transient decreases following HFSRT.ConclusionsThis aggressive radiotherapy schedule was safe and more convenient for patients, achieving an OS that is comparable with historical controls. Analysis of advanced neuroimaging parameters suggests ADC and FDG-PET as potentially useful biomarkers, whereas tissue correlatives uncovered the poor prognosis associated with the proneural signature in non-IDH-1-mutated glioblastoma.