Dataset Information

Can the early use of botulinum toxin in post stroke spasticity reduce contracture development? A randomised controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Does early treatment of spasticity with botulinum-toxin (BoNTA), in (hyper)acute stroke patients without arm-function, reduce contractures and improve function.

Design

Randomised placebo-controlled-trial.

Setting

Specialised stroke-unit.

Participants & intervention

Patients with an Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) grasp-score⩽2 who developed spasticity within six-weeks of a first stroke were randomised to receive injections of: 0.9%sodium-chloride solution (placebo) or onabotulinumtoxin-A (treatment).

Outcome-measures

Spasticity, contractures, splint use and arm function (ARAT) were taken at baseline, 12-weeks post-injection and six-months after stroke. Additionally, spasticity and contractures were measured at weeks-two, four and six post-injection.

Results

Ninety three patients were randomised. Mean time to intervention was 18-days (standard deviation = 9.3). Spasticity was lower in the treatment group with difference being significant between week-2 to 12 (elbow) and week-2 to 6 (wrist). Mean-difference (MD) varied between -8.5(95% CI -17 to 0) to -9.4(95% CI -14 to -5) µV.Contracture formation was slower in the treatment group. Passive range of motion was higher in the treatment group and was significant at week-12 (elbow MD6.6 (95% CI -0.7 to -12.6)) and week-6 (wrist MD11.8 (95% CI 3.8 to 19.8)). The use of splints was lower in the treatment group odds ratio was 7.2 (95% CI 1.5 to 34.1) and 4.2 (95% CI 1.3 to 14.0) at week-12 and month-6 respectively.Arm-function was not significantly different between the groups MD2.4 (95% CI -5.3 to 10.1) and 2.9 (95% CI -5.8 to 11.6) at week-12 and month-6 respectively.

Conclusion

BoNTA reduced spasticity and contractures after stroke and effects lasted for approximately 12-weeks. BoNTA reduced the need for concomitant contracture treatment and did not interfere with recovery of arm function.

Trial registration

EudraCT (2010-021257-39) and ClinicalTrials.gov-Identifier: NCT01882556.

SUBMITTER: Lindsay C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7944432 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo test the feasibility and efficacy of the VibroTactile Stimulation (VTS) Glove, a wearable device that provides VTS to the impaired limb to reduce spastic hypertonia.DesignProspective 2-arm intervention study-including 1 group of patients who use Botulinum toxin (BTX-A) for spasticity and 1 group of patients who do not use BTX-A.SettingParticipants were recruited through rehabilitation and neurology clinics.ParticipantsPatients with chronic stroke (N=20; mean age=54 years, mean time since stroke=6.9 years). Patients who were previously receiving the standard of care (BTX-A injection) were eligible to participate and started the intervention 12 weeks after their last injection.InterventionParticipants were instructed to use the VTS Glove for 3 hours daily, at home or during everyday activities, for 8 weeks.Main outcome measuresSpasticity was assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale and the Modified Tardieu Scale at baseline and then at 2-week intervals for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were the difference from baseline and at week 8 (end of VTS Glove use) and week 12 (4 weeks after stopping VTS Glove use). Patients who were receiving BTX-A were also assessed during the 12 weeks preceding the start of VTS Glove use to monitor the effect of BTX-A on spastic hypertonia. Range of motion and participant feedback were also studied.ResultsA clinically meaningful difference in spastic hypertonia was found during and after daily VTS Glove use. Modified Ashworth and Modified Tardieu scores were reduced by an average of 0.9 (P=.0014) and 0.7 (P=.0003), respectively, at week 8 of daily VTS Glove use, and by 1.1 (P=.00025) and 0.9 (P=.0001), respectively, 1 month after stopping VTS Glove use. For participants who used BTX-A, 6 out of 11 showed greater change in Modified Ashworth ratings during VTS Glove use (mean=-1.8 vs mean=-1.6 with BTX-A) and 8 out of 11 showed their lowest level of symptoms during VTS Glove use (vs BTX-A).ConclusionsDaily stimulation from the VTS Glove provides relief of spasticity and hypertonia. For more than half of the participants who had regularly used BTX-A, the VTS Glove provided equal or greater symptom relief.

Project description:ObjectivesThe therapeutic effects of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) are well documented in upper limb spasticity. However, several factors may influence treatment efficacy, including targeting of neuromuscular junctions (NMJs). We examined whether NMJ-targeted BoNT injections were non-inferior, in terms of efficacy, to current injection practices.DesignOpen-label prospective evaluator-blinded study.SettingConducted across 20 medical centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden (24 September 2012 to 11 March 2015).ParticipantsAged ˃18 years with upper limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS] score of 2 or 3) following stroke or traumatic brain injury, had received ≥2 consecutive BoNT-A treatment cycles (the latest of which was abobotulinumtoxinA [aboBoNT-A]) and needed BoNT-A retreatment (same modality as previous cycle). Patients requiring aboBoNT-A doses >800units were excluded. In total, 88 patients were randomised (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), most were male (n=58/88, 65.9%) and 54/88 (61.4%) completed the study (per protocol [PP] population).InterventionsRandomisation (1:1) to receive a single dose of aboBoNT-A (≤800 U) according to either current clinical practice (300 U/mL) or as an NMJ-targeted injection (100 U/mL).Primary outcome measureProportion of patients with a ≥1 level reduction from baseline in MAS score at week 4 post-injection (responders).ResultsIn the ITT population, the proportion of responders at elbow flexors was 72.7% in the current practice group and 56.8% in the NMJ-targeted group (adjusted difference -0.1673 [95% CIs: -0.3630 to 0.0284]; p=0.0986). Similar results were observed in the PP population (69.0% vs 68.0%, respectively, adjusted difference 0.0707 [-0.1948 to 0.3362]; p=0.6052).ConclusionsOwing to the limited number of participants, non-inferiority of NMJ-targeted injections could not be determined. However, there was no statistical difference between groups. Larger studies are needed confirm whether the two techniques offer comparable efficacy.Trial registration numberNCT01682148.

Project description:BackgroundThe anti-spasticity efficacy of botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection has been well established for patients with chronic stroke; however, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), i.e. focused shockwave (FSW) and radial shockwave (RSW), has recently been applied. We aimed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of BoNT vs. ESWT in the reduction of spasticity among stroke survivors.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from the earliest record to September 2021 for randomized controlled trials. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) on the reduction of the Modified Ashworth Scale before or at the 6th post-treatment week (short-term) and between the 7th and 12th weeks (mid-term) after the intervention were calculated. Ranking probabilities of the WMD were simulated to determine which treatment had the potential to possess the best effectiveness. inplasy.com registration: INPLASY202170018.FindingsA total of 33 studies comprising 1,930 patients were enrolled. The network meta-analysis revealed that BoNT injections, FSW and RSW were better in spasticity reduction than the control treatment(s) at the short term, with WMDs of -0.69 (95% CI, -0.87 to -0.50), -0.36 (95% CI, -0.69 to -0.03) and -0.62 (95% CI, -0.84 to -0.40), respectively. Likewise, mid-term effects of BoNT injections, FSW and RSW also revealed superiority, with WMDs of -0.44 (95% CI, -0.62 to -0.26), -0.74 (95% CI, -1.26 to -0.23) and -0.79 (95% CI, -1.07 to -0.51), respectively. Ranking probability analysis revealed that RSW had the highest probability of being the best treatment for spasticity reduction at the short-term (62.2%) and mid-term (72.3%) periods during the follow up.InterpretationBoNT injections and ESWT are effective in alleviating post-stroke spasticity at the mid-term. The effectiveness of ESWT was comparable to BoNT injections, and RSW had the potential to be the best treatment for spasticity reduction among the three treatment options. More prospective trials incorporating head-to-head comparisons of BoNT injections vs. ESWT are needed to validate the role of ESWT in reducing post-stroke spasticity.FundingThe current research project was supported by (1) National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch; (2) Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106-2314-B-002-180-MY3 and 109-2314-B-002-114-MY3); 3) Taiwan Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.