Dataset Information

Individualized Polygenic Risk Score Identifies NASH in the Eastern Asia Region: A Derivation and Validation Study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Strong evidence indicates that multiple genetic and environmental risk factors play a role in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram, incorporating both genetic and clinical factors, for predicting NASH.

Methods

A total of 1,070 Asian individuals with biopsy-confirmed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) from 2 countries (China and South Korea) were recruited. The histological spectrum of NAFLD was classified according to the NASH clinical research network scoring system. The nomogram was developed in the Chinese training set (n = 402), and then, it was validated in both the Chinese internal validation set (n = 136) and the external Korean validation cohort (n = 532), respectively.

Results

Sex, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, serum aspartate aminotransferase levels, and PNPLA3 (rs738409) and HSD17B13 (rs72613567) genetic variants were strongly associated with NASH. Based on their regression coefficients, we developed a nomogram with good discriminatory ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.85) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.794) for identifying NASH. In the 2 validation cohorts, the nomogram showed high area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (internal validation set: 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.88; external validation cohort: 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.80) and good calibration.

Discussion

Our newly developed and externally validated nomogram, incorporating both genetic and clinical risk factors, may be conveniently used to predict NASH. Further validation studies in other ethnic groups are warranted to confirm its diagnostic utility to identify NASH, among patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD.

SUBMITTER: Gao F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7954375 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOne-carbon metabolism, which is crucial in DNA synthesis and genomic stability, is an interrelated network of biochemical reactions involved in several dietary and lifestyle factors. The development of the homocysteine score using these factors may be useful to reflect the status of one-carbon metabolism in large epidemiologic studies without biologic samples to measure homocysteine directly.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to develop an homocysteine score that reflects one-carbon metabolism better than individual dietary or lifestyle factors.MethodsWe divided 2023 participants with measured plasma total homocysteine data in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study into training (n = 1619) and testing (n = 404) subsets. Using multivariable linear regression, we selected lifestyle determinants of plasma homocysteine in the training set and derived the homocysteine score weighted by the ? coefficient for each predictor. The validation of the homocysteine score was assessed using the plasma homocysteine in the independent samples of the training set.ResultsIn the training set, smoking, multivitamin use, and caffeine, alcohol, and dietary and supplemental folate intake were significant independent determinants of plasma homocysteine in multivariable linear regression (P ? 0.01) and were included in the derivation of the homocysteine score. The Pearson correlation of the homocysteine score with plasma homocysteine was 0.30 in the testing subset (P < 0.001). The homocysteine score was positively associated with the plasma homocysteine concentration in the testing subset and in an independent population of women; the mean difference of plasma homocysteine concentration between the extreme quintiles of homocysteine score ranged from 0.83 ?mol/L to 1.52 ?mol/L. Population misclassification either from the lowest quintile of plasma homocysteine into the highest quintile of the homocysteine score or from the highest quintile of plasma homocysteine into the lowest quintile of the homocysteine score was ?12%.ConclusionThese data indicate that the homocysteine score may be used with relatively inexpensive and simple questionnaires to rank an individual's one-carbon metabolism status when homocysteine data are not available.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:To derive and validate a score that correlates with an objective measurement of a child's effort of breathing. DESIGN:Secondary analysis of a previously conducted observational study. SETTING:The pediatric and cardiothoracic ICUs of a quaternary-care children's hospital. PATIENTS:Patients more than 37 weeks gestational age to age 18 years who were undergoing extubation. INTERVENTIONS:Effort of breathing was measured in patients following extubation using esophageal manometry to calculate pressure rate product. Simultaneously, members of a multidisciplinary team (nurse, physician, and respiratory therapist) assessed respiratory function using a previously validated tool. Elements of the tool that were significantly associated with pressure rate product in univariate analysis were identified and included in a multivariate model. An Effort of Breathing score was derived from the results of the model using data from half of the subjects (derivation cohort) and then validated using data from the remaining subjects (validation cohort) by calculating the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for pressure rate product greater than 90th percentile and for the need for reintubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Among 409 subjects, the median age was 5 months, and nearly half were cardiac surgery patients (49.1%). Retractions, stridor, and pulsus paradoxus were included in the Simple Score. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for pressure rate product greater than 90th percentile was 0.8359 (95% CI, 0.7996-0.8722) in the derivation cohort and 0.7930 (0.7524-0.8337) in the validation cohort. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for reintubation was 0.7280 (0.6807-0.7752) when all scores were analyzed individually and was 0.7548 (0.6644-0.8452) if scores from three clinicians from different disciplines were summated. Results were similar regardless of provider discipline or training. CONCLUSIONS:A scoring system was derived and validated, performed acceptably to predict increased effort of breathing or need for advanced respiratory support and may function best when used by a team.