Dataset Information

Stigma and policy preference toward individuals who transition from prescription opioids to heroin.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is a lack of understanding of what contributes to attitudes toward individuals with an opioid addiction and preferences for policies that support them.

Methods

This study aimed to investigate stigmatization of an opioid addiction and support for publicly funded drug treatment. A randomized, between-subjects case vignette study (N = 1998) was conducted with a nation-wide online survey. To assess public perceptions of stigma and support for publicly funded drug treatment, participants rated a hypothetical individual who became addicted to prescription opioids across three conditions: 1) male or female, 2) an individual who was prescribed prescription painkillers or took prescription painkillers from a friend and 3) an individual who transitioned to using heroin or who continued using prescription painkillers.

Results

Our results showed that there were stronger negative attitudes towards a male (p < .01) and toward an individual who took prescription painkillers from a friend (all p's < .05), and both stronger positive and negative attitudes toward an individual who transitioned to heroin from prescription painkillers (all p's < .05). Next, we demonstrated that the probability that someone supports publicly funded drug treatment increases by 3.6 percentage points for each unit increase along a 12-point scale of positive attitudes (p < .0005), 1.3 percentage points for each unit decrease along a 12-point scale of negative attitudes (p < .005), 7.3 percentage points for each unit increase along a 6-point scale of perceived treatment efficacy (p < .0001), 0.1 percentage points for each unit decrease along a 100-point scale that measures the strength of one's belief that addiction is controllable (p < .005) and 0.2 percentage points for each unit decrease along a 100-point scale that measures the strength of one's belief that income is controllable (p < .005). Lastly, when controlling for the effects of stigma, the probability of supporting publicly funded drug treatment decreases by 6.3 percentage points (p < 0.001) when an individual was prescribed prescription painkillers from a doctor. However, path analysis identified a channel through which a doctor's prescription increased support for publicly funded drug treatment by influencing positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and responsibility.

Conclusion

Our findings provide further evidence that information about individuals who become addicted to opioids can influence stigma perceptions and support for publicly funded drug treatment.

SUBMITTER: Goodyear K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7957834 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Stigma and policy preference toward individuals who transition from prescription opioids to heroin.

Goodyear Kimberly K Chavanne David D

Addictive behaviors 20201216

<h4>Background</h4>There is a lack of understanding of what contributes to attitudes toward individuals with an opioid addiction and preferences for policies that support them.<h4>Methods</h4>This study aimed to investigate stigmatization of an opioid addiction and support for publicly funded drug treatment. A randomized, between-subjects case vignette study (N = 1998) was conducted with a nation-wide online survey. To assess public perceptions of stigma and support for publicly funded drug trea ...[more]

PMID: 33360280

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePerceived stigma among patients with alopecia is associated with impaired quality of life; however, the magnitude of laypersons' stigma toward individuals with alopecia is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence and magnitude of laypersons' stigma toward individuals with varying degrees of alopecia and whether stigma increases with increased severity of alopecia.Design, setting, and participantsThis was a cross-sectional study using an internet survey administered to a convenience sample of adult respondents in the US participating on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. Portrait images of 6 individuals without hair loss were created using artificial intelligence and stock images. Each portrait was edited to create 2 additional versions, 1 with scalp hair loss and 1 with complete hair loss, for a total of 18 images. On January 9 to 10, 2020, the survey presented each internet respondent with 1 randomly selected portrait to be used in answering a series of stigma-related questions from 3 domains: stereotypes, social distance, and disease-related myths; the third domain was presented only to respondents who believed that the individual pictured had a medical condition.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcome was the prevalence and magnitude of stigma of laypersons toward individuals with alopecia and the percentage of laypersons who believed the individual pictured had a medical condition as recorded in survey responses.ResultsThe survey was completed by 2015 respondents (99.9% completion rate) with a mean age of 37 (range, 18-78) years; 1014 (50.3%) were men; 1596 (79.2%) were White; and 1397 (69.3%) had a college or postcollege education. Endorsement of every stigma item increased as alopecia severity increased (2.4%-27.6%). Absolute change on the stereotype (0.5-0.6) and social distance scales (0.2-0.5) also increased, indicating more stigma. The percentage of respondents believing the individual pictured had a medical condition increased as alopecia severity increased (33.6%-75.7%; P < .001). Among the subgroup of respondents who were asked to rate their agreement with disease-related myths, the absolute change on the myth scale decreased as alopecia severity increased, indicating decreased stigma (-0.7 to -1.2).Conclusions and relevanceThis cross-sectional survey study found that stigmatizing attitudes of laypersons toward patients with alopecia exist across a multitude of social and professional scenarios. Stigma prevalence and magnitude vary by alopecia severity and possibly by whether alopecia is believed to be a medical condition.

Project description:ImportanceLittle is known about the prevalence and magnitude of stigmatizing attitudes of the general public toward individuals with acne.ObjectiveTo explore the degree of stigma toward individuals with acne and whether these attitudes vary based on characteristics of the individuals with acne or of the survey participants.Design, setting, and participantsIn this cross-sectional internet survey study, 4 stock portraits of adults that varied in sex (male/female) and skin tone (light/dark) were digitally enhanced to have acne (mild/severe). One of these 12 images was randomly presented to survey participants, who subsequently answered questions regarding stigmatizing attitudes with respect to the pictured individual, such as desire for social distance and stereotype endorsement. The survey was administered to a convenience sample of adult respondents in the US who were volunteers on the ResearchMatch platform.Main outcomes and measuresPrevalence and magnitude of stigma toward individuals with acne.ResultsThe survey was completed by 1357 respondents (65.7% completion rate) (mean [SD] age, 42.4 [14.3] years; 918 [67.7%] female, 439 [32.4%] male). Compared to those with no acne, for those with severe acne, participants reported less comfort being friends (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -0.28 [-0.47 to -0.10]; P = .003), hiring (-0.33 [-0.51 to -0.15]; P < .001), having physical contact (-0.26 [-0.45 to -0.08]; P = .006), dating (-0.44 [-0.74 to -0.14]; P = .004), and posting a photograph together on social media (-0.50 [-0.70 to -0.30]; P < .001). Compared to those with no acne, participants were more likely to rate individuals with severe acne as having poor hygiene (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -1.04 [-1.46 to -0.82]; P < .001) and being unattractive (-0.89 [-1.12 to -0.67]; P < .001), unintelligent (-0.42 [-0.63 to -0.22]; P < .001), unlikable (-0.36 [-0.56 to -0.15]; P < .001), immature (-0.52 [-0.74 to -0.30]; P < .001), and untrustworthy (-0.40 [-0.61 to -0.18]; P < .001). There was evidence that the effect size of the association of acne with desire to social distance was greater for individuals with dark skin.Conclusions and relevanceThis survey study demonstrates that stigmatizing attitudes toward patients with acne existed across a variety of social and professional scenarios, with severe acne and acne in darker skin tone being associated with a greater degree of stigma. These findings highlight the need to identify approaches to reduce stigmatizing attitudes in the community and for adequate access to care, which might prevent negative downstream effects related to these stigmatizing attitudes.

Dataset Information

Stigma and policy preference toward individuals who transition from prescription opioids to heroin.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Stigma and policy preference toward individuals who transition from prescription opioids to heroin.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets