Inflammatory Complications of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Cox JT
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7957879 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Intravitreal injection of a therapeutic substance is the most common procedure performed in ophthalmology. It has a low incidence of serious complications but is associated with a small chance of endophthalmitis. Although the rate of endophthalmitis is between 0.019% and 0.09%, the associated visual morbidity is often devastating. Procedural changes have evolved over the years to improve patient comfort and reduce injection-related injury and infection. Despite the availability of published evidence, there remains considerable variations and lack of consensus in practical clinical settings. In addition, emerging literature concerning the use of speculums, the use of prophylactic topical antibiotics, and the setting of injections continues to impact the ophthalmologist's injection practice. This article provides an up to date assessment of various aspects of the procedure such as the setting, ventilation, type of anaesthetic, and control of sterility during the procedure; including discussions on performing bilateral eye same-day injections and the use of antibiotics.
| S-EPMC6098904 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeIntravitreal (IVT) injections of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab are commonly prescribed to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Studies comparing inflammation rates in large populations of patients receiving these agents and the treatment of ocular inflammation post-IVT anti-VEGF injections are scarce. In this study, we compared rates of endophthalmitis claims (sterile and infectious) following IVT anti-VEGF injections to determine the risk factors associated with developing endophthalmitis, and examined the claims for subsequent treatment.Patients and methodsThis retrospective cohort study of USA claims data examined the risk of developing endophthalmitis following IVT injection of aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab in patients with nAMD between 11/18/2011 and 5/31/2013. The primary study outcome was occurrence of endophthalmitis within 30 days of a claim for an IVT anti-VEGF injection. Endophthalmitis rates were calculated separately for aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab, followed by pairwise comparisons of endophthalmitis frequencies among the 3 treatments.ResultsThis analysis included 818,558 injections from 156,594 patients with nAMD. The rates (% [n/N]) of endophthalmitis following aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab IVT injections were 0.100% (136/135,973), 0.056% (268/481,572), and 0.047% (94/201,013), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, aflibercept was associated with a significantly higher risk of endophthalmitis vs ranibizumab (adjusted odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI: 1.68-2.85; P<0.0001). The risk of endophthalmitis was similar for bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Within 14 days after endophthalmitis, 38.6% of cases received injectable antibiotics, 15.3% received injectable steroids, and 30.3% underwent vitrectomy.ConclusionThe rate of endophthalmitis was very low, but higher following IVT injection with aflibercept compared with both bevacizumab and ranibizumab in patients with nAMD.
| S-EPMC6124467 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo report on endophthalmitis occurrence and associated risk factors following the intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents based on a review of published literature.Materials and methodsA Medline search was performed using the terms "bevacizumab" and "ranibizumab". A total of 534 English-language articles of varying design and published from 2006 to November 2013 were analyzed for endophthalmitis occurrence and contributing perioperative factors.ResultsA total of 445,503 injections were counted. There were 103 cases of postinjection endophthalmitis in 176,124 injections (0.058%) with bevacizumab (Avastin) versus 79 cases in 269,379 injections (0.029%) with ranibizumab (Lucentis). This difference was due to a significantly higher occurrence of culture-negative endophthalmitis associated with bevacizumab injections. Culture-positive risk was not statistically different between the two drugs. The reported use of postinjection topical antibiotics increased the risk of culture-positive endophthalmitis. No association was found with the use of povidone iodine, a lid speculum, a mask, or an operating room. Streptococcus spp. were the most prevalent causative organism, accounting for nine of 54 (17%) of all culture-positive cases.ConclusionReported postinjection endophthalmitis occurred significantly more in patients treated with bevacizumab than those treated with ranibizumab. However, culture-positive occurrence was similar. Despite the potential for contamination at the time of drug compounding, bevacizumab does not appear to confer a higher risk of culture-positive endophthalmitis than ranibizumab. This study also suggests antibiotic use may increase endophthalmitis occurrence.
| S-EPMC4427080 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeIntravitreal anti-VEGF injection (IVI) is administered before vitrectomy to assist management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR)-related complications. In the clinical setting, retinal surgeons determine the use of preoperative IVI based on individual criteria. In this study, we investigated factors related to the potential bias of retinal surgeons in using IVI prior to vitrectomy for PDR-related complications, and evaluated the real-world outcomes of surgeon-determined preoperative IVI.MethodsMedical records of 409 eyes of 409 patients who underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy for PDR complications at seven Japanese centers (22 surgeons) were retrospectively reviewed. Ocular factors, demographic and general clinical factors, surgical procedures, and postoperative complications were compared between IVI group (patients who received preoperative IVI; 87 eyes, 21.3%) and non-IVI group (patients who did not receive preoperative IVI; 322 eyes, 78.7%). In addition, baseline HbA1c in IVI group and non-IVI group was compared between eyes with and without postoperative complications.ResultsAt baseline, IVI group was younger (P<0.001), had shorter duration of diabetes treatment (P = 0.045), and higher frequencies of neovascular glaucoma [NVG] (P<0.001) and tractional retinal detachment [TRD] (P<0.001) compared to non-IVI group. Although IVI group had higher frequencies of intraoperative retinal break and tamponade procedure, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications and additional treatments between two groups. Baseline HbA1c levels were also not correlated with postoperative complications of VH, NVG, and RD both in IVI group and non-IVI group. Logistic regression analysis identified age (P<0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.95), presence of NVG (P<0.001, OR 20.2), and presence of TRD (P = 0.0014, OR 2.44) as preoperative factors in favor of IVI.ConclusionsIn this multicenter real-world clinical study, younger age and presence of NVG and TRD were identified as potential biases in using IVI before vitrectomy for PDR complications. Eyes that received preoperative IVI had more intraoperative retinal breaks requiring tamponade than eyes not receiving IVI, but postoperative outcome was not different between the two groups.
| S-EPMC8500446 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether the use of local antibiotics is a beneficial prophylactic treatment for endophthalmitis in patients treated with anti-VEGF agents. We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, and the Cochrane Library over the period January 2007 to December 2016. The search terms used included "Endophthalmitis", "Antibiotic" and "Intravitreal injection". Studies in which the patients were treated exclusively with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF were selected. Eight studies fit the inclusion criteria, which included a total of 276,774 injections; 109,178 (39.45%) were associated with the use of antibiotics and 114,821 (60.55%) were not associated with the use of antibiotics. Our meta-analysis indicated a significant risk for endophthalmitis that was 1.70 times greater with the use of antibiotics than that without antibiotics, with a confidence interval of 1.08 to 2.66 (p?=?0.02). A meta-regression indicated that the location (operating rooms versus outpatient clinics) of injection did not have a significant effect on the incidence of endophthalmitis. The prophylactic use of antibiotics when administering anti-VEGF intravitreal injections may contribute to a greater incidence of endophthalmitis. This finding, in addition to reducing costs, would eliminate a treatment that has been shown to be unnecessary and even harmful to patients.
| S-EPMC5741717 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) now improve or stabilize visual acuity in a number of previously untreatable eye diseases, of which the main are age-related macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion and diabetic macular edema. Most patients require multiple injections over lengthy periods of time and the prevalence of treatable conditions is increasing. Anti-VEGF IVI normally administered by physicians, therefore represent a considerable workload on ophthalmologic clinics and will continue to do so in the near future. Nurse-administered IVI may relieve this workload, but the safety, cost and patient satisfaction of such an extended role for nurses in ophthalmologic clinics has not earlier been investigated. To investigate these outcomes following independent anti-VEGF IVI by trained nurses, a noninferiority randomized controlled trial is being conducted.Patients eligible for anti-VEGF treatment, minimum 304, are recruited and randomized to IVI administration by either trained nurses or physicians. The primary outcome is safety, measured by difference in mean change in visual acuity between the two groups during an observation period of 12 months. Secondary outcomes are incidence of ocular adverse events, cost per patient and patient satisfaction.This study protocol describes the design of the first randomized controlled trial of nurse-administered IVI of anti-VEGF. The study is designed to examine safety, cost and patient satisfaction during 12 months follow-up.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02359149 . Registered February 4, 2015.
| S-EPMC5045663 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate whether intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients with prior stroke or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are associated with increased mortality.MethodsFrom 2005 to 2013, nAMD patients in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database who received IVI of anti-VEGF and had a diagnosis of stroke/AMI prior to their first injections were defined as the IVI group. The mortality of the IVI group during the study period was compared to that of the non-IVI group, which consisted of nAMD patients who had prior stroke/AMI but were never exposed to anti-VEGF. The IVI group and the non-IVI group were 1-4 matched according to propensity score (PS), which was derived from age, sex, date of stroke/AMI and comorbidities. PS-adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality associated with IVI of anti-VEGF. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to the interval between stroke/AMI and IVI (≤6 months, 6 months to 1 year, 1-2 years, >2 years).ResultsThere were 3384 individuals in the IVI group and 13,536 individuals in the non-IVI group. The IVI group had a significantly higher mortality risk (adjusted HR = 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.14-2.62) than the non-IVI group. Subgroup analyses revealed that elevated mortality was significant when anti-VEGF was injected within 1 year after stroke/AMI.ConclusionsWe found an increased mortality risk associated with IVI of anti-VEGF in nAMD patients with prior stroke/AMI compared to the mortality risk of nAMD patients with prior stroke/AMD but without exposure to anti-VEGF.
| S-EPMC8727623 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adherence to French coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19)-related guidelines for intravitreal injection (IVI) practice on the visual outcomes of patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for macular diseases during the first lockdown period.MethodsObservational multicentre study including all patients from 18 centres with an IVI initially planned during the lockdown. Visual acuity (VA, ETDRS) was recorded at 1 and 4 months after lockdown. French COVID 19-related guidelines recommended maintaining IVI practice. We defined three groups of patients: A, adherent to guidelines; NA+, non-adherent with delayed IVIs; and NA-, non-adherent without IVIs performed during the lockdown. Risk factors for non-adherence and visual loss were studied.ResultsA total of 3020 eyes of 3020 patients, aged 77.8 ± 11.6 years, 59.8% women, were included. 59.3% were non-adherent(46.7% NA+, 12.6% NA-). A smaller decrease in VA at 4 months was observed in the A group than the NA+ and NA- group (-0.2 ± 6.7, -0.3 ± 6.9 and -1.5 ± 6.9, respectively [p < 0.001]). Factors associated with non-adherence were in multivariable analysis, older age, hospital practice, low-density population areas, high viral incidence areas, longer intervals between injection and treat and extent protocol. Factors associated with visual loss at 4 months in multivariable analysis were, being in the NA- group, older age, T&E and fixed regimens.ConclusionStrict adherence to guidelines was associated with better visual outcome, although most of our patients did not attend as planned. Identification of patients at risk could help in the future in case of a new pandemic lockdown.
| S-EPMC9350166 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background The study aimed to evaluate the changes in retinal vascular density in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) after long-term anti-VEGF treatment using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A), and to compare these changes with the vascular density in AMD treated for one year and healthy eyes. Methods In our cross-sectional study OCT-A was performed on 60 eyes of 60 patients. Group AMD 20 × consisted of patients receiving long-term (minimum 20 injections) aflibercept therapy (n = 17), and Group AMD one year consisted of patients treated for one year with a treat & extend protocol (n = 25). The vascular density values obtained with OCT-A were compared with an age-matched control group of 18 healthy eyes. We examined the central retinal thickness (CRT), the vascular density of the fovea and parafovea in the superficial and deep retinal plexus, and evaluated the extent of the non-flow area and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) on a 3 × 3 mm macular region. Kruskal–Wallis test was performed for statistical analysis. Results In Group AMD 20x, the vascular density of superficial retinal plexus in the fovea (p = 0.0022) and parafovea (p < 0.0001) was significantly lower compared to Group one year and control group. In the deep retinal plexus, vascular density in the fovea (p = 0.0033) was significantly lower in both AMD groups compared to the control group, with no difference in the parafoveal region (p = 0.0774). The extent of non-flow area (p = 0.0003) and FAZ (p = 0.0008) were significantly larger in both AMD groups compared to the control group. There was a significant difference in CRT between those treated for one year and control eyes (p = 0.0036). Conclusions In our study, we demonstrated that macular vessel density was lower in the foveal area in the superficial retinal plexus in AMD patients after one year and long-term anti-VEGF treatment. These vascular density changes were absent in the parafoveal and whole areas of the deep retinal plexus. Our results indicate that long-term anti-VEGF treatment reduces the vascular density of the superficial retinal plexus to a greater extent compared to the deep retinal plexus. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02700-8.
| S-EPMC9721060 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PURPOSE:To investigate papillary microvascular changes in patients affected by macular edema due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusions (CRVO) after anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) therapy. METHODS:Prospective analysis of papillary and peripapillary vessel density (VD) changes in 18 eyes of 18 hypertensive patients affected by CRVO before and after the loading-phase of intravitreal Ranibizumab (IVR) injections. Data were quantitatively measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) before as well as 1 month and 4 months after injections. The correlation between post-treatment best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and changes in the retinal microvasculature evaluated by OCTA was assessed. Results: 18 eyes of 18 consecutive patients with a known history of arterial hypertension and affected by an acute CRVO episode were enrolled. Central macular thickness (CMT) was significantly reduced after IVR injections (p < 0.001), while mean BCVA improved from 0.70 ± 0.26 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) units at baseline to 0.25 ± 0.18 logMAR units after 4 months (p < 0.001). VD inside disc and peripapillary significantly increased (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively) after treatment. CONCLUSIONS:OCTA showed VD increase in the papillary area in patients affected by CRVO after anti-VEGF therapy. This area could represent a new region of interest to study microvasculature changes concomitant with severe macular edema.
| S-EPMC6832619 | biostudies-literature