Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to April 2020. The active drugs included three JAK inhibitors and eight bDMARDs while the control drugs included placebo or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Outcomes include American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and discontinuations for adverse events (AEs). We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) using network meta-analysis with random effects.

Results

Eighty-eight RCTs with 31,566 patients were included. All JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs were more effective than placebo in ACR20 (ORs ranging between 3.05 and 5.61), DAS28 (WMDs ranging between -1.91 and -0.80) and HAQ-DI (WMDs ranging between -0.34 and -0.21). Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib showed relatively good efficacy in these three outcomes according to their relative ranking. Notably, tocilizumab was more effective than other active drugs in DAS28 (WMDs ranging between -1.11 and -0.49). Compared with the lower recommended doses, increasing the doses of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib 4 mg versus 2 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg versus 5 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg versus 15 mg) cannot provide significant additional benefits. In terms of discontinuations for AEs, all active drugs showed no significant difference compared with placebo except certolizumab pegol [OR 1.65, 95% credible interval (CrI) 1.06-2.61] and rituximab (3.17, 1.11-10.80).

Conclusions

Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib may have relatively good efficacy in patients with RA after treatment failure with csDMARDs. RA patients taking a JAK inhibitor may have a preference for a lower recommended dose.

SUBMITTER: Weng C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7989112 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10338257 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4112169 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3933074 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4414700 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8363846 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4276289 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7282084 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6112083 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5901029 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9821556 | biostudies-literature