Dataset Information

Probiotic supplements and bone health in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Osteoporosis is a common disease in postmenopausal women. Several studies have analysed the associations between dietary supplementation with probiotics and bone health in postmenopausal women, but the results are still controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effects of probiotics supplement on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers for postmenopausal women.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from their inception to November 2020 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing probiotic supplements and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Study-specific risk estimates were combined using random-effect models.

Results

Five RCTs (n=497) were included. Probiotic supplements were associated with a significantly higher BMD in the lumbar spine (standardised mean difference, SMD=0.27, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.44) than in control. There was no difference between probiotic supplements and BMD in hips (SMD=0.22, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.52). Collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide levels in the treatment groups were significantly lower than those of the placebo group (SMD=-0.34, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.09). In subgroup meta-analysis, levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin and tumour necrosis factor did not differ between the probiotic and placebo groups.

Conclusions

We conclude cautiously that supplementation with probiotics could increase lumbar BMD. More RCTs are recommended to validate or update these results.

SUBMITTER: Yu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7929795 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Probiotic supplements and bone health in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Yu Jiawei J Cao Gaoyang G Yuan Shuohui S Luo Cong C Yu Jiafeng J Cai Ming M

BMJ open 20210302 3

<h4>Objective</h4>Osteoporosis is a common disease in postmenopausal women. Several studies have analysed the associations between dietary supplementation with probiotics and bone health in postmenopausal women, but the results are still controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effects of probiotics supplement on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers for postmenopausal women.<h4>Design</h4>Systematic review and meta-analysis.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically se ...[more]

PMID: 33653743

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundProbiotic supplements may be seen as a promising way to improve glucose metabolism. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic supplements on blood glucose, insulin resistance/sensitivity, and prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among pregnant women.MethodsEleven electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2020. Two authors independently identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessed the eligibility and quality of the included studies, and then extracted data. The primary outcomes were fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 1 h and 2 h plasma glucose after 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), HbA1c, fasting plasma insulin, insulin resistance, and insulin sensitivity. Fixed and random effect models were used to pool the results.ResultsA total of 20 RCTs involving 2972 participants were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The pooled results of this research showed that probiotic supplements could reduce the level of FPG (mean difference (MD) = -0.11; 95% CI = -0.15 to -0.04; P=0.0007), serum insulin (MD = -1.68; 95% CI = -2.44 to -0.92; P < 0.00001), insulin resistance (MD = -0.36; 95% CI = -0.53 to -0.20; P < 0.00001), and insulin sensitivity (MD = -21.80; 95% CI = -31.92 to -11.67; P < 0.00001). Regarding the subgroup analysis of different pregnant women, the effects of probiotics on FPG, insulin, and insulin resistance were more obvious among GDM and healthy women than among overweight/obese women. Furthermore, the differences were not significant in HbA1c (MD = -0.05; 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.03; P=0.23), 1 h OGTT (MD = -0.07; 95% CI = -0.25 to 0.10; P=0.42), and 2 h OGTT (MD = -0.03; 95% CI = -0.17 to 0.12; P=0.72).ConclusionThis review found that probiotic supplements had certain functions to reduce the level of FPG and improve insulin, insulin resistance, and insulin sensitivity, especially for GDM and healthy pregnant women.

Project description:Milk and milk product consumption is positively associated with bone mineral density (BMD). Emerging evidence suggests that fermented milk products (FMPs) may have specific beneficial effects on skeletal health. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of FMPs on bone health indicators in postmenopausal women given their increased risk for osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort and case-control studies that examined the relation between FMPs and bone health outcomes (fracture incidence, BMD, BMD T-score, and percentage change in bone turnover markers) in postmenopausal women. Two reviewers independently conducted abstract and full-text screenings and data extractions. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for interventional and observational studies. Pooled RRs were obtained using a random-effects model by the DerSimonian-Laird method. Three RCTs, 3 prospective cohorts, and 3 case-control studies met the inclusion criteria. Results of the meta-analysis of 3 cohort studies (n = 102,819) suggest that higher yogurt consumption was associated with reduced hip fracture risk (pooled RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.92, I2 = 29%), but no difference in hip fracture risk was found between higher and lower cheese consumption (pooled RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.10, I2 = 0%). Case-control studies revealed that cheese intake had either a null or a protective effect against osteoporosis (BMD T-score ≤-2.5). Daily yogurt or cheese intervention (<2 mo) decreased bone resorption marker concentrations, but had no effect on bone formation markers. In postmenopausal women, of the FMPs studied, only greater yogurt consumption was associated with a reduced risk of hip fracture compared with low or no intake. Daily cheese intake may be associated with higher BMD T-scores, but evidence was limited. Additional and longer-term trials examining these relations are warranted.

Project description:IntroductionPostmenopausal osteoporosis, caused by ageing and oestrogen deficiency, seriously threatens women's physical and mental health. Postmenopausal osteopenia is the transition from healthy bone to osteoporosis, and it may be the key period for preventing bone loss. Moxibustion, a physical therapy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, has potential benefits for osteoporosis treatment and prevention, but it has not been adequately studied. This study aims to explore the clinical effects and safety of moxibustion in delaying bone loss in postmenopausal women.Methods and analysisIn this parallel-design, randomised, patient-blind and assessor-blind, controlled clinical study, 150 women with osteopenia at low fracture risk will be randomly assigned to a moxibustion treatment (MT) group or a placebo-moxibustion control (PMC) group in a 1:1 ratio. In addition to the fundamental measures (vitamin D3 and calcium) as recommended by the guidelines, participants of the two groups will receive MT or PMC treatment for 42 sessions over 12 months. The primary outcome will be the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine at the end of the 12-month treatment, and secondary outcomes will be the BMD of the femoral neck and total hip, T-scores, bone turnover markers, serum calcium levels, serum magnesium levels, serum phosphorus levels, serum parathyroid hormone levels and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, intensity of bone pain, quality of life, incidence of osteoporosis and fractures, usage of emergency drugs or surgery, participant self-evaluation of therapeutic effects and the rate of adverse events. All statistical analyses will be performed based on the intention-to-treat and per-protocol principle.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University (permission number: 2021-1243). The results are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberChiCTR2100053953.

Project description:BackgroundThe sequential anti-osteoporotic treatment for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is important, but the order in which different types of drugs are used is confusing and controversial. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of available sequential treatments to explore the most efficacious strategy for long-term management of osteoporosis.MethodsIn this network meta-analysis, we searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 19, 2023 to identify randomised controlled trials comparing sequential treatments for women with PMO. The identified trials were screened by reading the title and abstract, and only randomised clinical trials involving sequential anti-osteoporotic treatments and reported relevant outcomes for PMO were included. The main outcomes included vertebral fracture risk, the percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) in different body parts, and all safety indicators in the stage after switching treatment. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using the multivariate random effects method and evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in the Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42022360236.FindingsA total of 19 trials comprising 18,416 participants were included in the study. Five different sequential treatments were investigated as the main interventions and compared to the corresponding control groups. The intervention groups in this study comprised the following treatment switch protocols: switching from an anabolic agent (AB) to an anti-resorptive agent (AR) (ABtAR), transitioning from one AR to another AR (ARtAAR), shifting from an AR to an AB (ARtAB), switching from an AB to a combined treatment of AB and AR (ABtC), and transitioning from an AR to a combined treatment (ARtC). A significant reduction in the incidence of vertebral fractures was observed in ARtC, ABtAR and ARtAB in the second stage, and ARtC had the lowest incidence with 81.5% SUCRA. ARtAAR and ABtAR were two effective strategies for preventing fractures and improving BMD in other body parts. Especially, ARtAAR could improve total hip BMD with the highest 96.1% SUCRA, and ABtAR could decrease the risk of total fractures with the highest 94.3% SUCRA. Almost no difference was observed in safety outcomes in other comparisons.InterpretationOur findings suggested that the ARtAAR and ABtAR strategy are the effective and safe sequential treatment for preventing fracture and improving BMD for PMO. ARtC is more effective in preventing vertebral fractures.FundingThe National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170900, 81970762), the Hunan Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and the Hunan Province High-level Health Talents "225" Project.

Project description:IntroductionAnemia is a common global health problem, particularly in impoverished regions, with a high incidence rate. The condition is multifactorial, with iron deficiency being one of the most prevalent causes. Current treatment for anemia often relies on iron supplements or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, although these therapies may show limited efficacy for some patients. Recent evidence suggests that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, as microbiome modulators, hold significant potential in the treatment of anemia. These interventions may enhance iron absorption and improve overall blood health through their impact on gut microbiota, thus providing an alternative or complementary approach to conventional treatments.MethodsSix databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WangFang data library, were searched up to November 20, 2024. Studies published in English and Chinese were included. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics in treating anemia. The experimental groups received probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics, while the control groups received placebo, alternative treatments, or no treatment. The primary outcome was hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Secondary outcomes included serum iron (SI) and serum ferritin (SF). A descriptive analysis was conducted for studies where meta-analysis was not feasible. The GRADE tool was used to assess the quality of evidence, and the Cochrane guidelines were employed to evaluate the risk of bias in each study.ResultsSeven studies were included comprising a total of eight RCTs, with the main types of anemia being iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD), involving 632 patients. The analysis revealed that probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics significantly improved Hb levels in patients with anemia (WMD = 10.760, 95% CI: 4.593 to 16.747, p = 0.001), though heterogeneity was high (I² = 96.5%). Two RCTs (n = 120 participants) reported significant increases in serum iron levels in the probiotic group (WMD = 3.835, 95% CI: 3.271 to 4.400), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 38.7%). Two RCTs (n = 192 participants) reported no significant differences were observed between the groups in serum ferritin levels (WMD = 8.048, p = 0.115), and heterogeneity remained high (I² = 62.6%). Subgroup analyses revealed that probiotics improved Hb levels in renal and iron-deficiency anemia, as well as across different doses. The synbiotic group showed consistent efficacy (I² = 0%), while the prebiotic group did not exhibit significant effects, with extremely high heterogeneity (I² = 99.3%). This indicates that heterogeneity may stem from variations in intervention types, and the results should be interpreted with caution.ConclusionThere is moderate-quality evidence suggesting that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics may improve anemia management, particularly by enhancing Hb levels. Further high-quality RCTs are required to explore the specific role of synbiotics in anemia management, including their comparative efficacy against probiotics and prebiotics alone, and their impact on gastrointestinal factors such as gut microbiota modulation and inflammation reduction.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42024590073.

Dataset Information

Probiotic supplements and bone health in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Objective

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Probiotic supplements and bone health in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets