Dataset Information

Sleep health, diseases, and pain syndromes: findings from an electronic health record biobank.

ABSTRACT:

Study objectives

Implementation of electronic health record biobanks has facilitated linkage between clinical and questionnaire data and enabled assessments of relationships between sleep health and diseases in phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS). In the Mass General Brigham Biobank, a large health system-based study, we aimed to systematically catalog associations between time in bed, sleep timing, and weekly variability with clinical phenotypes derived from ICD-9/10 codes.

Methods

Self-reported habitual bed and wake times were used to derive variables: short (<7 hours) and long (≥9 hours) time in bed, sleep midpoint, social jetlag, and sleep debt. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test cross-sectional and prospective associations, respectively, adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and employment status and further adjusted for body mass index.

Results

In cross-sectional analysis (n = 34,651), sleep variable associations were most notable for circulatory system, mental disorders, and endocrine/metabolic phenotypes. We observed the strongest associations for short time in bed with obesity, for long time in bed and sleep midpoint with major depressive disorder, for social jetlag with hypercholesterolemia, and for sleep debt with acne. In prospective analysis (n = 24,065), we observed short time in bed associations with higher incidence of acute pain and later sleep midpoint and higher sleep debt and social jetlag associations with higher incidence of major depressive disorder.

Conclusions

Our analysis reinforced that sleep health is a multidimensional construct, corroborated robust known findings from traditional cohort studies, and supported the application of PheWAS as a promising tool for advancing sleep research. Considering the exploratory nature of PheWAS, careful interrogation of novel findings is imperative.

SUBMITTER: Dashti HS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7953212 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:We aimed to detect cross-sectional phenotype and polygenic risk score (PRS) associations between sleep duration and prevalent diseases using the Partners Biobank, a hospital-based cohort study linking electronic medical records (EMR) with genetic information. Disease prevalence was determined from EMR, and sleep duration was self-reported. A PRS for sleep duration was derived using 78 previously associated SNPs from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for self-reported sleep duration. We tested for associations between (1) self-reported sleep duration and 22 prevalent diseases (n = 30 251), (2) the PRS and self-reported sleep duration (n = 6903), and (3) the PRS and the 22 prevalent diseases (n = 16 033). For observed PRS-disease associations, we tested causality using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). In the age-, sex-, and race-adjusted model, U-shaped associations were observed for sleep duration and asthma, depression, hypertension, insomnia, obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, and type 2 diabetes, where both short and long sleepers had higher odds for these diseases than normal sleepers (p < 2.27 × 10-3). Next, we confirmed associations between the PRS and longer sleep duration (0.65 ± 0.19 SD minutes per effect allele; p = 7.32 × 10-04). The PRS collectively explained 1.4% of the phenotypic variance in sleep duration. After adjusting for age, sex, genotyping array, and principal components of ancestry, we observed that the PRS was also associated with congestive heart failure (CHF; p = 0.015), obesity (p = 0.019), hypertension (p = 0.039), restless legs syndrome (RLS; p = 0.041), and insomnia (p = 0.049). Associations were maintained following additional adjustment for obesity status, except for hypertension and insomnia. For all diseases, except RLS, carrying a higher genetic burden of the 78 sleep duration-increasing alleles (i.e. higher sleep duration PRS) associated with lower odds for prevalent disease. In MR, we estimated causal associations between genetically defined longer sleep duration with decreased risk of CHF (inverse variance weighted [IVW] OR per minute of sleep [95% CI] = 0.978 [0.961-0.996]; p = 0.019) and hypertension (IVW OR [95% CI] = 0.993 [0.986-1.000]; p = 0.049), and increased risk of RLS (IVW OR [95% CI] = 1.018 [1.000-1.036]; p = 0.045). By validating the PRS for sleep duration and identifying cross-phenotype associations, we lay the groundwork for future investigations on the intersection between sleep, genetics, clinical measures, and diseases using large EMR datasets.

Project description:Objective To ascertain long term cardiovascular outcomes in patients whose chest pain remained undiagnosed six months after first presentation.Design Cohort study.Setting UK electronic health record database (CALIBER) linking primary care, secondary care, coronary registry, and death registry information.Participants 172?180 adults aged ?18 from 223 general practices presenting with a first episode of recorded chest pain, classified from medical records as diagnosed (non-coronary condition or angina) or undiagnosed (cause unattributed) at first consultation between 2002 and 2009 and with no previous record of cardiovascular disease.Main outcome measures Fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events over 5.5 years' follow-up. Adjustments were made for age, sex, deprivation, body mass index, smoking status, year of index presentation, and previous records of diabetes or hypertension or previous prescriptions for lipid lowering drugs.Results At the index presentation, 72.4% of patients (124?688) did not have a cause attributed for their chest pain; 118?687 (95.2%) of these did not receive any type of cardiovascular diagnosis over the next six months. Only a minority of patients in all three groups (non-coronary 2.0% (769 of 39?232); unattributed 11.7% (14?582 of 124?688); angina 31.5% (2606 of 8260)) had a recorded cardiac diagnostic investigation in the first six months after presentation. The long term incidence of cardiovascular events was higher in those whose chest pain remained unattributed after six months (5126 of 109?628; 4.7%) compared with patients with an initial diagnosis of non-coronary pain (1073 of 36?097; 3.0%) (adjusted hazard ratios for 0.5-1 year after presentation: 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.66 to 2.31; for 1-3 years: 1.35, 1.23 to 1.48); for 3-5.5 years: 1.21, 1.08 to 1.37). Owing to the larger number of patients in the unattributed group, there were more excess myocardial infarctions in the long term in this group (214 more than expected based on the rate in the non-coronary group) than in the angina group (132 more than expected). Patients who had cardiac diagnostic investigations in the first six months had a higher long term risk of cardiovascular events, regardless of the initial chest pain label. Incidence of unattributed chest pain and angina decreased between 2002 (124 per 10?000 person years and 13 per 10?000 person years, respectively) and 2009 (107 per 10?000 person years and 5 per 10?000 person years, respectively), but the incidence of chest pain attributed to a non-coronary cause remained stable (37-40 per 10?000 person years). Risk of cardiovascular events did not change over time.Conclusions Most patients with first onset chest pain do not have a diagnosis recorded at presentation or in the subsequent six months, including those who undergo cardiac investigations. These patients have an increased risk of cardiovascular events for at least five years. Efforts to better assess and reduce the cardiovascular risk of such patients are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundGenetic and lifestyle factors have considerable effects on obesity and related diseases, yet their effects in a clinical cohort are unknown. This study in a patient biobank examined associations of a BMI polygenic risk score (PRS), and its interactions with lifestyle risk factors, with clinically measured BMI and clinical phenotypes.MethodsThe Mass General Brigham (MGB) Biobank is a hospital-based cohort with electronic health record, genetic, and lifestyle data. A PRS for obesity was generated using 97 genetic variants for BMI. An obesity lifestyle risk index using survey responses to obesogenic lifestyle risk factors (alcohol, education, exercise, sleep, smoking, and shift work) was used to dichotomize the cohort into high and low obesogenic index based on the population median. Height and weight were measured at a clinical visit. Multivariable linear cross-sectional associations of the PRS with BMI and interactions with the obesity lifestyle risk index were conducted. In phenome-wide association analyses (PheWAS), similar logistic models were conducted for 675 disease outcomes derived from billing codes.ResultsThirty-three thousand five hundred eleven patients were analyzed (53.1% female; age 60.0 years; BMI 28.3 kg/m2), of which 17,040 completed the lifestyle survey (57.5% female; age: 60.2; BMI: 28.1 (6.2) kg/m2). Each standard deviation increment in the PRS was associated with 0.83 kg/m2 unit increase in BMI (95% confidence interval (CI) =0.76, 0.90). There was an interaction between the obesity PRS and obesity lifestyle risk index on BMI. The difference in BMI between those with a high and low obesogenic index was 3.18 kg/m2 in patients in the highest decile of PRS, whereas that difference was only 1.55 kg/m2 in patients in the lowest decile of PRS. In PheWAS, the obesity PRS was associated with 40 diseases spanning endocrine/metabolic, circulatory, and 8 other disease groups. No interactions were evident between the PRS and the index on disease outcomes.ConclusionsIn this hospital-based clinical biobank, obesity risk conferred by common genetic variants was associated with elevated BMI and this risk was attenuated by a healthier patient lifestyle. Continued consideration of the role of lifestyle in the context of genetic predisposition in healthcare settings is necessary to quantify the extent to which modifiable lifestyle risk factors may moderate genetic predisposition and inform clinical action to achieve personalized medicine.

Project description:BackgroundLarge medical centers in urban areas, like Los Angeles, care for a diverse patient population and offer the potential to study the interplay between genetic ancestry and social determinants of health. Here, we explore the implications of genetic ancestry within the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ATLAS Community Health Initiative-an ancestrally diverse biobank of genomic data linked with de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) of UCLA Health patients (N=36,736).MethodsWe quantify the extensive continental and subcontinental genetic diversity within the ATLAS data through principal component analysis, identity-by-descent, and genetic admixture. We assess the relationship between genetically inferred ancestry (GIA) and >1500 EHR-derived phenotypes (phecodes). Finally, we demonstrate the utility of genetic data linked with EHR to perform ancestry-specific and multi-ancestry genome and phenome-wide scans across a broad set of disease phenotypes.ResultsWe identify 5 continental-scale GIA clusters including European American (EA), African American (AA), Hispanic Latino American (HL), South Asian American (SAA) and East Asian American (EAA) individuals and 7 subcontinental GIA clusters within the EAA GIA corresponding to Chinese American, Vietnamese American, and Japanese American individuals. Although we broadly find that self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) is highly correlated with GIA, we still observe marked differences between the two, emphasizing that the populations defined by these two criteria are not analogous. We find a total of 259 significant associations between continental GIA and phecodes even after accounting for individuals' SIRE, demonstrating that for some phenotypes, GIA provides information not already captured by SIRE. GWAS identifies significant associations for liver disease in the 22q13.31 locus across the HL and EAA GIA groups (HL p-value=2.32×10-16, EAA p-value=6.73×10-11). A subsequent PheWAS at the top SNP reveals significant associations with neurologic and neoplastic phenotypes specifically within the HL GIA group.ConclusionsOverall, our results explore the interplay between SIRE and GIA within a disease context and underscore the utility of studying the genomes of diverse individuals through biobank-scale genotyping linked with EHR-based phenotyping.

Project description:BackgroundWith increased use of telehealth, interventions to improve infant sleep environments have not been explored. This study sought to assess the feasibility and efficacy of using electronic health record patient portals to transmit photographs of infant sleep between mothers and healthcare professionals as part of an intervention to promote sleep environments consistent with AAP guidelines.MethodsOne hundred eighty-four mother-newborn dyads consented to participate in a randomized trial requiring patient portal registration within 1 month of delivery. We first assessed feasibility as measured by a) the proportion of consented mothers enrolling in the portal and b) maternal adherence to prompts to submit photographs of their infant sleeping to the research team through the patient portal. Intervention group mothers were prompted at 1 and 2 months; controls were prompted only at 2 months. Efficacy was determined via research assistant review of submitted photographs. These assistants were trained to detect sudden unexplained infant death risk factors utilizing AAP guidelines. Standardized feedback was returned to mothers through the patient portal. We used Fisher's Exact test to assess group differences in guideline adherence at 2 months.ResultsOne hundred nine mothers (59%) enrolled in the patient portal and were randomized to intervention (N = 55) and control (N = 54) groups. 21 (38, 95% CI 25-52%) intervention group participants sent photographs at 1 month and received personalized feedback. Across both groups at 2 months, 40 (37, 95% CI 28-46%) sent photographs; 56% of intervention group participants who submitted photographs met all safe sleep criteria compared with 46% of controls (difference 0.10, 95% CI - 0.26 to 0.46, p = .75). Common reasons for guideline non-adherence were sleeping in a room without a caregiver (43%), loose bedding (15%) and objects (8%) on the sleep surface.ConclusionsUtilizing the patient portal to individualize safe infant sleep is possible, however, we encountered numerous barriers in this trial to assess its effects on promoting safe infant sleep. Photographs of infants sleeping showed substantial non-adherence to AAP guidelines, suggesting further needs for improvement to promote safe infant sleep practices.Trial registrationName: Improving Infant Sleep Safety With the Electronic Health Record; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03662048 ; Date of Registration: September 7, 2018; Data Sharing Statement: None.

Project description:BackgroundThe rapid expansion in the use of electronic health records (EHR) has increased the number of medical errors originating in health information systems (HIS). The sociotechnical approach helps in understanding risks in the development, implementation, and use of EHR and health information technology (HIT) while accounting for complex interactions of technology within the health care system.ObjectiveThis study addresses two important questions: (1) "which of the common EHR error types are associated with perceived high- and extreme-risk severity ratings among EHR users?", and (2) "which variables are associated with high- and extreme-risk severity ratings?"MethodsThis study was a quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive study of EHR users. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire study at the largest hospital district in Finland. Statistical tests included the reliability of the summative scales tested with Cronbach's alpha. Logistic regression served to assess the association of the independent variables to each of the eight risk factors examined.ResultsA total of 2864 eligible respondents provided the final data. Almost half of the respondents reported a high level of risk related to the error type "extended EHR unavailability". The lowest overall risk level was associated with "selecting incorrectly from a list of items". In multivariate analyses, profession and clinical unit proved to be the strongest predictors for high perceived risk. Physicians perceived risk levels to be the highest ( P<.001 in six of eight error types), while emergency departments, operating rooms, and procedure units were associated with higher perceived risk levels ( P<.001 in four of eight error types). Previous participation in eLearning courses on EHR-use was associated with lower risk for some of the risk factors.ConclusionsBased on a large number of Finnish EHR users in hospitals, this study indicates that HIT safety hazards should be taken very seriously, particularly in operating rooms, procedure units, emergency departments, and intensive care units/critical care units. Health care organizations should use proactive and systematic assessments of EHR risks before harmful events occur. An EHR training program should be compulsory for all EHR users in order to address EHR safety concerns resulting from the failure to use HIT appropriately.