Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Interferon alpha therapy in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera-a systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: Data on the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN)-α for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid, Scopus, COCHRANE registry of clinical trials, and Web of Science from inception through 03/2019 for studies of pegylated IFN (peg-IFN) and non-pegylated IFN (non-peg-IFN) in PV and ET patients. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the primary outcome of overall response rate (ORR) defined as a composite of complete response, partial response, complete hematologic response (CHR) and partial hematologic response. Peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN were compared by meta-regression analyses. In total, 44 studies with 1359 patients (730 ET, 629 PV) were included. ORR were 80.6% (95% confidence interval: 76.6-84.1%, CHR: 59.0% [51.5%-66.1%]) and 76.7% (67.4-84.0%; CHR: 48.5% [37.8-59.4%]) for ET and PV patients, respectively. In meta-regression analyses results did not differ significantly for non-peg-IFN vs. peg-IFN. Annualized rates of thromboembolic complications and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were low at 1.2% and 8.8% for ET and 0.5% and 6.5% for PV patients, respectively. Both peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN can be effective and safe long-term treatments for ET and PV.

SUBMITTER: Bewersdorf JP 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7917159 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6560342 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9101248 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10133851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5679503 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5744051 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6839950 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8161993 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6719465 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6807207 | biostudies-literature