Dataset Information

Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Gastric Cancer to Identify Those Suitable for Middle Segmental Gastrectomy.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Segmental gastrectomy, a type of function-preserving surgery, is not broadly studied but can improve postoperative function and quality of life among patients with gastric cancer (GC).

Objective

To establish an indication for middle segmental gastrectomy (MSG) as a treatment for middle-body (MB) and high-body (HB) GC.

Design, setting, and participants

This cohort study analyzed patients with GC undergoing surgery between January 2000 and December 2015 in the National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea, a high-volume cancer center with a structured database and accurate long-term follow-up. Inclusion criteria were age 18 to 85 year, histologically proven adenocarcinoma located in the HB or MB, cT1 to cT3 category cancers, curative resection with negative margins performed, and follow-up for at least 3 years. Exclusion criteria were Borrmann type 4 GC, T4 category cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and a history of other cancers. Data analysis was performed from December 2018 to May 2020.

Exposures

Total or subtotal gastrectomy and LN dissection.

Main outcome and measures

The primary outcome was the rate of metastasis at LN stations 2, 4sa, 5, 6, and 11d, which cannot be dissected during MSG.

Results

Among 9952 patients who underwent surgery for GC, 8219 underwent either laparoscopic or open total or subtotal gastrectomy. Seven hundred seventy-three patients (mean [SD] age, 56.21 [12.16] years; 464 men [60.0%]) had GC in the MB or HB of the stomach. Among the 701 patients included in the final analysis after exclusion of the cN2/N3 carcinomas, the mean (SD) age was 56.35 (12.24) years, and 418 (59.6%) were men. The incidence of LN metastasis was 0% at station 5 for cT1-3N0/1M0 cancers, station 4sa for cT1-2N0/1M0 cancers, station 2 for cT1N0/1M0 cancers, station 6 for cT1N1M0 cancers, station 11d for cT1N1M0-cT2N0/1M0 cancers, and station 12a for cT1N0/1M0-T2N1M0 cancers, regardless of size and differentiation. The rates of LN metastasis for cT1N0M0 cancers were 0.3% (1 of 396 LNs) at station 6 and 0.8% (1 of 129 LNs) at station 11d. Tumors 4 cm or smaller were associated with a lower risk of LN metastasis compared with tumors 4.1 cm or larger (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.20-3.67; P = .009), and well-differentiated tumors were associated with lower risk of LN metastasis compared with poorly differentiated tumors (odds ratio, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.45-5.73; P = .002).

Conclusions and relevance

These findings suggest that MSG with dissection of stations 1, 3, 4sb, 4d, 7, 8a, 9, 11p, and 12a could be done for HB and MB cT1N0/1M0 gastric cancers 4 cm or smaller and well-differentiated cT2N0/1M0 cancers.

SUBMITTER: Khalayleh H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7970333 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Simple Summary The signature and prediction of perigastric lymph node metastasis (pLNM) is clinically important, but evidence is still lacking. Here, we aimed to identify an informative signature for the prediction of pLNMs in gastric cancer patients after total gastrectomy, and reassess the current indications for proximal gastrectomy and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG). We found that proximal gastrectomy may be expanded to patients with stage T1–T2 GC and/or tumor diameter < 4 cm in the upper-third stomach, while PPG may be expanded to include T1–T2/N0 and/or tumors < 4 cm in the middle-third stomach. Furthermore, we developed a new predictive factor, the shortest distance from the pylorus ring to the distal edge of the tumor, which showed good predictive performance for pLNMs. Abstract Background: A growing number of studies suggest that the current indications for partial gastrectomy, including proximal gastrectomy and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), may be expanded, but evidence is still lacking. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 300 patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent total gastrectomy. We analyzed the incidence of pLNMs in relation to tumor location, tumor size and T stage. We further identified predictive factors for perigastric lymph node metastasis (pLNM) in stations 1, 2, 3, 4sa, 4sb, 4d, 5, and 6. Results: No patients with upper-third T1–T2 stage GC had pLNMs in stations 4sa, 4sb, 4d, 5, or 6, but 3.8% of patients with stage T3 had 4d pLNM. No patients with upper-third GC < 4 cm in diameter had pLNMs in 2, 4sa, 4d, 5, or 6, and 2.3% of patients had pLNMs in 4sb. For middle-third GCs, 2.9% of patients with T1 stage had pLNMs in 4sa and 5, but no patients with T2 stage or tumors < 4 cm had pLNMs in 2, 4sa, or 5. The shortest distance from pylorus ring to distal edge of tumor (sDPD) was a new predictive factor for pLNMs in 2, 4d, 5, and 6. Conclusions: Proximal gastrectomy may be expanded to patients with stage T1–T2 GC and/or tumor diameter < 4 cm in the upper-third stomach, whereas PPG may be expanded to include T1–T2/N0 and/or tumors < 4 cm in the middle-third stomach. A new predictive factor, sDPD, showed good predictive performance for pLNMs, especially in stations 4d, 5, and 6.