Status epilepticus and COVID-19: A systematic review.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the SARS-CoV-2 infection-related coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) a pandemic. During the first and second waves of the pandemic spread, there have been several reports of COVID-19-associated neurological manifestations, including acute seizures and status epilepticus (SE). In this systematic review, we summarized the available data on clinical features, diagnosis, and therapy of COVID-19-related SE.Methods
We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify data on demographics, clinical, neurophysiological, and neuroradiological data of patients with COVID-19-related SE. We used regression models (linear or logistic) with a stepwise forward method to identify features associated with mortality or severity of SE.Results
Thirty-nine articles were included with a total of 47 cases of SE associated with COVID-19. Age, time between the acute respiratory phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection and SE onset, and hospitalization correlated with a higher SE severity as assessed by quantitative validated scales.Conclusions
SE can be a neurological manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although a possible association between SE and COVID-19 has been reported, the exact mechanisms are still not fully understood. Systemic inflammatory syndrome due to cytokine release could play a role in COVID-19-related SE.
SUBMITTER: Dono F
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7968345 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundStatus epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency with potential for substantial mortality and morbidity. Parenteral benzodiazepine is the established first-line treatment but fails to control SE in about one-third of patients. Levetiracetam may be used for SE that is refractory to benzodiazepine therapy.ObjectiveTo examine, by means of a systematic review, the role of IV levetiracetam for the treatment of SE in adults.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were searched, from inception to August 18, 2020.Study selection and data extractionIncluded in this review were prospective randomized controlled trials comparing levetiracetam with another antiepileptic drug, given with or after a benzodiazepine, in adult patients with SE. The primary outcome was cessation of SE. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Characteristics of the included studies were reported using descriptive statistics.Data synthesisFive studies compared IV levetiracetam with valproic acid, phenytoin (or its prodrug fosphenytoin), or both. All 5 studies found no statistically significant differences in efficacy or safety end points. There were numerically more cases of hypotension and respiratory failure with phenytoin, and more cases of psychiatric adverse effects (e.g., post-ictal psychosis) with levetiracetam.ConclusionsAvailable evidence suggests that levetiracetam is as effective as valproic acid or phenytoin for the cessation of SE in adults. Other factors should therefore dictate the choice of antiepileptic drug for patients with SE, such as adverse effect profile, logistics of administration, drug cost, inclusion on hospital formularies, and drug availability.
| S-EPMC8677000 | biostudies-literature
Project description:SARS-CoV-2, a novel zoonotic coronavirus, is currently spreading all over the world, causing a pandemic disease defined coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from asymptomatic or mild infection to rapidly progressive, acute respiratory distress syndrome and death [1].To the best of our knowledge, status epilepticus has never been described as initial presentation of COVID-19. We report a patient affected by COVID-19 whose primary presentation was a focal status epilepticus.
| S-EPMC7172719 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundElectrical status epilepticus during slow-wave sleep (ESESS) which is also known as continuous spike-wave of slow sleep (CSWSS) is type of electroencephalographic (EEG) pattern which is seen in ESESS/CSWSS/epilepsy aphasia spectrum. This EEG pattern can occur alone or with other syndromes. Its etiology is not clear, however, brain malformations, immune disorders, and genetic etiologies are suspected to contribute. We aimed to perform a systematic review of all genetic etiologies which have been reported to associate with ESESS/CSWSS/epilepsy-aphasia spectrum. We further aimed to identify the common underlying pathway which can explain it. To our knowledge, there is no available systematic review of genetic etiologies of ESESS/CSWSS/epilepsy-aphasia spectrum. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane review database were searched, using terms specific to electrical status epilepticus during sleep or continuous spike-wave discharges during slow sleep or epilepsy-aphasia spectrum and of studies of genetic etiologies. These included monogenic mutations and copy number variations (CNVs). For each suspected dosage-sensitive gene, further studies were performed through OMIM and PubMed database.ResultsTwenty-six studies out of the 136 identified studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. I51 cases were identified among those 26 studies. 16 studies reported 11 monogenic mutations: SCN2A (N?=?6), NHE6/SLC9A6 (N?=?1), DRPLA/ ATN1 (N?=?1), Neuroserpin/SRPX2 (N?=?1), OPA3 (N?=?1), KCNQ2 (N?=?2), KCNA2 (N?=?5), GRIN2A (N?=?34), CNKSR2 (N?=?2), SLC6A1 (N?=?2) and KCNB1 (N?=?5). 10 studies reported 89 CNVs including 9 recurrent ones: Xp22.12 deletion encompassing CNKSR2 (N?=?6), 16p13 deletion encompassing GRIN2A (N?=?4), 15q11.2-13.1 duplication (N?=?15), 3q29 duplication (N?=?11), 11p13 duplication (N?=?2), 10q21.3 deletion (N?=?2), 3q25 deletion (N?=?2), 8p23.3 deletion (N?=?2) and 9p24.2 (N?=?2). 68 of the reported genetic etiologies including monogenic mutations and CNVs were detected in patients with ESESS/CSWSS/epilepsy aphasia spectrum solely. The most common underlying pathway was channelopathy (N?=?56).ConclusionsOur review suggests that genetic etiologies have a role to play in the occurrence of ESESS/CSWSS/epilepsy-aphasia spectrum. The common underlying pathway is channelopathy. Therefore we propose more genetic studies to be done for more discoveries which can pave a way for proper drug identification. We also suggest development of common cut-off value for spike-wave index to ensure common language among clinicians and researchers.
| S-EPMC6034250 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7362825 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeNew-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a clinical presentation, neither a specific diagnosis nor a clinical entity. It refers to a patient without active epilepsy or other pre-existing relevant neurological disorder, with a NORSE without a clear acute or active structural, toxic or metabolic cause. This study reviews the currently available evidence about the aetiology of patients presenting with NORSE and NORSE-related conditions.MethodsA systematic search was carried out for clinical trials, observational studies, case series and case reports including patients who presented with NORSE, febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome or the infantile hemiconvulsion-hemiplegia and epilepsy syndrome.ResultsFour hundred and fifty records were initially identified, of which 197 were included in the review. The selected studies were retrospective case-control (n = 11), case series (n = 83) and case reports (n = 103) and overall described 1334 patients both of paediatric and adult age. Aetiology remains unexplained in about half of the cases, representing the so-called 'cryptogenic NORSE'. Amongst adult patients without cryptogenic NORSE, the most often identified cause is autoimmune encephalitis, either non-paraneoplastic or paraneoplastic. Infections are the prevalent aetiology of paediatric non-cryptogenic NORSE. Genetic and congenital disorders can have a causative role in NORSE, and toxic, vascular and degenerative conditions have also been described.ConclusionsFar from being a unitary condition, NORSE is a heterogeneous and clinically challenging presentation. The development and dissemination of protocols and guidelines to standardize diagnostic work-up and guide therapeutic approaches should be implemented. Global cooperation and multicentre research represent priorities to improve the understanding of NORSE.
| S-EPMC9298123 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEvidence-based data on treatment of neonatal status epilepticus (SE) are scarce. We aimed to collect data on the efficacy and safety of ketamine for the treatment of neonatal SE and to assess its possible role in the treatment of neonatal SE.MethodsWe described a novel case and conducted a systematic literature review on neonatal SE treated with ketamine. The search was carried out in Pubmed, Cochrane, Clinical Trial Gov, Scopus and Web of Science.ResultsSeven published cases of neonatal SE treated with ketamine were identified and analyzed together with our novel case. Seizures typically presented during the first 24 h of life (6/8). Seizures were resistant to a mean of five antiseizure medications. Ketamine, a NMDA receptor antagonist, appeared to be safe and effective in all neonates treated. Neurologic sequelae including hypotonia and spasticity were reported for 4/5 of the surviving children (5/8). 3/5 of them were seizure free at 1-17 months of life.DiscussionNeonatal brain is more susceptible to seizures due to a shift towards increased excitation because of a paradoxical excitatory effect of GABA, a greater density of NMDA receptors and higher extracellular concentrations of glutamate. Status epilepticus and neonatal encephalopathy could further enhance these mechanisms, providing a rationale for the use of ketamine in this setting.ConclusionsKetamine in the treatment of neonatal SE showed a promising efficacy and safety profile. However, further in-depth studies and clinical trials on larger populations are needed.
| S-EPMC10275409 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the "severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus 2" (SARS-CoV-2), challenges healthcare systems worldwide and impacts not only COVID-19 patients but also other emergencies. To date, data are scarce on the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacted status epilepticus (SE) and its treatment.ObjectiveTo assess the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, management and outcome of SE patients.Study designThis is a retrospective, multicentre trial, approved by the University of Cologne (21-1443-retro).MethodsAll SE patients from the urban area of Cologne transmitted to all acute neurological departments in Cologne between 03/2019 and 02/2021 were retrospectively analysed and assessed for patient characteristics, SE characteristics, management, and outcome in the first pandemic year compared to the last pre-pandemic year.Results157 pre-pandemic (03/2019-02/2020) and 171 pandemic (from 03/2020 to 02/2021) SE patients were included in the analyses. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infections were rarely detected. Patient characteristics, management, and outcome did not reveal significant groupwise differences. In contrast, regarding prehospital management, a prolonged patient transfer to the hospital and variations in SE aetiologies compared to the last pre-pandemic year were observed with less chronic vascular and more cryptogenic and anoxic SE cases. No infections with SARS-CoV-2 occurred during inpatient stays.ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 infections did not directly affect SE patients, but the transfer of SE patients to emergency departments was delayed. Interestingly, SE aetiology rates shifted, which warrants further exploration. Fears of contracting an in-hospital SARS-CoV-2-infection were unfounded due to consequent containment measures.
| S-EPMC9266085 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundKetamine, as an anesthetic, has been considered for terminating status epilepticus (SE); however, due to the urgency and severity of the condition, there are currently no randomized controlled trials internationally assessing the efficacy of ketamine for treating super-refractory status epilepticus. Similarly, there appears to be a lack of systematic reviews addressing this topic in the literature. Therefore, this systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of ketamine for terminating super-refractory status epilepticus.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Manuscripts unrelated to the research on super-refractory status epilepticus were excluded, as were manuscripts published in non-English languages. The quality assessment and risk of bias were evaluated using the MINORS criteria. Data extraction was limited to qualitative synthesis due to the unsuitability of the data for meta-analysis.ResultsOut of 782 studies retrieved from electronic databases, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 10 studies were retrospective, and 1 study was prospective. Patient data for inclusion were sourced from the case registries of the researchers' respective hospitals. Across all included studies, the administration of ketamine significantly reduced the duration of status epilepticus and demonstrated higher safety compared to patients not receiving ketamine treatment for super-refractory status epilepticus. Additionally, early administration of ketamine correlated with improved treatment outcomes. The risk of bias across all studies was deemed low.ConclusionThis systematic review suggests that ketamine may be a feasible treatment option for super-refractory status epilepticus. However, given the critical nature of super-refractory status epilepticus, clinicians should prioritize its termination over evaluating the efficacy of specific medications, ensuring patient safety remains paramount. If feasible in real-world medical settings, future research should focus on designing randomized controlled trials to observe the specific efficacy and mechanisms of ketamine. Careful validation is necessary before considering ketamine as a first-line treatment for super-refractory status epilepticus.
| S-EPMC11233303 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a medical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality that requires prompt medical intervention. Topiramate (TPM) is an antiepileptic drug effective against a broad spectrum of seizure types, and has been proposed as a possible therapeutic option for super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), the most severe form of GCSE.This review aimed to evaluate the role of TPM in GCSE, including SRSE.MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, LILACS, Google Scholar, and Opengrey.eu were systematically searched. We compared: (1) patients who did and who did not receive TPM as their last drug; (2) patients receiving TPM as the last drug and achieving SE control and patients receiving TPM as the last drug but without termination of SE.The literature search yielded 1164 results, with individual data available for 35 patients (six with SRSE) from four studies. SE was controlled in 68.6% of patients receiving TPM either as the last drug (20) or not (15), and in 14 of the 20 patients receiving TPM as the last drug (70%). Only six patients received TPM for SRSE; in five of them, TPM was administered as the last drug with resolution of SE in four. When comparing patients who did and did not receive TPM as the last drug, no statistically significant difference was found for any of the variables considered; similarly, no difference was found comparing patients receiving TPM as the last drug and achieving SE control with those receiving TPM as the last drug but without termination of SE.The lack of a statistically significant difference is likely to be due to the small sample size. In only a few patients was TPM used for SRSE. There is an unmet need for high-quality studies to evaluate the role of TPM in GCSE.
| S-EPMC5216088 | biostudies-other
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with possible and definitive post-hypoxic status epilepticus (SE) and to describe the SE types in patients with definitive post-hypoxic SE.MethodsPatients with definitive or possible SE resulting from hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest (CA) were prospectively recruited. Intermittent EEG was used for the diagnosis of SE according to clinical practice. Two raters blinded to outcome analyzed EEGs retrospectively for possible and definitive SE patterns and background features (frequency, continuity, reactivity, and voltage). Definitive SE was classified according to semiology (ILAE). Mortality and Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) score were evaluated 1 month after CA.ResultsWe included 64 patients of whom 92% died. Among the survivors, only one patient had a good neurological outcome (CPC 1). No patient survived with a burst suppression pattern, low voltage, or electro-cerebral silence in any EEG. Possible or definitive SE was diagnosed in a median of 47 h (IQR 39-72 h) after CA. EEG criteria for definitive electrographic SE were fulfilled in 39% of patients; in 38% - for electroclinical SE and in 23% - for ictal-interictal continuum (IIC). The outcome did not differ significantly between the three groups. The only patient with good functional outcome belonged to the IIC group. Comatose non-convulsive SE (NCSE) without subtle motor phenomenon occurred in 20% of patients with definitive electrographic SE and outcome was similar to other types of SE.SignificancePossible or definitive SE due to hypoxic brain injury is associated with poor prognosis. The outcome of patients with electrographic SE, electroclinical SE, and IIC did not differ significantly. Outcome was similar in patients with definitive electrographic SE with and without prominent motor features.
| S-EPMC10947449 | biostudies-literature