Diagnostic accuracy comparison of three fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay platforms for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Serological test is an essential surveillance tool to track down the extensiveness of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and subsequently to move out from the enforced lockdown stage.Objective
The study measures the diagnostic accuracy of three popular chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) based automated platforms for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and compares their agreements.Study design
Serum samples of 594 COVID-19 positive patients and 100 samples from pre-COVID cases were tested by three CLIA based automated platforms: Abbott architect i2000SR, Roche cobas e411 and Yhlo iFlash 1800 and their diagnostic accuracy were compared by the area under the curves (AUC) value obtained from receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Cohen's kappa statistic and McNemar's test were used to interpret the agreement between the platforms.Results
All three platforms showed high specificity as claimed by the manufacturer. Sensitivity was calculated as 64.48 % (58.67-70.3) for Abbott, 80.48 % (76.62-84.34) for Roche and 76.94 % (72.65-81.23) for Yhlo. AUC was maximum for Roche (0.929). The Cohen's kappa value was determined in between 0.69-0.89 as the inter-rater agreements.Conclusion
The overall statistical analysis demonstrated cobas e411 as the diagnostically most accurate platform among the three.
SUBMITTER: Parai D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7934617 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionMonitoring circulating progesterone concentration ([P4]) is an important component of basic and applied reproduction research and clinical settings. IMMULITE® 2000 XPi (Siemens Healthineers, Cary, NC) is a newly upgraded fully automated immunoassay system marketed for human use to measure concentrations of different measurands including P4.ObjectivesOur objective was therefore to characterize the analytical performance of the IMMULITE® 2000 XPi P4 immunoassay (IPI) across the reportable range in serum and plasma of cattle.MethodsThe IPI validation protocols included characterization of the method linearity, within-run, and between-run precision through calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV). The method accuracy was assessed through the calculation of the spiking-recovery (SR) bias across the reportable range (0.2-40.0 ng/mL). Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine the interlaboratory bias for two laboratories. Three types of observed total error (TEo) were calculated based on the considered type of bias, TEoSR (spiking-recovery), TEoRB (range-based bias), and TEoAB (average-based bias).ResultsThe IPI was linearly related to the true value (R 2 = 0.997) across the reportable range. The within-run and between-run precision (CV%) of the IPI for both serum and plasma [P4] of clinical relevance (1, 2, 5, and 10 ng/mL) were <5 and <10%, respectively. The TEo reported here for serum and plasma at [P4] of 1 and 5 ng/mL was ~20 and 25%, respectively. Of interest, the three types of TEo were relatively similar regardless of the considered bias.ConclusionsWe concluded that the automated IPI provides a precise, accurate, reliable, and safe method for measuring [P4] in both serum and plasma of cattle. Consistent with the manufacturer's recommendations, the serum matrix is more accurate than plasma.
| S-EPMC9868466 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Manual ELISA assays are the most commonly used methods for quantification of biomarkers; however, they often show inter- and intra-laboratory variability that limits their wide use. Here, we compared the Innotest ELISA method with two fully automated platforms (Lumipulse and Elecsys) to determine whether these new methods can provide effective substitutes for ELISA assays. We included 149 patients with AD (n = 34), MCI (n = 94) and non-AD dementias (n = 21). Aβ42, T-tau, and P-tau were quantified using the ELISA method (Innotest, Fujirebio Europe), CLEIA method on a Lumipulse G600II (Fujirebio Diagnostics), and ECLIA method on a Cobas e 601 (Roche Diagnostics) instrument. We found a high correlation between the three methods, although there were systematic differences between biomarker values measured by each method. Both Lumipulse and Elecsys methods were highly concordant with clinical diagnoses, and the combination of Lumipulse Aβ42 and P-tau had the highest discriminating power (AUC 0.915, 95% CI 0.822-1.000). We also assessed the agreement of AT(N) classification for each method with AD diagnosis. Although differences were not significant, the use of Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio instead of Aβ42 alone in AT(N) classification enhanced the diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.798, 95% CI 0.649-0.947 vs. AUC 0.778, 95% CI 0.617-0.939). We determined the cut-offs for the Lumipulse and Elecsys assays based on the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio ± status as a marker of amyloid pathology, and these cut-offs were consistent with those recommended by manufacturers, which had been determined based on visual amyloid PET imaging or diagnostic accuracy. Finally, the biomarker ratios (P-tau/Aβ42 and T-tau/Aβ42) were more consistent with the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio for both Lumipulse and Elecsys methods, and Elecsys P-tau/Aβ42 had the highest consistency with amyloid pathology (AUC 0.994, 95% CI 0.986-1.000 and OPA 96.4%) at the ≥0.024 cut-off. The Lumipulse and Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD assays showed high analytical and clinical performances. As both automated platforms were standardized for reference samples, their use is recommended for the measurement of CSF AD biomarkers compared with unstandardized manual methods, such as Innotest ELISA, that have demonstrated a high inter and intra-laboratory variability.
| S-EPMC7970049 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Since December 2019, we have been in the battlefield with a new threat to the humanity, known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), characterized by viral pneumonia. It may be asymptomatic or cause various symptoms, ranging from flu-like symptoms to acute respiratory distress syndrome and eventually death. At present, the only reliable test for COVID-19 diagnosis is quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Assessing the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 could increase the detection sensitivity of infected population. Hereby, we report the performances of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) on 276 serum samples. One hundred samples obtained from COVID-19 negative subjects (COVID-19 free) were analyzed to evaluate the diagnostic specificity of antibody (Ab) detection. Thereafter, 176 samples obtained from 125 patients with confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-19 patients) were selected to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of the CLIA. All samples were analyzed on MAGLUMI 800 platform. All COVID-19 free samples had Ab levels below the cutoff values. Hence, the diagnostic specificity was estimated at 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 96.3-100.0; positive predictive value = 100%). By the 18th day from the onset of symptoms, we reached an optimal diagnostic sensitivity (more than 95.0%) In fact, the diagnostic sensitivity increased over time and between 15 and 25 days after symptoms onset, reached 95.5% (95% CI = 84.9-99.2). The new automated CLIA analyzer appeared to be a robust and reliable method to measure specific Ab against COVID-19 at high throughput. Our data suggest that combining Ab and nucleic acid detection could increase diagnostic sensitivity.
| S-EPMC7436871 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Clostridium difficile colitis is caused by a cytotoxin produced by the anaerobic bacteria C. difficile on the epithelial cells of the large intestine, particularly C. difficile toxin B (Tcd B). Current C. difficile toxin assays have proven to be insensitive and have thus been ruled out from diagnostic purposes. Therefore, Tcd B detection via sandwich-type chemiluminescent immunoassay was proposed as a straightforward approach with potential diagnostic applicability. Here, two high-affinity anti-Tcd B monoclonal antibodies were successfully identified and implemented in a fully-automated magnetic-particle-based chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLEIA). In this test, toxin B was sandwiched between the anti-toxin B antibody-coated magnetic particles and alkaline phosphate-labeled anti-toxin B antibodies. Compared with traditional techniques, the proposed immunoassay demonstrated high sensitivity for toxin B identification and was further optimized to achieve a linear response ranging from 0.12 to 150 ng/mL with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.47 ng/mL. Importantly, the entire process could be completed in less than 30 minutes. The proposed assay was used to detect toxin B in 104 randomly-selected human stool samples and delivered similar results to those of a commercial ELISA kit, highlighting its great potential for rapid and efficient toxin B determination in human stool specimens.
| S-EPMC7476116 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A disproportional increase of circulating GAD65 within hours from an intraportal islet allotransplantation has been validated as biomarker of beta cell loss and poor functional outcome. More sensitive assays are, however, needed to allow detection of episodes of subtle beta cell loss during late-stage graft rejection or in the peri-onset period of type 1 diabetes. We applied the same sandwich monoclonal antibody couple reactive towards the C- and N-terminus of GAD65 on three advanced immunoassay platforms-the Cytometric Bead Array (CBA, Becton, Dickinson and Company), ElectroChemiLuminescence ImmunoAssay (ECLIA, Meso Scale Discovery) and digital ELISA technology (Single Molecule Array-SIMOA, Quanterix. We then compared analytical performance (linearity, imprecision, limit of detection and functional sensitivity), correlation of results, and practicality. All evaluated techniques showed linearity up to at least 500 ng/dL (76.9 pmol/L). SIMOA achieved the lowest imprecision. The 3 platforms correlate well with each other and could all detect subpicomolar concentrations of GAD65 in plasma, but only SIMOA and CBA could quantify down to that range. SIMOA can achieve the highest sample throughput. The three methods tested allow sensitive detection of GAD65, but SIMOA appears best suited for automated quantification of subpicomolar concentrations.
| S-EPMC5843250 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has traditionally been used to detect myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3) antibodies, although it is time-consuming and physically demanding. As a novel and highly effective immunoassay, we compared chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) with ELISA to verify the application value of CIA in MPO and PR3 antibodies detection.MethodsBy ELISA and CIA, serum levels of anti-MPO and anti-PR3 antibodies were measured in 63 anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients (AAV group), including 47 microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) patients and 16 granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) patients, in addition, 68 patients in interference control group (IC group), 19 healthy subjects in healthy control group (HC group). We compared MPO and PR3 antibodies levels and positive rates measured by these two methods among groups. Relationship and coincidence rate between ELISA and CIA were investigated. Diagnostic values for clinical outcomes for MPO and PR3 antibodies were assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsIn AAV patients, when detecting anti-MPO (r = .90) and anti-PR3 (r = .81), CIA was highly correlated with ELISA, companying with highly total (88.89%, 92.06%, respectively) and positive coincidence rates (84.78%, 77.27%, respectively). In HC group, anti-PR3 positive rate detected by both immunoassay were 0, anti-MPO almost were 0, which without statistically significant difference (P = .32). In IC group, the total (76.47%, 58.82, respectively) and positive coincidence rates (48.38%, 30.00%, respectively) of anti-MPO and anti-PR3 were the lowest, but the negative coincidence rates reached 100%. By CIA, similar to ELISA, the levels of anti-MPO were significantly higher both in AAV patients (56.00; [4.40-235.30]) and MPA patients (98.00; [27.90-324.70]) compared with either IC group (3.20; [3.20-18.55) (P < .0001) or HC group (3.20; [3.20-3.20]) (P < .0001), yielded an area under curve (AUC) of 0.76 for AAV and 0.89 for MPA, the concentration of anti-PR3 in GPA group (66.65; [24.43-150.00]) was significantly higher than that in IC group (2.3; [2.3-10.95]) (P < .0001) and HC group (2.3; [2.3-2.3]) (P < .0001), with an AUC of 0.92.ConclusionSimilar to ELISA, CIA was competent to detect MPO and PR3 antibodies in AAV patients and healthy population, thus distinguish AAV patients from IC group and HC group and effectively diagnose MPA and GPA.
| S-EPMC7891508 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) caused by a severe functional deficiency in ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type I repeats-13), the specific von Willebrand factor (VWF) cleaving protease. ADAMTS13 activity is essential to diagnose TTP but remains challenging to assess, as reference ADAMTS13 activity assays are manual and time consuming. Current techniques also lack robustness in low detectable ADAMTS13 activity range, which could prove problematic for therapy-driven monitoring.ObjectivesThe HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 activity assay is a fast, automated chemiluminescent assay, the performance of which remains to be evaluated prospectively on very large cohorts of patients with TMA and in real-life conditions.Patients and methodsOur study was conducted over two successive sequences: a retrospective evaluation followed by a "real-life" prospective evaluation. Overall, we evaluated the HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 activity assay on 539 citrated plasma samples. We extensively studied linearity, limit of detection, contamination, intra-assay and interassay precisions with a specific focus on levels < 25 IU/dL. Diagnostic performances for the detection of < 10 IU/dL ADAMTS13 activity and overall method comparison were conducted with the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRETS)-VWF73 assay as the reference method.ResultsTechnical performance proved excellent. Robustness in low detectable ADAMTS13 activity range was good, potentially qualifying this assay for therapy-driven monitoring. Comparison with the FRETS-VWF73 assay was satisfactory (r 2 = .83, P < .0001) as were the diagnostic performances for acute-phase TTP (specificity, 99.7%; positive predictive value, 99.2%).ConclusionThe HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 activity assay is a fast, reliable, automated technique well adapted as a first-line ADAMTS13 activity assay for TTP diagnosis and follow-up.
| S-EPMC7845081 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Fragmented cytokeratin 18 (fCK18) released from epithelial cells undergoing apoptosis is widely studied in various diseases. However, fCK18 measurement is not utilized in clinical practice due to imprecise disease-state cutoff values. Therefore, we set out to generate new monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and a recombinant fCK18 (rfCK18) calibrator in an effort to develop a highly sensitive chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). New capture mAb (K18-624) had a high binding ability compared to the current commercial antibody. New detection mAb (K18-328) recognized 323S-340G of CK18. A rfCK18 was expressed in the soluble fraction of E. coli when the N-terminal region (260 amino acid residues) of CK18 was truncated. Analysis of performance and measurement of human fCK18 were evaluated using K18-624 and K18-328 in a highly sensitive CLEIA. The coefficients of variation (CV) for within-run and between-day repeatability were below 10% and the recoveries were in the range of 15%. The detection sensitivity was 0.056 ng/mL. Serum fCK18 levels were significantly increased in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients when compared to healthy individuals. Our new fCK18 mAbs showed high affinity and sensitivity. CLEIA using our new antibodies will be useful in measuring fCK18 in human blood thereby generating accurate clinical diagnoses of human liver diseases.
| S-EPMC8440549 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Antibody-based therapeutics are of great value for the treatment of human diseases. In addition to functional activity, affinity or physico-chemical properties, antibody specificity is considered to be one of the most crucial attributes for safety and efficacy. Consequently, appropriate studies are required before entering clinical trials. High content protein arrays are widely applied to assess antibody specificity, but this commercial solution can only be applied to final therapeutic antibody candidates because such arrays are expensive and their throughput is limited. A flexible, high-throughput and economical assay that allows specificity testing of IgG or Fab molecules during early discovery is described here. The 384-well microtiter plate assay contains a comprehensive panel of 32 test proteins and uses electrochemiluminescence as readout. The Protein Panel Profiling ( 3P) was used to analyze marketed therapeutic antibodies that all showed highly specific binding profiles. Subsequently, 3P was applied to antibody candidates from early discovery and the results compared well with those obtained with a commercially available high content protein chip. Our results suggest that 3P can be applied as an additional filter for lead selection, allowing the identification of favorable antibody candidates in early discovery and thereby increasing the speed and possibility of success in drug development.
| S-EPMC3893238 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is required for estimating population seroprevalence and vaccine response studies. It may also increase case identification when used as an adjunct to routine molecular testing. We performed a validation study and evaluated the use of automated high-throughput assays in a field study of COVID-19-affected care facilities.MethodsSix automated assays were assessed: 1) DiaSorin LIAISONTM SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG; 2) Abbott ARCHITECTTM SARS-CoV-2 IgG; 3) Ortho VITROSTM Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total; 4) VITROSTM Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG; 5) Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total Assay; and 6) Roche ElecsysTM Anti-SARS-CoV-2. The validation study included 107 samples (42 known positive; 65 presumed negative). The field study included 296 samples (92 PCR positive; 204 PCR negative or not PCR tested). All samples were tested by the six assays.ResultsAll assays had sensitivities >90% in the field study, while in the validation study, 5/6 assays were >90% sensitive and DiaSorin was 79% sensitive. Specificities and negative predictive values were >95% for all assays. Field study estimated positive predictive values at 1-10% disease prevalence were 100% for Siemens, Abbott and Roche, while DiaSorin and Ortho assays had lower PPVs at 1% prevalence, but PPVs increased at 5-10% prevalence. In the field study, addition of serology increased diagnoses by 16% compared to PCR testing alone.ConclusionsAll assays evaluated in this study demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for samples collected at least 14 days post-symptom onset, while sensitivity was variable 0-14 days after infection. The addition of serology to the outbreak investigations increased case detection by 16%.
| S-EPMC8282439 | biostudies-literature