Dataset Information

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?

ABSTRACT:

Background

The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication.

Methods

We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to May 24th, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and synthesized using STATA 14, values were then pooled and utilized in order to assess the overall impact of AAPR on patient's prognosis.

Results

In total, 18 studies involving 25 cohorts with 7019 cases were incorporated. Pooled results originated from both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR?=?2.14, 95%CI:1.83-2.51, random-effects model; HR?=?1.93, 95%CI:1.75-2.12, fixed-effects model; respectively) suggested that decreased AAPR had adverse effect on overall survival (OS). Similarly, pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analysis of fixed-effects model, evinced that decreased AAPR also had adverse effect on disease-free survival (DFS) (HR?=?1.81, 95%CI:1.60-2.04, I² =?29.5%, P?=?0.174; HR?=?1.69, 95%CI:1.45-1.97, I² =?13.0%, P?=?0.330; respectively), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR?=?1.71, 95%CI:1.31-2.22, I² =?0.0%, P?=?0.754; HR?=?1.90, 95%CI:1.16-3.12, I² =?0.0%, P?=?0.339; respectively), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR?=?2.22, 95%CI:1.67-2.95, I² =?5.6%, P?=?0.347; HR?=?1.88, 95%CI:1.38-2.57, I² =?26.4%, P?=?0.244; respectively). Admittedly, heterogeneity and publication bias existed, but stratification of univariate meta-analytic results, as well as adjusted meta-analytic results via trim and fill method, all showed that AAPR still significantly correlated with poor OS despite of confounding factors.

Conclusions

In summary, decreased AAPR had adverse effect on prognosis in cancer patients. As an inexpensive and convenient ratio derived from liver function test, AAPR might become a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers.

SUBMITTER: An L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7938577 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?

An Lin L Yin Wei-Tian WT Sun Da-Wei DW

BMC cancer 20210308 1

<h4>Background</h4>The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication.<h4>Methods</h4>We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to May 24th, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and synthesized using STATA 14, values were then pooled and utilized in order to assess the overall im ...[more]

PMID: 33685425

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRecent evidence suggests that albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio (AAPR) functions as a novel prognostic marker in several malignancies. However, whether it can predict the prognosis of unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. Herein, we seek to investigate this possibility by a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study in which 419 patients diagnosed with unresectable PDAC and receiving chemotherapy were recruited. Patients were stratified based on the cutoff value of AAPR. The PSM analysis was performed to identify 156 well-balanced patients in each group for overall survival (OS) comparison and subgroup analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to examine the potential of AAPR to indicate the prognosis of unresectable PDAC. The prediction performance of conventional model and combined model including AAPR was compared using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and concordance index (C-index).ResultsWe identified an AAPR of 0.4 to be the optimal cutoff for OS prediction. Patients with AAPR≤0.4 had significantly shorter OS compared with patients with AAPR> 0.4 (6.4 versus 9.3 months; P < 0.001). Based on the PSM cohort and entire cohort, multivariate Cox analysis revealed that high pretreatment for AAPR was an independent marker predicting favorable survival in unresectable PDAC (hazard ratio, 0.556; 95% confidence interval, 0.408 to 0.757; P < 0.001). Significant differences in OS were observed in all subgroups except for the group of patients age ≤ 60. Combined prognostic model including AAPR had lower AIC and higher C-index than conventional prognostic model.ConclusionsPretreatment AAPR servers as an independent prognostic indicator for patients with unresectable PDAC. Inclusion of AAPR improved the prediction performance of conventional prognostic model, potentially helping clinicians to identify patients at high risk and guide individualized treatment.

Project description:BackgroundBreast cancer patients who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have favorable outcomes. Reliable predictors for pCR help to identify patients who will benefit most from NAC. The pretreatment serum albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) has been shown to be a prognostic predictor in several malignancies, but its predictive value for pCR in breast cancer is still unknown. This study aims to investigate the predictive role of AAPR in breast cancer patients and develop an AAPR-based nomogram for pCR rate prediction.MethodsA total of 780 patients who received anthracycline and taxane-based NAC from January 2012 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of AAPR and other clinicopathological factors. A nomogram was developed and calibrated based on multivariate logistic regression. A validation cohort of 234 patients was utilized to further validate the predictive performance of the model. The C-index, calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discrimination, calibration and clinical value of the model.ResultsPatients with a lower AAPR (<0.583) had a significantly reduced pCR rate (OR 2.228, 95% CI 1.246-3.986, p=0.007). Tumor size, clinical nodal status, histological grade, PR, Ki67 and AAPR were identified as independent predictors and included in the final model. The nomogram was used as a graphical representation of the model. The nomogram had satisfactory calibration and discrimination in both the training cohort and validation cohort (the C-index was 0.792 in the training cohort and 0.790 in the validation cohort). Furthermore, DCA indicated a clinical net benefit from the nomogram.ConclusionsPretreatment serum AAPR is a potentially valuable predictor for pCR in breast cancer patients who receive NAC. The AAPR-based nomogram is a noninvasive tool with favorable predictive accuracy for pCR, which helps to make individualized treatment strategy decisions.

Dataset Information

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets