Dataset Information

On the joint role of non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and weight status in predicting postmenopausal weight gain.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To determine how baseline weight status contributes to differences in postmenopausal weight gain among non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs).

Methods

Data were included from 70,750 NHW and NHB postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI OS). Body Mass Index (BMI) at baseline was used to classify women as having normal weight, overweight, obese class I, obese class II or obese class III. Cox proportional hazards was used to estimate the hazard of a 10% or more increase in weight from baseline.

Results

In both crude and adjusted models, NHBs were more likely to experience ?10% weight gain than NHWs within the same category of baseline weight status. Moreover, NHBs who were normal weight at baseline were most likely to experience ?10% weight gain in both crude and adjusted models. Age-stratified results were consistent with overall findings. In all age categories, NHBs who were normal weight at baseline were most likely to experience ?10% weight gain. Based on the results of adjusted models, the joint influence of NHB race/ethnicity and weight status on risk of postmenopausal weight gain was both sub-additive and sub-multiplicative.

Conclusion

NHBs are more likely to experience postmenopausal weight gain than NHWs, and the disparity in risk is most pronounced among those who are normal weight at baseline. To address the disparity in postmenopausal obesity, future studies should focus on identifying and modifying factors that promote weight gain among normal weight NHBs.

SUBMITTER: Ford CN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7920337 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

On the joint role of non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and weight status in predicting postmenopausal weight gain.

Ford Christopher N CN Chang Shine S Wood Alexis C AC Manson JoAnn E JE Garcia David O DO Laroche Helena H Bird Chloe E CE Vitolins Mara Z MZ

PloS one 20210301 3

<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine how baseline weight status contributes to differences in postmenopausal weight gain among non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs).<h4>Methods</h4>Data were included from 70,750 NHW and NHB postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI OS). Body Mass Index (BMI) at baseline was used to classify women as having normal weight, overweight, obese class I, obese class II or obese class III. Cox proportional hazards wa ...[more]

PMID: 33647066

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceSocioeconomic status may help delineate racial and ethnic inequities in mortality.ObjectiveTo investigate the joint associations of race, ethnicity, and neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status with mortality.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective analysis used data from the Multiethnic Cohort Study. A population-based sample of participants recruited from California (mainly Los Angeles County) and Hawaii from 1993 to 1996 was followed up until 2013. African American, European American, Japanese American, Latino American, and Native Hawaiian men and women were included. Participants with baseline residential addresses that could not be geocoded or who were missing information on education or adjustment variables were excluded. Data analyses were conducted from January 2018 to December 2020.ExposuresNeighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) was derived using US Census block group data on education, occupation, unemployment, household income, poverty, rent, and house values. Participants self-reported their highest education attainment. Five racial and ethnic groups, 2 states of residence, 2 nSES, and 2 education categories were combined to create a joint exposure variable. Low and high nSES were defined as quintiles 1 to 3 and 4 to 5, respectively. Low and high education levels were defined as high school or less and greater than high school graduate, respectively.Main outcomes and measuresAll-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and non-CVD and noncancer deaths were ascertained through 2013 via linkage to death certificates and the US National Death Index. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted.ResultsAmong 182 912 participants (100 785 [55.1%] women and 82 127 [44.9%] men; mean [SD] age, 60.0 [8.9] years; 31 138 African American, 45 796 European American, 52 993 Japanese American, 39 844 Latino American, and 13 141 Native Hawaiian participants) with a mean (SD) follow-up of 17 (5) years, there were 63 799 total deaths, including 23 191 CVD deaths, 19 008 cancer deaths, and 21 235 non-CVD and noncancer deaths. The lowest all-cause mortality was found among 15 104 Japanese American participants in Hawaii with high nSES and high education (eg, 2870 all-cause deaths [19.0%]), and this population served as the reference group for all regression analyses. Native Hawaiian participants in Hawaii with low nSES and low education had the highest all-cause mortality HR (2.38; 95% CI, 2.21-2.57). African American and European American participants in California with low nSES and low education had the next highest all-cause mortality HRs (2.01; 95% CI, 1.91-2.11 and 1.98; 95% CI, 1.85-2.12, respectively). Latino American participants in California with low nSES had equivalent all-cause mortality HRs regardless of education level (high education: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.48-1.66; low education: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.50-1.65). Patterns for cause-specific mortality were similar to those for all-cause mortality. For example, Native Hawaiian participants in Hawaii with low nSES and low education had highest CVD mortality HR (2.92; 95% CI, 2.60-3.27) and cancer mortality HR (2.01; 95% CI, 1.77-2.29).Conclusions and relevanceThese results suggest that joint associations of nSES and education may further delineate racial and ethnic inequities in mortality and that future investigations of racial and ethnic inequities in mortality should consider differences by measures of socioeconomic status, especially for underserved populations.

