Dataset Information

Proximity to International Airports and Early Transmission of COVID-19 in the United States-An Epidemiological Assessment of the Geographic Distribution of 490,000 Cases.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Identifying hotspots in a pandemic is essential for early containment. In the context of the rapid global dissemination of the Covid-19 pandemic, describing viral infection rates in relation to international air travel early during the pandemic can help inform future public health policy. The objective of this study is to determine whether proximity to an international airport predicted higher infection rates during the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States (US).

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, the authors examined the incidence of Covid-19 in areas near US international airports in the first weeks after detection of Covid-19 in all 50 states, using publicly available county-level incidence of Covid-19 data. They performed a multiple regression to determine the relative effects of population density and air traffic in the Counties Containing Airports (CCA) and the number of Covid-19 cases, and determined the odds of Covid-19 in cities near airports and CCA compared to the rest of the state.

Results

Multiple regression analysis revealed that air traffic was significantly correlated with Covid-19 cases during the initial phase of pandemic while population density was not significantly correlated. Three weeks into the pandemic, the pooled odds of Covid-19 cases in CCA was 2.66 (95%CI [2.64, 2.68], p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The counties in the US containing international airports represented initial hotspots for Covid-19 transmission. Early public health containment efforts focused on these areas may help mitigate disease transmission during future similar novel respiratory virus epidemics.

SUBMITTER: Chokshi A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7906855 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Proximity to international airports and early transmission of COVID-19 in the United States-An epidemiological assessment of the geographic distribution of 490,000 cases.

Chokshi Aastha A DallaPiazza Michelle M Zhang Wei Wei WW Sifri Ziad Z

Travel medicine and infectious disease 20210226

<h4>Background</h4>Identifying hotspots in a pandemic is essential for early containment. In the context of the rapid global dissemination of the Covid-19 pandemic, describing viral infection rates in relation to international air travel early during the pandemic can help inform future public health policy. The objective of this study is to determine whether proximity to an international airport predicted higher infection rates during the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States ...[more]

PMID: 33640475

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRegionalized trauma care improves outcomes; however, access to care is not uniform across the United States. The objective was to evaluate whether geographic distribution of trauma centers correlates with injury mortality across state trauma systems.MethodsLevel I or II trauma centers in the contiguous United States were mapped. State-level age-adjusted injury fatality rates per 100,000 people were obtained and evaluated for spatial autocorrelation. Nearest neighbor ratios (NNRs) were generated for each state. A NNR less than 1 indicates clustering, while a NNR greater than 1 indicates dispersion. NNRs were tested for difference from random geographic distribution. Fatality rates and NNRs were examined for correlation. Fatality rates were compared between states with trauma center clustering versus dispersion. Trauma center distribution and population density were evaluated. Spatial-lag regression determined the association between fatality rate and NNR, controlling for state-level demographics, population density, injury severity, trauma system resources, and socioeconomic factors.ResultsFatality rates were spatially autocorrelated (Moran's I = 0.35, p < 0.01). Nine states had a clustered pattern (median NNR, 0.55; interquartile range [IQR], 0.48-0.60), 22 had a dispersed pattern (median NNR, 2.00; IQR, 1.68-3.99), and 10 had a random pattern (median NNR, 0.90; IQR, 0.85-1.00) of trauma center distribution. Fatality rate and NNR were correlated (ρ = 0.34, p = 0.03). Clustered states had a lower median injury fatality rate compared with dispersed states (56.9 [IQR, 46.5-58.9] vs. 64.9 [IQR, 52.5-77.1]; p = 0.04). Dispersed compared with clustered states had more counties without a trauma center that had higher population density than counties with a trauma center (5.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.01). Spatial-lag regression demonstrated that fatality rates increased by 0.02 per 100,000 persons for each unit increase in NNR (p < 0.01).ConclusionGeographic distribution of trauma centers correlates with injury mortality, with more clustered state trauma centers associated with lower fatality rates. This may be a result of access relative to population density. These results may have implications for trauma system planning and require further study to investigate underlying mechanisms.Level of evidenceTherapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Project description:RationaleNontuberculous mycobacteria are an important cause of morbidity in the United States, although patient outcomes vary greatly by species. Currently, nationally representative data on the distribution of mycobacterial species from clinical isolates are limited.ObjectivesUsing a national hospitalization database capturing microbiologic data for nearly 6 million patient encounters, we describe the geographic distribution of, and patient demographic features associated with, clinical mycobacterial isolates in the United States.MethodsLinked demographic and microbiologic data from the Premier Healthcare Database were extracted for all patient encounters from 2009 to 2013. Patients with at least one positive potentially pathogenic nontuberculous mycobacterial culture were identified as cases. The period prevalence was calculated, and patient-, encounter-, and hospital-level factors were analyzed. Regional differences in species distribution were analyzed; a subanalysis was conducted among patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes for pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease. Significant differences were assessed (P?<?0.05).ResultsOf 5,928,830 unique patients included during the 5-year study period, 7,812 (0.13%) had at least one positive nontuberculous mycobacterial culture. The mean age of cases was 64 years (range, <1-89 yr), and most were female (52%) and white (70%). Hospitals with cases were more often labeled "urban" (96%), "teaching" (56%), and had at least 500 beds (78%). Species distribution differed significantly by geographic area. Mycobacterium avium complex ranged from 61 to 91% of isolates and were most frequent in the South and Northeast regions; M. abscessus/M. chelonae ranged from 2 to 18% of isolates and were most frequent in the West; and other species, including M. fortuitum and M. kansasii, ranged from 7 to 26% and were also most frequent in the West.ConclusionsSignificant geographic variation exists in the distribution of nontuberculous mycobacterial species in the United States. Whereas M. avium complex was the most common species isolated in the South, M. abscessus/M. chelonae was proportionately higher in the West. Greater clinical awareness in regions with increased levels of harder-to-treat mycobacteria are needed, given differences in treatment options and implications for patient outcomes.