Dataset Information

COVID Coach: Exploring Usage of a Public Mental Health App Designed for the COVID-19 Pandemic.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted mental health and well-being. Mobile mental health apps can be scalable, useful tools in large-scale disaster responses and are particularly promising for reaching vulnerable populations. COVID Coach is a free, evidence-informed mobile app designed specifically to provide tools and resources for addressing COVID-19 related stress.

Objective

The purpose of the current study was to characterize overall usage of COVID Coach, explore retention and return usage, and assess whether the app was reaching individuals that may benefit from mental health resources.

Methods

Anonymous usage data collected from COVID Coach between May 1, 2020 through October 31, 2020 were extracted and analyzed for this study. The sample included 49,287 unique user codes and 3,368,931 in-app events.

Results

Usage of interactive tools for coping and stress management comprised the majority of key app events (70.4%) and the majority of app users tried a tool for managing stress (58.8%). COVID Coach was utilized for 3 days or fewer among 80.9% of the sample whose first day of app use occurred within the 6-month observation window. Usage of the key content in COVID Coach predicted returning to the app for a second day. Among those who tried at least one coping tool on their first day of app use, 57.2% returned for a second visit; whereas only 46.3% of those who did not try a tool returned (P < .001). Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and PTSD were prevalent among app users. For example, among app users that completed an anxiety assessment on their first day of app use (n = 4,870; 11.4% of users), 55.1% (n = 2,680) reported levels of anxiety that were moderate to severe, and 29.9% (n = 1,455) of scores fell into the severe symptom range. On average, those with moderate levels of depression on their first day of app use returned to the app for a greater number of days (M = 3.72 days) than those with minimal symptoms (M = 3.08 days, (t(1) = 3.01, P = .003) and individuals with significant PTSD symptoms on their first day of app use utilized the app for a significantly greater number of days (M = 3.79 days) than those with fewer symptoms (M = 3.13 days, (t(1) = 2.29, P = .022).

Conclusions

As the mental health impacts of the pandemic continue to be widespread and increasing, digital health resources, such as apps like COVID Coach, are a scalable way to provide evidence-informed tools and resources. Future research is needed to better understand for whom and under what conditions the app is most helpful and how to increase and sustain engagement.

Clinicaltrial

SUBMITTER: Jaworski BK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7924218 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exploring Usage of COVID Coach, a Public Mental Health App Designed for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Analytics Data.

Jaworski Beth K BK Taylor Katherine K Ramsey Kelly M KM Heinz Adrienne A Steinmetz Sarah S Pagano Ian I Moraja Giovanni G Owen Jason E JE

Journal of medical Internet research 20210301 3

<h4>Background</h4>The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted mental health and well-being. Mobile mental health apps can be scalable and useful tools in large-scale disaster responses and are particularly promising for reaching vulnerable populations. COVID Coach is a free, evidence-informed mobile app designed specifically to provide tools and resources for addressing COVID-19-related stress.<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to characterize the overall usage of COVID Coach, ...[more]

PMID: 33606656

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAfter two months of implementing a partial lockdown, the Indonesian government had announced the "New Normal" policy to prevent a further economic crash in the country. This policy received many critics, as Indonesia still experiencing a fluctuated number of infected cases. Understanding public perception through effective risk communication can assist the government in relaying an appropriate message to improve people's compliance and to avoid further disease spread.ObjectiveThis study observed how risk communication using social media platforms like Twitter could be adopted to measure public attention on COVID-19 related issues "New Normal".MethodFrom May 21 to June 18, 2020, we archived all tweets related to COVID-19 containing keywords: "#NewNormal", and "New Normal" using Drone Emprit Academy (DEA) engine. DEA search API collected all requested tweets and described the cumulative tweets for trend analysis, word segmentation, and word frequency. We further analyzed the public perception using sentiment analysis and identified the predominant tweets using emotion analysis.ResultWe collected 284,216 tweets from 137,057 active users. From the trend analysis, we observed three stages of the changing trend of the public's attention on the "New Normal". Results from the sentiment analysis indicate that more than half of the population (52%) had a "positive" sentiment towards the "New Normal" issues while only 41% of them had a "negative" perception. Our study also demonstrated the public's sentiment trend has gradually shifted from "negative" to "positive" due to the influence of both the government actions and the spread of the disease. A more detailed analysis of the emotion analysis showed that the majority of the public emotions (77.6%) relied on the emotion of "trust", "anticipation", and "joy". Meanwhile, people were also surprised (8.62%) that the Indonesian government progressed to the "New Normal" concept despite a fluctuating number of cases.ConclusionOur findings offer an opportunity for the government to use Twitter in the process of quick decision-making and policy evaluation during uncertain times in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Project description:BackgroundAs of the present, the twenty-first century is experiencing what may be one of its most devastating events, in respect to infected and dead people by the virus. Now known to the world as COVID-19, the devastating disease of what has become a pandemic started its spread from Wuhan, China and swiftly engulfed the whole world with almost 11 million cases, in a span of around six months. It has not only increased the global burden of disease but has heavily dented many social institutions, including education.MethodsThis study investigates how the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent measures of lockdown, quarantine, and social distancing have affected students. We look specifically into the effects on individuals' mental health, that is, the stress and anxiety levels of college and university students using the Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS).ResultsAmong 494 respondents, 61% were females, and the majority (77.3%) of the students were in the age group of 19-25 years. Among the respondents, 125 (25.3%), 45 (9.1%) and 34 (6.9%) experienced minimal to moderate, severe, and most extreme levels of anxiety, respectively. The variables of gender, age and year of study were significant at the 0.25 level by univariate analyses. Nevertheless, the ordinal regression indicates that only gender was significant. The odds of a female student being more anxious are higher compared to a male student (OR = 1.779, 95% CI [1.202-2.634], P = 0.004). The most prominent stressors attained from the qualitative feedback from the Pakistani students are associated with online teaching, concerns about their academic performance and completion of the current semester, uncertainty related to exam dates, and the status of the following semester.ConclusionsThis study will add to the existing body of literature on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social and psychological health of students. The study outcomes will provide basic data for further applied and action research and a framework for universities and policy makers in Pakistan and the neighboring countries in the region with the same cultural contexts. Thus, relevant health interventions can be designed for better mental health and educational attainments of students from higher educational institutions. This pathological pandemic may well lead to another pandemic of mental and behavioral illness. All stakeholders should join force regardless of pre-existing differences and inequalities to ensure the well-being of future generations, specifically students from higher educational institutions. The long-lasting impacts and the aftermath of this pandemic will unquestionably need further and future investigations. Keywords: Anxiety, students, mental health, COVID-19, Pakistan.

Project description:BackgroundLittle is known about the usage of coping strategies recommended by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether coping strategy usage varies by pre-pandemic mental health. This study examined the prevalence of different coping strategies and associations of their usage with pre-pandemic mental health.MethodsData were collected from adults residing in metropolitan areas of the U.S. South in May/June 2020 using random-digit-dialing and web-based surveys (n = 1,644). We estimated the prevalence of each coping strategy: (1) keeping up-to-date about COVID-19; (2) taking breaks from the news or social media; (3) taking care of physical health; (4) engaging in relaxing activities; (5) reaching out to and spending time with others; and (6) trying to find comfort in religious or spiritual beliefs. We examined the association between the use of each strategy and pre-pandemic mental health using modified Poisson regression, adjusting for covariates. We also analyzed the association between pre-pandemic mental health and the number of coping strategies employed using ordered logistic regression.ResultsThe most prevalent strategies were: "keeping up-to-date about COVID-19" (53%), "taking care of physical health" (52%), and "reaching out to and spending time with others" (52%). Good pre-pandemic mental health was associated with an increased prevalence of "reaching out to and spending time with others" (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.91). The use of other coping strategies and the number of coping strategies used during the pandemic did not vary by pre-pandemic mental health.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that people who had good pre-pandemic mental health were more likely to connect with other people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the well-documented impact of social support on mental health in disaster contexts, efforts to promote safe social connections for those with pre-existing mental health concerns are needed.