Dataset Information

Respiration Dependency of Caval Blood Flow in Patients with Fontan Circulation: Quantification Using 5D Flow MRI.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To measure respiration-dependent blood flow in the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) of patients with Fontan circulation by using free-running, fully self-gated five-dimensional (5D) flow MRI.

Materials and methods

From July to November 2018, 10 volunteers (six female volunteers, mean age, 25.1 years ± 4.4 [standard deviation]) and six patients with Fontan circulation (two female patients, mean age, 19.7 years ± 7.5) with a TCPC were examined by using a cardiac- and respiration-resolved three-directional and three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI sequence (hereafter, 5D flow MRI). This prospective study was conducted with approval of the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their representative. 5D flow data were acquired during free breathing. Data were reconstructed into 15-20 heart phases and four respiratory phases: end-expiration, inspiration, end-inspiration, and expiration. Respiration-dependent stroke volumes (SVs) and particle traces were analyzed from the caval circulation of volunteers and patients with Fontan circulation. Statistical analysis was performed by using parametric tests and scatterplots.

Results

The respiration dependency of caval blood flow was evaluated in all participants and was significantly elevated in patients with Fontan circulation as compared with volunteers. In patients, SV in the inferior vena cava (IVC) showed variations of 120% between inspiration and expiration (P = .002). The flow distribution in the IVC and superior vena cava among the four respiratory phases was differentiated by 20% (range, 9%-30%) and 4% (range, 0%-13%), respectively.

Conclusion

Hemodynamic parameters (volume flow and blood flow distribution) throughout the cardiac and respiratory cycle can be measured using a single scan, potentially providing further insights into the Fontan circulation.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.

SUBMITTER: Bastkowski R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7977808 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDual-venc 4D flow MRI, recently introduced for the assessment of intracranial hemodynamics, may provide a promising complementary approach to well-established tools such as transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and overcome some of their disadvantages. However, data comparing intracranial flow measures from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD are lacking.PurposeTo compare cerebral blood flow velocity measures derived from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD.Study typeProspective cohort.SubjectsA total of 25 healthy participants (56 ± 4 years old, 44% female).Field strength/sequenceA 3 T/dual-venc 4D flow MRI using a time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast sequence with three-dimensional velocity encoding.AssessmentPeak velocity measurements in bilateral middle cerebral arteries (MCA) were quantified from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD. The MRI data were quantified by two independent observers (S.M and Y.M.) and TCD was performed by a trained technician (A.L.M.). We assessed the agreement between 4D flow MRI and TCD measures, and the interobserver agreement of 4D flow MRI measurements.Statistical testsPeak velocity from MRI and TCD was compared using Bland-Altman analysis and coefficient of variance. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess MRI interobserver agreement. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThere was excellent interobserver agreement in dual-venc 4D flow MRI-based measurements of peak velocity in bilateral MCA (ICC = 0.97 and 0.96 for the left and right MCA, respectively). Dual-venc 4D flow MRI significantly underestimated peak velocity in the left and right MCA compared to TCD (bias = 0.13 [0.59, -0.33] m/sec and 0.15 [0.47, -0.17] m/sec, respectively). The coefficient of variance between dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD measurements was 26% for the left MCA and 22% for the right MCA.Data conclusionThere was excellent interobserver agreement for the assessment of MCA peak velocity using dual-venc 4D flow MRI, and ≤20% under-estimation compared with TCD.Evidence level3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Project description:BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with hemodynamic changes in the pulmonary vasculature. However, cardiac effects are not fully understood and vary by phenotype of chronic lower respiratory disease.PurposeTo use four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI for comprehensive assessment of the right-sided cardiovascular system, assess its interrater and intraobserver reproducibility, and examine associations with venous return to the right heart in individuals with chronic COPD and emphysema.Materials and MethodsThe Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis COPD substudy prospectively recruited participants who smoked and who had COPD and nested control participants from population-based samples. Electrocardiography and respiratory gated 4D flow 1.5-T MRI was performed at three sites with full volumetric coverage of the thoracic vessels in 2014-2017 with postbronchodilator spirometry and inspiratory chest CT to quantify percent emphysema. Net flow, peak velocity, retrograde flow, and retrograde fraction were measured on 14 analysis planes. Interrater reproducibility was assessed by two independent observers, and the principle of conservation of mass was employed to evaluate the internal consistency of flow measures. Partial correlation coefficients were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, height, weight, and smoking status.ResultsAmong 70 participants (29 participants with COPD [mean age, 73.5 years ± 8.1 {standard deviation}; 20 men] and 41 control participants [mean age, 71.0 years ± 6.1; 22 men]), the interrater reproducibility of the 4D flow MRI measures was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.73-0.98), as was the internal consistency. There were no statistically significant differences in venous flow parameters according to COPD severity (P > .05). Greater percent emphysema at CT was associated with greater regurgitant flow in the superior and inferior caval veins and tricuspid valve (adjusted r = 0.28-0.55; all P < .01), particularly in the superior vena cava.ConclusionFour-dimensional flow MRI had good-to-excellent observer variability and flow consistency. Percent emphysema at CT was associated with statistically significant differences in retrograde flow, greatest in the superior vena cava.© RSNA, 2019Online supplemental material is available for this article.See also the editorial by Choe in this issue.

Project description:PurposeTo compare the accuracy of semiautomated flow tracking with that of semiautomated valve tracking in the quantification of mitral valve (MV) regurgitation from clinical four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI data obtained in patients with mild, moderate, or severe MV regurgitation.Materials and methodsThe 4D flow MRI data were retrospectively collected from 30 patients (21 men; mean age, 61 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) who underwent 4D flow MRI from 2006 to 2016. Ten patients had mild MV regurgitation, nine had moderate MV regurgitation, and 11 had severe MV regurgitation, as diagnosed by using semiquantitative echocardiography. The regurgitant volume (Rvol) across the MV was obtained using three methods: indirect quantification of Rvol (RvolINDIRECT), semiautomated quantification of Rvol using valve tracking (RvolVALVE), and semiautomated quantification of Rvol using flow tracking (RvolFLOW). A second observer repeated the measurements. Aortic valve flow was quantified as well to test for intervalve consistency. The Wilcoxon signed rank test, orthogonal regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and coefficients of variation were used to assess agreement among measurements and between observers.ResultsRvolFLOW was higher (median, 24.8 mL; interquartile range [IQR], 14.3-45.7 mL) than RvolVALVE (median, 9.9 mL; IQR, 6.0-16.9 mL; P < .001). Both RvolFLOW and RvolVALVE differed significantly from RvolINDIRECT (median, 19.1 mL; IQR, 4.1-47.5 mL; P = .03). RvolFLOW agreed more with RvolINDIRECT (ŷ = 0.78x + 12, r = 0.88) than with RvolVALVE (ŷ = 0.16x + 8.1, r = 0.53). Bland-Altman analysis revealed underestimation of RvolVALVE in severe MV regurgitation. Interobserver agreement was excellent for RvolFLOW (r = 0.95, coefficient of variation = 27%) and moderate for RvolVALVE (r = 0.72, coefficient of variation = 57%). Orthogonal regression demonstrated better intervalve consistency for flow tracking (ŷ = 1.2x - 13.4, r = 0.82) than for valve tracking (ŷ = 2.7x - 92.4, r = 0.67).ConclusionFlow tracking enables more accurate 4D flow MRI-derived MV regurgitation quantification than valve tracking in terms of agreement with indirect quantification and intervalve consistency, particularly in severe MV regurgitation.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020.