Project description:ObjectivesAdolescent military-dependents experience distinct risk and protective factors, which may necessitate additional clinical considerations. In civilian youth, overweight/obesity is associated with eating, internalizing, and externalizing difficulties, with some studies reporting more difficulties among non-Hispanic White (vs. non-Hispanic Black) youth. It is unknown if these disparities exist among adolescent military-dependents, or between civilian and military-dependent youth.MethodsNon-Hispanic Black (187 civilian, 38 military-dependent) and non-Hispanic White (205 civilian, 84 military-dependent) adolescents with overweight/obesity (14.7 ± 1.6 years; 73.9% girls; body mass index adjusted for age and sex 1.9 ± 0.5) completed a disordered-eating interview; parents completed a measure assessing their child's internalizing and externalizing difficulties. Multiple linear regressions examined parental military-status as a moderator of the relationship of participant race with eating, internalizing, and externalizing difficulties.Results White civilian youth with overweight/obesity reported significantly greater disordered-eating than their Black peers (p < .001); there were no other significant racial differences. In all regressions, parental military-status significantly moderated the association between race and each dependent variable (ps < .047). Black military-dependents (vs. civilians) reported more disordered-eating and internalizing difficulties (ps = .01). White military-dependents (vs. civilians) reported fewer externalizing difficulties (p = .01).Conclusions Black adolescent military-dependents with overweight/obesity may experience more eating and internalizing difficulties (vs. civilians), a pattern not observed among White participants. Future work should examine if being a military-dependent and a historically marginalized racial group member accounts for these findings. Such data may inform providers of youth with intersecting minority identities.

Project description:ObjectiveBreast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among Hispanic women. Unfortunately, few studies disaggregate Hispanic patients by race to understand its implications on treatment and clinical outcomes such as mortality. The aim of this study is to examine surgical management and overall mortality among different subgroups of women who self-identify as Hispanic.MethodsHispanic female patients, ages 18-90, stages I-III, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2015 from the National Cancer Data Base were identified. The study cohort was divided into three ethnoracial categories: (1) Hispanic White (HW), 2) Hispanic Black (HB), and 3) Hispanic Other (HO). Descriptive statistics and multivariate models were constructed to determine the relationship between sociodemographic factors, clinical variables, surgical management, and mortality when disaggregated by race.ResultsThere were 56,675 Hispanic women who met the study criteria. Most where HW (n=50,599, 89.3%) and the rest were HB (n=1,334, 2.4%) and HO (n=4,742, 8.3%). There was no difference between the three groups on receipt of breast conservation therapy (P=0.12). HB (48.5%) and HO (46.6%) women were more likely to undergo reconstruction than those who identified as HW (38.7%) (P<0.001). Additionally, HB (38.3%) women were more likely to undergo tissue-based reconstruction than HW (29.0%) and HO women (30%) (P=0.0008). There was no difference between the groups in the utilization of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) (P=0.078). On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in mortality between HB and HW patients (HR 1.18, 95%CI 0.92-1.51; Ref HW). However, HO women had a 24% relative risk reduction in mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.92; HW ref).ConclusionFindings from this study suggest there are ethnoracial disparities in reconstruction utilization and mortality among Hispanic women. Future studies should examine how culture, language, healthcare access, and patient preferences contribute to these disparities.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Very few studies with nationally representative samples have investigated the combined effects of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position (SEP) on polypharmacy (PP) among older Americans. For instance, we do not know if prevalence of PP differs between African Americans (AA) and white older adults, whether this difference is due to a racial gap in SEP, or whether racial and ethnic differences exist in the effects of SEP indicators on PP. Aims: We investigated joint effects of race/ethnicity and SEP on PP in a national household sample of American older adults. Methods: The first wave of the University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging included a total of 906 older adults who were 65 years or older (80 AA and 826 white). Race/ethnicity, SEP (income, education attainment, marital status, and employment), age, gender, and PP (using 5+ medications) were measured. Logistic regression was applied for data analysis. Results: Race/ethnicity, age, marital status, and employment did not correlate with PP; however, female gender, low education attainment, and low income were associated with higher odds of PP among participants. Race/ethnicity interacted with low income on odds of PP, suggesting that low income might be more strongly associated with PP in AA than white older adults. Conclusions: While SEP indicators influence the risk of PP, such effects may not be identical across diverse racial and ethnic groups. That is, race/ethnicity and SEP have combined/interdependent rather than separate/independent effects on PP. Low-income AA older adults particularly need to be evaluated for PP. Given that race and SEP have intertwined effects on PP, racially and ethnically tailored interventions that address PP among low-income AA older adults may be superior to universal interventions and programs that ignore the specific needs of diverse populations. The results are preliminary and require replication in larger sample sizes, with PP measured directly without relying on individuals' self-reports, and with joint data collected on chronic disease.

Dataset Information

On the joint role of non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and weight status in predicting postmenopausal weight gain.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

On the joint role of non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and weight status in predicting postmenopausal weight gain.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets