Dataset Information

Prognostic Significance of Post-Procedural Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Systolic Dysfunction.

ABSTRACT: Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is associated with a good prognosis; nevertheless, the effect of post-procedural systolic function on a patient's prognosis remains uncertain. Methods?and?Results: Of 1,077 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation, the prognosis of 150 patients with abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; <50%) was evaluated. Patients were categorized as having reduced LVEF (rEF; LVEF <40%), mid-range ejection fraction (mrEF; 40%?LVEF<50%), or preserved LVEF (pEF; LVEF ?50%). Post-procedural LVEF, evaluated 3 months after the procedure, was post-rEF in 28 patients (19%), post-mrEF in 49 (33%), and post-pEF in 73 (49%). During the median follow-up of 31 months, the cumulative ratios of the composite outcome (heart failure hospitalization or death) in the post-rEF, post-mrEF, and post-pEF groups were 18%, 5%, and 2%, respectively, at 1 year and 50%, 13%, and 4%, respectively, at 3 years (P<0.0001). The post-rEF group had a 4.5- to 5.0-fold higher risk of the outcome compared with the post-pEF group, whereas the post-mrEF group showed no risk after adjusting for confounders, including age ?65 years, preprocedural LVEF category, and recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia. Conclusions: Patients with post-mrEF had a comparable prognosis to those with post-pEF over a relatively long follow-up, whereas those with post-rEF had the poorest outcome of the 3 groups, regardless of preprocedural LVEF status.

SUBMITTER: Yazaki K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7937527 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic Significance of Post-Procedural Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Systolic Dysfunction.

Yazaki Kyoichiro K Ejima Koichiro K Kataoka Shohei S Higuchi Satoshi S Kanai Miwa M Yagishita Daigo D Shoda Morio M Hagiwara Nobuhisa N

Circulation reports 20201127 12

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is associated with a good prognosis; nevertheless, the effect of post-procedural systolic function on a patient's prognosis remains uncertain. Methods and Results: Of 1,077 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation, the prognosis of 150 patients with abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; <50%) was evaluated. Patients were categorized as having reduced LVEF (rEF; LVEF <40%), mid-range ejection fraction (mrEF; ...[more]

PMID: 33693200

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsAtrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of heart failure (HF); however, little focus has been placed on the prevention of HF in patients with AF. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an established echocardiographic parameter in HF patients. We sought to investigate the association of LVEF with HF events in AF patients without pre-existing HF.Methods and resultsThe Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in Fushimi-ku, Japan. In this analysis, we excluded patients with pre-existing HF (defined as having one of the following: prior HF hospitalization, New York Heart Association class ≥ 2 in association with heart disease, or LVEF < 40%). Among 3233 AF patients without pre-existing HF, we investigated 2459 patients with the data of LVEF at enrolment. We divided the patients into three groups stratified by LVEF [mildly reduced LVEF (40-49%), below normal LVEF (50-59%), and normal LVEF (≥60%)] and compared the backgrounds and incidence of HF hospitalization between the groups. Of 2459 patients [mean age: 72.4 ± 10.5 years, female: 917 (37%), paroxysmal AF: 1405 (57%), and mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score: 3.0 ± 1.6], the mean LVEF was 66 ± 8% [mildly reduced LVEF: 114 patients (5%), below normal LVEF: 300 patients (12%), and normal LVEF: 2045 patients (83%)]. Patients with lower LVEF demonstrated lower prevalence of female and paroxysmal AF (both P < 0.01), but age and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score were comparable between the three groups (both P > 0.05). During the median follow-up period of 6.0 years, 255 patients (10%) were hospitalized for HF (annual incidence: 1.9% per person-year). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that lower LVEF strata were independently associated with the risk of HF [mildly reduced LVEF (40-49%): hazard ratio = 2.98, 95% confidence interval = 1.99-4.45 and below normal LVEF (50-59%): hazard ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval = 1.44-2.82, compared with normal LVEF (≥60%)] after adjustment by age, sex, type of AF, and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score. LVEF < 60% was significantly associated with the higher risk of HF hospitalization across all major subgroups without significant interaction (P for interaction; all P > 0.05). LVEF had an independent and incremental prognostic value for HF hospitalization in addition to natriuretic peptide levels in AF patients without pre-existing HF.ConclusionsLower LVEF was significantly associated with the higher incidence of HF hospitalization in AF patients without pre-existing HF, leading to the future risk stratification for and prevention of incident HF in AF patients.

Project description:PurposeTo determine whether left ventricular (LV) extracellular volume (ECV) expansion is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) or AF-mediated LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) while minimizing the influence of biologic and imaging methodologic confounders.Materials and methodsThis study examined the prevalence of LV ECV expansion in 137 patients with AF (mean age, 62 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 92 male patients and 45 female patients; 83 paroxysmal and 54 persistent) who underwent preablation cardiovascular MRI. Biologic confounders were minimized by measuring the ECV fraction and excluding patients with severe LV hypertrophy, defined as wall thickness greater than 1.5 cm. Imaging confounders were minimized by using an arrhythmia-insensitive-rapid (AIR) cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequence. Other cardiac functional parameters, including LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area, were assessed using cine cardiovascular MRI. A substudy was conducted in 32 patients with no AF (mean age, 54 years ± 16) in sinus rhythm to establish control values and convert these values between the AIR sequence and literature-based modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) values.ResultsThe mean ECV was not significantly different (P > .05) between patients with AF with a normal LVEF (24.5% ± 2.8; n = 107), patients with AF with LVSD (24.5% ± 2.5; n = 30), and patients with no AF (24.4% ± 3.8; n = 32), but there was a significant interaction between ECV and CHA2DS2-VASc score (P = .045). Compared with the literature data obtained from healthy control patients scanned using MOLLI, 99.3% of patients with AF had ECV below the fibrosis cutoff point (32.8% when converted from MOLLI T1 mapping to AIR T1 mapping), including a subset of patients with AF (n = 28) with low CHA2DS2-VASc score (0/1 for men/women).ConclusionStudy results suggest that an LV ECV expansion is not associated with AF or AF-mediated LVSD. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Stillman in this issue.

Project description:BackgroundManaging patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and comorbid heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is of clinical importance but a great challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of the combined radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedure in AF patients complicated with systolic HF.MethodsAF patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF who underwent the combined RFCA and LAAC procedure were prospectively enrolled in the LAACablation registry. The procedural complications and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Another cohort of AF patients with systolic HF who did not undergo either RFCA or LAAC were used for prognosis comparison.ResultsAmong 802 AF patients who underwent the combined procedure, 65 patients were comorbid with systolic HF (25 with HFrEF and 40 with HFmrEF). The overall procedural complication rate was 9.2%, which was mainly attributed to acute decompensated HF (6.2%). Accompanied with markedly reduced AF burden (from median [25th, 75th percentile]: 100 [100, 100] to 0 [0, 1.2]%, p < 0.001), upward trajectories of cardiac function were observed in 51 (78.4%) patients, showing improvement in New York Heart Classification (p < 0.01), natriuretic peptide levels (from 1492 [809, 3259] to 413 [163, 880] pg/mL, p < 0.001) and left ventricular EF (from 42.6 ± 5.3 to 53.8 ± 8.2%, p < 0.001). During the 27-month follow-up period, death, thromboembolism, major bleeding, and HF rehospitalization were observed in three, one, one, and four patients, respectively. The observed event rates showed a significant reduction compared with the non-procedure AF-HF cohort (n = 138; for composite endpoint: hazard ratio: 2.509, 95% confidence interval: 1.415-4.449, p = 0.002) and with the respective rates predicted by risk scores.ConclusionsCombining RFCA and LAAC achieves acceptable safety and credible long-term efficacy in AF patients with systolic HF. Further randomized studies are warranted in a larger patient cohort.

Dataset Information

Prognostic Significance of Post-Procedural Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Systolic Dysfunction.

Publications

Prognostic Significance of Post-Procedural Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Systolic Dysfunction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets