Dataset Information

Protocol for a reproducible experimental survey on biomedical sentence similarity.

ABSTRACT: Measuring semantic similarity between sentences is a significant task in the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP), Information Retrieval (IR), and biomedical text mining. For this reason, the proposal of sentence similarity methods for the biomedical domain has attracted a lot of attention in recent years. However, most sentence similarity methods and experimental results reported in the biomedical domain cannot be reproduced for multiple reasons as follows: the copying of previous results without confirmation, the lack of source code and data to replicate both methods and experiments, and the lack of a detailed definition of the experimental setup, among others. As a consequence of this reproducibility gap, the state of the problem can be neither elucidated nor new lines of research be soundly set. On the other hand, there are other significant gaps in the literature on biomedical sentence similarity as follows: (1) the evaluation of several unexplored sentence similarity methods which deserve to be studied; (2) the evaluation of an unexplored benchmark on biomedical sentence similarity, called Corpus-Transcriptional-Regulation (CTR); (3) a study on the impact of the pre-processing stage and Named Entity Recognition (NER) tools on the performance of the sentence similarity methods; and finally, (4) the lack of software and data resources for the reproducibility of methods and experiments in this line of research. Identified these open problems, this registered report introduces a detailed experimental setup, together with a categorization of the literature, to develop the largest, updated, and for the first time, reproducible experimental survey on biomedical sentence similarity. Our aforementioned experimental survey will be based on our own software replication and the evaluation of all methods being studied on the same software platform, which will be specially developed for this work, and it will become the first publicly available software library for biomedical sentence similarity. Finally, we will provide a very detailed reproducibility protocol and dataset as supplementary material to allow the exact replication of all our experiments and results.

SUBMITTER: Lara-Clares A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7990182 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:This registered report introduces the largest, and for the first time, reproducible experimental survey on biomedical sentence similarity with the following aims: (1) to elucidate the state of the art of the problem; (2) to solve some reproducibility problems preventing the evaluation of most current methods; (3) to evaluate several unexplored sentence similarity methods; (4) to evaluate for the first time an unexplored benchmark, called Corpus-Transcriptional-Regulation (CTR); (5) to carry out a study on the impact of the pre-processing stages and Named Entity Recognition (NER) tools on the performance of the sentence similarity methods; and finally, (6) to bridge the lack of software and data reproducibility resources for methods and experiments in this line of research. Our reproducible experimental survey is based on a single software platform, which is provided with a detailed reproducibility protocol and dataset as supplementary material to allow the exact replication of all our experiments and results. In addition, we introduce a new aggregated string-based sentence similarity method, called LiBlock, together with eight variants of current ontology-based methods, and a new pre-trained word embedding model trained on the full-text articles in the PMC-BioC corpus. Our experiments show that our novel string-based measure establishes the new state of the art in sentence similarity analysis in the biomedical domain and significantly outperforms all the methods evaluated herein, with the only exception of one ontology-based method. Likewise, our experiments confirm that the pre-processing stages, and the choice of the NER tool for ontology-based methods, have a very significant impact on the performance of the sentence similarity methods. We also detail some drawbacks and limitations of current methods, and highlight the need to refine the current benchmarks. Finally, a notable finding is that our new string-based method significantly outperforms all state-of-the-art Machine Learning (ML) models evaluated herein.

Project description:BackgroundNeural network based embedding models are receiving significant attention in the field of natural language processing due to their capability to effectively capture semantic information representing words, sentences or even larger text elements in low-dimensional vector space. While current state-of-the-art models for assessing the semantic similarity of textual statements from biomedical publications depend on the availability of laboriously curated ontologies, unsupervised neural embedding models only require large text corpora as input and do not need manual curation. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of current state-of-the-art neural sentence embedding models for semantic similarity estimation of sentences from biomedical literature. We trained different neural embedding models on 1.7 million articles from the PubMed Open Access dataset, and evaluated them based on a biomedical benchmark set containing 100 sentence pairs annotated by human experts and a smaller contradiction subset derived from the original benchmark set.ResultsExperimental results showed that, with a Pearson correlation of 0.819, our best unsupervised model based on the Paragraph Vector Distributed Memory algorithm outperforms previous state-of-the-art results achieved on the BIOSSES biomedical benchmark set. Moreover, our proposed supervised model that combines different string-based similarity metrics with a neural embedding model surpasses previous ontology-dependent supervised state-of-the-art approaches in terms of Pearson's r (r = 0.871) on the biomedical benchmark set. In contrast to the promising results for the original benchmark, we found our best models' performance on the smaller contradiction subset to be poor.ConclusionsIn this study, we have highlighted the value of neural network-based models for semantic similarity estimation in the biomedical domain by showing that they can keep up with and even surpass previous state-of-the-art approaches for semantic similarity estimation that depend on the availability of laboriously curated ontologies, when evaluated on a biomedical benchmark set. Capturing contradictions and negations in biomedical sentences, however, emerged as an essential area for further work.

Project description:BackgroundOntology-based semantic similarity measures based on SNOMED-CT, MeSH, and Gene Ontology are being extensively used in many applications in biomedical text mining and genomics respectively, which has encouraged the development of semantic measures libraries based on the aforementioned ontologies. However, current state-of-the-art semantic measures libraries have some performance and scalability drawbacks derived from their ontology representations based on relational databases, or naive in-memory graph representations. Likewise, a recent reproducible survey on word similarity shows that one hybrid IC-based measure which integrates a shortest-path computation sets the state of the art in the family of ontology-based semantic measures. However, the lack of an efficient shortest-path algorithm for their real-time computation prevents both their practical use in any application and the use of any other path-based semantic similarity measure.ResultsTo bridge the two aforementioned gaps, this work introduces for the first time an updated version of the HESML Java software library especially designed for the biomedical domain, which implements the most efficient and scalable ontology representation reported in the literature, together with a new method for the approximation of the Dijkstra's algorithm for taxonomies, called Ancestors-based Shortest-Path Length (AncSPL), which allows the real-time computation of any path-based semantic similarity measure.ConclusionsWe introduce a set of reproducible benchmarks showing that HESML outperforms by several orders of magnitude the current state-of-the-art libraries in the three aforementioned biomedical ontologies, as well as the real-time performance and approximation quality of the new AncSPL shortest-path algorithm. Likewise, we show that AncSPL linearly scales regarding the dimension of the common ancestor subgraph regardless of the ontology size. Path-based measures based on the new AncSPL algorithm are up to six orders of magnitude faster than their exact implementation in large ontologies like SNOMED-CT and GO. Finally, we provide a detailed reproducibility protocol and dataset as supplementary material to allow the exact replication of all our experiments and results.

Dataset Information

Protocol for a reproducible experimental survey on biomedical sentence similarity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets