Dataset Information

CT-Based Radiomics Signatures for Predicting the Risk Categorization of Thymic Epithelial Tumors.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

This study aims to assess the performance of radiomics approaches based on 3D computed tomography (CT), clinical and semantic features in predicting the pathological classification of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).

Methods

A total of 190 patients who underwent surgical resection and had pathologically confirmed TETs were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT) scans and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans before treatment. A total of 396 hand-crafted radiomics features of each patient were extracted from the volume of interest in NECT and CECT images. We compared three clinical features and six semantic features (observed radiological traits) between patients with TETs. Two triple-classification radiomics models (RMs), two corresponding clinical RMs, and two corresponding clinical-semantic RMs were built to identify the types of the TETs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were useful to evaluate the different models.

Results

Of the 190 patients, 83 had low-risk thymoma, 58 had high-risk thymoma, and 49 had thymic carcinoma. Clinical features (Age) and semantic features (mediastinal fat infiltration, mediastinal lymph node enlargement, and pleural effusion) were significantly different among the groups(P < 0.001). In the validation set, the NECT-based clinical RM (AUC = 0.770 for low-risk thymoma, 0.689 for high-risk thymoma, and 0.783 for thymic carcinoma; ACC = 0.569) performed better than the CECT-based clinical-semantic RM (AUC = 0.785 for low-risk thymoma, 0.576 for high-risk thymoma, and 0.774 for thymic carcinoma; ACC = 0.483).

Conclusions

NECT-based and CECT-based RMs may provide a non-invasive method to distinguish low-risk thymoma, high-risk thymoma, and thymic carcinoma, and NECT-based RMs performed better.

Advances in knowledge

Radiomics models may be used for the preoperative prediction of the pathological classification of TETs.

SUBMITTER: Liu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7953900 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe aim of this study is to develop and compare performance of radiomics signatures using texture features extracted from noncontrast enhanced CT (NECT) and contrast enhanced CT (CECT) images for preoperative predicting risk categorization and clinical stage of thymomas.Materials and methodsBetween January 2010 and October 2018, 199 patients with surgical resection and histopathologically confirmed thymoma were enrolled in this retrospective study. We extracted 841 radiomics features separately from volume of interest (VOI) in NECT and CECT images. The features with poor reproducibility and highly redundancy were removed. Then a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO) logistic regression model with 10-fold cross validation was used for further feature selection and radiomics signatures build. The predictive performances of radiomics signatures were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between radiomics signatures were compared by using Delong test.ResultIn differentiating high risk thymomas from low risk thymomas, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.801(95% CI 0.740-0.863), 0.752 and 0.767 for radiomics signature based on NECT images, and 0.827 (95% CI 0.771 -0.884), 0.798, and 0.722 for radiomics signature based on CECT images. But there was no significant difference (p=0.365) between them. In differentiating advanced stage thymomas from early stage thymomas, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.829 (95%CI 0.757-0.900), 0.712, and 0.806 for radiomics signature based on NECT images and 0.860 (95%CI 0.803-0.917), 0.699, and 0.889 for radiomics signature based on CECT images. There was no significant difference (p=0.069) between them. The accuracy was 0.819 for radiomics signature based on NECT images, 0.869 for radiomics signature based on CECT images, and 0.779 for radiologists. Both radiomics signatures had a better performance than radiologists. But there was significant difference (p = 0.025) only between CECT radiomics signature and radiologists.ConclusionRadiomics signatures based on texture analysis from NECT and CECT images could be utilized as noninvasive biomarkers for differentiating high risk thymomas from low risk thymomas and advanced stage thymomas from early stage thymoma. As a quantitative method, radiomics signature can provide complementary diagnostic information and help to plan personalized treatment for patients with thymomas.

Project description:ObjectiveTo explore the characteristics and risk factors for major mediastinal vessel invasion in different risk grades of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) based on computed tomography (CT) imaging, and to develop prediction models of major mediastinal artery and vein invasion.MethodsOne hundred and twenty-two TET patients confirmed by histopathological analysis who underwent thorax CT were enrolled in this study. Clinical and CT data were retrospectively reviewed for these patients. According to the abutment degree between the tumor and major mediastinal vessels, the arterial invasion was divided into grade I, II, and III (< 25%, 25 - 49%, and ≥ 50%, respectively); the venous invasion was divided into grade I and II (< 50% and ≥ 50%). The degree of vessel invasion was compared among different defined subtypes or stages of TETs using the chi-square tests. The risk factors associated with TET vascular invasion were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsBased on logistic regression analysis, male patients (β = 1.549; odds ratio, 4.824) and the pericardium or pleural invasion (β = 2.209; odds ratio, 9.110) were independent predictors of 25% artery invasion, and the midline location (β = 2.504; odds ratio, 12.234) and mediastinal lymphadenopathy (β = 2.490; odds ratio, 12.06) were independent predictors of 50% artery invasion. As for 50% venous invasion, the risk factors include midline location (β = 2.303; odds ratio, 10.0), maximum tumor diameter larger than 5.9 cm (β = 4.038; odds ratio, 56.736), and pericardial or pleural effusion (β = 1.460; odds ratio, 4.306). The multivariate logistic model obtained relatively high predicting efficacy, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.944, 84.6%, and 91.7% for predicting 50% artery invasion, and 0.913, 81.8%, and 86.0% for 50% venous invasion in TET patients, respectively.ConclusionSeveral CT features can be used as independent predictors of ≥50% artery or venous invasion. A multivariate logistic regression model based on CT features is helpful in predicting the vascular invasion grades in patients with TET.

Project description:To determine the prognostic CT features in patients with untreated thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). Clinical data and CT imaging features of 194 patients with pathologically confirmed TETs were retrospectively reviewed. The subjects included 113 male and 81 female patients between 15 and 78 years of age, with a mean age of 53.8 years. Clinical outcomes were categorized according to whether relapse, metastasis or death occurred within 3 years after the first diagnosis. Associations between clinical outcomes and CT imaging features were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, while the survival status was analyzed by Cox regression. In this study, we analyzed 110 thymic carcinomas, 52 high-risk thymomas and 32 low-risk thymomas. Percentages of poor outcome and patient death in thymic carcinomas were much higher than those in patients with high-risk and low-risk thymomas. In the thymic carcinomas groups, 46 patients (41.8%) experienced tumor progression, local relapse or metastasis and were categorized as having poor outcomes; vessel invasion and pericardial mass were confirmed to be independent predictors by logistic regression analysis (p < 0.01). In the high-risk thymoma group, 11 patients (21.2%) were categorized as having poor outcomes, and the CT feature pericardial mass was confirmed to be an independent predictor (p < 0.01). In survival analysis, Cox regression showed that CT features of lung invasion, great vessel invasion, lung metastasis and distant organ metastasis were independent predictors for worse survival in the thymic carcinoma group (p < 0.01), while lung invasion and pericardial mass were independent predictors for worse survival in high-risk thymoma group. No CT features were related to poor outcome and worse survival in the low-risk thymoma group. Patients with thymic carcinoma had poorer prognosis and worse survival than those with high-risk or low-risk thymoma. CT can serve as an important tool for predicting the prognosis and survival of patients with TETs. In this cohort, CT features of vessel invasion and pericardial mass were related to poorer outcomes in those with thymic carcinoma and pericardial mass in those with high-risk thymoma. Features including lung invasion, great vessel invasion, lung metastasis and distant organ metastasis indicate worse survival in thymic carcinoma, whereas lung invasion and pericardial mass indicate worse survival in high-risk thymoma.

Project description:In the present study, we aimed to construct a radiomics model using contrast‑enhanced computed tomography (CT) to predict the pathological invasiveness of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 179 consecutive patients (89 females) with histologically confirmed TETs from two hospitals. The 82 low‑ and 97 high‑risk TETs were assigned to training (90 tumors), internal validation (49 tumors) and external validation (40 tumors) cohorts. Radiomics features extracted from preoperative contrast‑enhanced chest CT were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Three prediction models were developed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Their performance and clinical utility were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and the DeLong test, respectively. Eight radiomics features with non‑zero coefficients were used to develop a radiomics score, which significantly differed between low‑ and high‑risk TETs (P<0.001). The subjective finding, infiltration, was independently associated with high‑risk TETs. Prediction models based on infiltration alone, the radiomics signature alone, and both these parameters showed diagnostic accuracies of 72.2% [area under curve (AUC), 0.731; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.627‑0.819; sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 60.4%], 88.9% (AUC, 0.944; 95% CI: 0.874‑0.981; sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 85.4%), and 90.0% (AUC, 0.953; 95% CI: 0.887‑0.987; sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 87.5%), respectively. Decision‑curve analysis showed that the combined model added more net benefit than the single‑parameter models. In conclusion, a radiomics signature based on contrast‑enhanced CT has the potential to differentiate between low‑ and high‑risk TETs. The model incorporating the radiomics signature and subjective finding may facilitate the individualized, preoperative prediction of the pathological invasiveness of TETs.

Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of our study was to differentiate between thymoma and thymic carcinoma using a radiomics analysis based on the computed tomography (CT) image features.MethodsThe CT images of 61 patients with thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT with slice thickness <1 mm were analyzed. Pathological examination of the surgical specimens revealed thymoma in 45 and thymic carcinoma in 16. Tumor volume and the ratio of major axis to minor axis were calculated using a computer-aided diagnostic software. Sixty-one different radiomics features in the segmented CT images were extracted, then filtered and minimized by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select the optimal radiomics features for predicting thymic carcinoma. The association between the quantitative values and a diagnosis of thymic carcinoma were analyzed with logistic regression models. Parameters identified as significant in univariate analysis were included in multiple analyses. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were assessed to evaluate the diagnostic performance.ResultsThymic carcinoma was significantly predominant in men (P=0.001). Optimal radiomics features for predicting thymic carcinoma were as follows: gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-homogeneity, GLCM-energy, compactness, large zone high gray-level emphasis (LZHGE), solidity, size of minor axis, and kurtosis. Multiple logistic regression analysis of these features revealed solidity and GLCM-energy as independent indicators associated with thymic carcinoma [odds ratio, 14.7 and 14.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-139.0 and 3.0-68.7; and P=0.045 and 0.002, respectively]. Area under the curve (AUC) for diagnosing thymic carcinoma was 0.882 (sensitivity, 81.2%; specificity, 91.1%). Multivariate analysis adjusted for sex similarly revealed two features (solidity and GLCM-energy) as independent indicators associated with thymic carcinoma (odds ratio, 14.6 and 23.9; 95% CI: 2.4-89.2 and 1.9-302.8; P=0.004 and 0.014, respectively). Adjusted AUC for diagnosing thymic carcinoma was 0.921 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97): sensitivity, 62.5% and specificity, 100%.ConclusionsTwo texture features (GLCM-energy and solidity) were significant predictors of thymic carcinoma.

Project description:BackgroundWe conduct a study in developing and validating four MRI-based radiomics models to preoperatively predict the risk classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).MethodsForty-one patients (low-risk = 17, intermediate-risk = 13, high-risk = 11) underwent MRI before surgery between September 2013 and March 2019 in this retrospective study. The Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferonni correction and variance threshold was used to select appropriate features, and the Random Forest model (three classification model) was used to select features among the high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk of GISTs. The predictive performance of the models built by the Random Forest was estimated by a 5-fold cross validation (5FCV). Their performance was estimated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, summarized as the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for risk classification were reported. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to assess the discriminative ability of these radiomics models.ResultsThe high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk of GISTs were well classified by radiomics models, the micro-average of ROC curves was 0.85, 0.81, 0.87 and 0.94 for T1WI, T2WI, ADC and combined three MR sequences. And ROC curves achieved excellent AUCs for T1WI (0.85, 0.75 and 0.82), T2WI (0.69, 0.78 and 0.78), ADC (0.85, 0.77 and 0.80) and combined three MR sequences (0.96, 0.92, 0.81) for the diagnosis of high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk of GISTs, respectively. In addition, LDA demonstrated the different risk of GISTs were correctly classified by radiomics analysis (61.0% for T1WI, 70.7% for T2WI, 83.3% for ADC, and 78.9% for the combined three MR sequences).ConclusionsRadiomics models based on a single sequence and combined three MR sequences can be a noninvasive method to evaluate the risk classification of GISTs, which may help the treatment of GISTs patients in the future.