Dataset Information

The efficacy and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-operable esophageal cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To report outcomes and toxicity in patients who received definitive concurrent chemoradiation (DCCRT) for non-operable esophageal cancer (EC) in the modern era, and to identify markers of overall and disease-free survival (OS/DFS).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable EC who received DCCRT at our institution between 1/2008 and 1/2019. Descriptive statistics were used to report disease-control outcomes and CTCAE v4.0-5.0 toxicities. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression, and stepwise regression were used to identify associations with survival.

Results

At a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 130 patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) (62%) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (38%) were evaluable (Stage II-III: 92%). Patients received carboplatin/paclitaxel (75%) or fluorouracil-based (25%) concurrent chemotherapy. Median total RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 44.7-71.4 Gy) delivered in 28 fractions (24-35). Locoregional and distant recurrence occurred in 30% and 35% of AC, and 24% and 33% of SCC, respectively. Median OS and DFS were 22.9 and 10.7 months in AC, and 25.7 and 20.2 months in SCC, respectively. On stepwise regression, tumor stage, feeding tube during DCCRT, and change in primary tumor PET/CT SUVmax were significantly associated with OS and DFS. Most severe toxicities were acute grade 4 hematologic cytopenia (6%) and radiation dermatitis (1%). Most common acute grade 3 toxicities were hematologic cytopenia (35%), dysphagia (23%), and anorexia (19%).

Conclusions

Treatment of non-operable EC with DCCRT has acceptable toxicity and can provide multi-year disease control for some patients, even in AC. Continued follow-up and investigation in large studies would be useful.

SUBMITTER: Dreyfuss AD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7926027 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The efficacy and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-operable esophageal cancer.

Dreyfuss Alexandra D AD Barsky Andrew R AR Wileyto E Paul EP Eads Jennifer R JR Kucharczuk John C JC Williams Noel N NN Karasic Thomas B TB Metz James M JM Ben-Josef Edgar E Plastaras John P JP Wojcieszynski Andrzej P AP

Cancer medicine 20210120 4

<h4>Objective</h4>To report outcomes and toxicity in patients who received definitive concurrent chemoradiation (DCCRT) for non-operable esophageal cancer (EC) in the modern era, and to identify markers of overall and disease-free survival (OS/DFS).<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable EC who received DCCRT at our institution between 1/2008 and 1/2019. Descriptive statistics were used to report disease-control outcomes and CTCAE v4.0-5.0 toxiciti ...[more]

PMID: 33474812

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTraditional Chinese medicine (TCM) makes a synergistic and attenuative effect when combined with chemoradiotherapy. However, strong evidence-based studies are lacking. The study sought to investigate whether Zengxiao Jiandu decoction as an adjunctive therapy is superior to definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DCCRT) alone in unresectable, locally advanced (LA), stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients with unresectable LA-NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive DCCRT either combined with Zengxiao Jiandu decoction (TCM arm) or placebo therapy (Control arm), by computer-generated random assignment lists using a central randomization system. The patients were routinely followed-up every 3 months for the first 2 years after the therapy, and every 6 months for the subsequent 3 years, or earlier if clinically indicated. The primary endpoint was grade ≥3 chemoradiotherapy-related toxicities, while secondary endpoints included the completion rate of chemoradiotherapy, the clinical objective response rate (ORR), and survival. The placebo achieved full consistency in color, aroma, taste and appearance with the Zengxiao Jiandu decoction.ResultsFrom February 2019 to December 2020, 163 patients were randomly allocated to TCM arm (n=82) or Control arm (n=81). Fifty-nine (72.0%) patients in TCM arm finished chemoradiotherapy per protocol and 79 (96.3%) received protocol-specified Zengxiao Jiandu decoction. Forty-two patients in Control arm finished chemoradiotherapy per protocol. The incidence of grade ≥3 chemoradiotherapy-related toxicities was higher in Control arm than TCM arm (44.4% vs. 31.7%, P=0.094). Grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis occurred more frequently in Control arm than TCM arm (13.6% vs. 3.7%, P=0.024). The completion rate of the protocol-specified chemotherapy was significantly higher in TCM arm than Control arm (79.3% vs. 64.2%, P=0.033), but the completion rates of the definitive-dose radiotherapy were similar. There were no significant differences in ORR between the 2 arms. The progression-free survival (PFS) of TCM arm was significantly better than Control arm (median PFS, 12.0 vs. 9.0 months, P=0.035). However, Zengxiao Jiandu decoction was not found to produce any significant benefit in overall survival.ConclusionsThe Zengxiao Jiandu decoction adjunctive therapy, as compared to DCCRT alone, reduced grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis, improved the completion rate of DCCRT, and prolonged PFS for unresectable LA-NSCLC.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000031667.

Project description:Background Treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the best option for patients with locally advanced esophageal tumors considered unresectable or for patients without clinical conditions to undergo surgical treatment. Technological advances in radiotherapy in the last decades have made treatment more accurate with less toxicity, and the association with more effective systemic treatment has been gradually improving survival rates. Aim Evaluate clinical prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (ChT). Material and methods The clinical records of 60 patients treated from April 2011 until December 2019 with esophageal cancer considered unresectable and/or without clinical conditions for surgery, treated with definitive CRT, were analyzed. All patients had upper digestive endoscopy (UDE) with positive biopsy, neck, chest, and abdominal CT scan, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients were followed with physical examination and CTs every three months in the first and second years and every six months from the third year of follow-up. UDE was made every three to six months after the end of the treatment or in suspicion of tumor recurrence. PET-CT was also performed in the follow-up when clinically necessary. Local and regional failure (LRF) was defined as abnormalities in the image tests within the planning target volume (PTV) and/or positive biopsy on UDE. Any other failure was defined as a distant failure (DF). PFS was defined in the record of the first tumor recurrence site and OS in the death record from the date of the start of treatment. Results The median age of the patients was 66 years (range: 33 to 83 years) and 46 patients (76.7%) were male. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most frequent histological type (85%). Most patients had tumors located in the mid-thoracic esophagus (53.3%) and stage III or IV (59.9%). All patients were treated using 3D (76.7%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; 23.3%). The median total dose was 50.4Gy (41.4-50.4). All patients received platinum-based ChT concomitant with RT. The most common regimen used was carboplatin and paclitaxel, with a median of five cycles. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median PFS and OS were 10 and 20 months, respectively. LRF and DF as the first site of failure were observed in 22 (36.6%) and 26 (43.3%) patients, respectively. In the univariate analysis, tumor length lower than 2.6 cm, gross tumor volume (GTV) volume lower than 28 cm3, clinical tumor stages T1 and T2, clinical node stage N0, clinical prognostic stage groups I and II, and complete response to treatment, were statistically significant factors for better PFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of clinical nodal stage N0 was related to better PFS (p=0.02). Conclusion Node clinical status was the most important clinical factor for PFS. Despite all the technical progress observed in radiotherapy, treatments concomitant with platinum-based chemotherapy are associated with high levels of LRF and DF. New strategies in systemic therapy and radiotherapy are necessary for improving outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundThe literature regarding pericardial effusion after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for esophageal cancer was lacking. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of pericardial effusion in esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT.MethodsA total of 126 consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. The pericardial effusion was determined on computed tomography scan of the chest and graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups by the log-rank test. The risk factors of pericardial effusion were determined with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 14.0 months. Thirty-seven (29.4%) patients had pericardial effusion after a median interval of 6.6 months since the end of IMRT. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion of any grade was higher in patients with mean heart dose > 23.45 Gy (p = 0.00018), heart V30 > 33.55% (p = 0.00015), mean pericardium dose > 20.33 Gy (p = 0.00027), and pericardium V20 > 42.55% (p = 0.00018). Furthermore, eight (6.3%) patients had symptoms related to pericardial effusion and were considered as cases with pericardial effusion ≥ grade 3. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion ≥ grade 3 was higher in patients with pericardium V30 > 65.80% (p = 0.00028), V40 > 55.35% (p < 0.0001), and V60 > 24.70% (p = 0.0021). Multivariate analyses showed the above dose-volume parameters predicted the risk of pericardial effusion in esophageal cancer.ConclusionsDose-volume parameters predicting the risk of pericardial effusion were identified in esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT. They could be applied as constraints of IMRT for esophageal cancer.

Dataset Information

The efficacy and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-operable esophageal cancer.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The efficacy and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-operable esophageal cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets