Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Surgical treatment of joint burn scar contracture: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term outcome evaluation.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Burn patients often have functional problems due to joint scar contracture. Patients suffering from such contracture often experience considerable limitations in daily life. Therefore, surgical treatment is often necessary. Skin grafts, especially full-thickness skin grafts and flaps remain the most commonly used surgical methods in clinical practice. However, there are no clear guidelines stating which technique is the most effective treatment. Herein, we conducted a retrospective cohort study over 10 years of experience at a single center to investigate whether flaps or FTSGs exhibit a better long-term effect.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with joint burn scar contracture and collected data related to patient demographic profiles, and detailed descriptions of the scars, surgical procedures, and follow-up were collected. We performed follow-up evaluation of three aspects: adverse events (recontracture, ache, and pruritus), satisfaction scores for function and aesthetics, and scar quality (Vancouver Scar Scale score).

Results

Follow-up results 1 year after surgery from 88 patients were analyzed. In total, 4 (10%) patients in the flap group and 13 (27.1%) patients in the FTSG group had recontracture; the incidence of recontracture was lower in the flap group than in the FTSG group (P=0.043). The functional satisfaction score of the flap group was higher than that of the FTSG group (P=0.027). Moreover, follow-up results 5 year after surgery for 47 patients were analyzed. In total, 1 (4.8%) patient in the flap group and 7 (26.9%) patients in the FTSG group had recontracture; the incidence of recontracture was significantly lower in the flap group than in the FTSG group (P=0.044). The functional satisfaction score in the flap group was higher than that of the FTSG group (P=0.041). In this study, no significant differences in scar quality were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

If conditions permit, the application of different types of flaps may represent a better choice than FTSGs in terms of reducing the recontracture rate and improving joint function.

SUBMITTER: Ma Z 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7944269 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Surgical treatment of joint burn scar contracture: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term outcome evaluation.

Ma Zhouji Z   Mo Ran R   Chen Chen C   Meng Xueyong X   Tan Qian Q  

Annals of translational medicine 20210201 4


<h4>Background</h4>Burn patients often have functional problems due to joint scar contracture. Patients suffering from such contracture often experience considerable limitations in daily life. Therefore, surgical treatment is often necessary. Skin grafts, especially full-thickness skin grafts and flaps remain the most commonly used surgical methods in clinical practice. However, there are no clear guidelines stating which technique is the most effective treatment. Herein, we conducted a retrospe  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8379432 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6754005 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6021063 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10928630 | biostudies-literature
2022-09-20 | GSE211577 | GEO
| S-EPMC5382583 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5785627 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7134553 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5850550 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11308821 | biostudies-literature