Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Evaluating short-term forecasting of COVID-19 cases among different epidemiological models under a Bayesian framework.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Forecasting of COVID-19 cases daily and weekly has been one of the challenges posed to governments and the health sector globally. To facilitate informed public health decisions, the concerned parties rely on short-term daily projections generated via predictive modeling. We calibrate stochastic variants of growth models and the standard susceptible-infectious-removed model into 1 Bayesian framework to evaluate and compare their short-term forecasts.

Results

We implement rolling-origin cross-validation to compare the short-term forecasting performance of the stochastic epidemiological models and an autoregressive moving average model across 20 countries that had the most confirmed COVID-19 cases as of August 22, 2020.

Conclusion

None of the models proved to be a gold standard across all regions, while all outperformed the autoregressive moving average model in terms of the accuracy of forecast and interpretability.

SUBMITTER: Li Q 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7928884 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8024267 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7252162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6704534 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5575305 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8139504 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4547743 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8211153 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5558979 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8310337 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6517329 | biostudies-other