Dataset Information

Reduced mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with colchicine: Results from a retrospective, observational study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Effective treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are urgently needed. We hypothesized that colchicine, by counteracting proinflammatory pathways implicated in the uncontrolled inflammatory response of COVID-19 patients, reduces pulmonary complications, and improves survival.

Methods

This retrospective study included 71 consecutive COVID-19 patients (hospitalized with pneumonia on CT scan or outpatients) who received colchicine and compared with 70 control patients who did not receive colchicine in two serial time periods at the same institution. We used inverse probability of treatment propensity-score weighting to examine differences in mortality, clinical improvement (using a 7-point ordinary scale), and inflammatory markers between the two groups.

Results

Amongst the 141 COVID-19 patients (118 [83.7%] hospitalized), 70 (50%) received colchicine. The 21-day crude cumulative mortality was 7.5% in the colchicine group and 28.5% in the control group (P = 0.006; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.24 [95%CI: 0.09 to 0.67]); 21-day clinical improvement occurred in 40.0% of the patients on colchicine and in 26.6% of control patients (adjusted relative improvement rate: 1.80 [95%CI: 1.00 to 3.22]). The strong association between the use of colchicine and reduced mortality was further supported by the diverging linear trends of percent daily change in lymphocyte count (P = 0.018), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.003), and in C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.009). Colchicine was stopped because of transient side effects (diarrhea or skin rashes) in 7% of patients.

Conclusion

In this retrospective cohort study colchicine was associated with reduced mortality and accelerated recovery in COVID-19 patients. This support the rationale for current larger randomized controlled trials testing the safety/efficacy profile of colchicine in COVID-19 patients.

SUBMITTER: Manenti L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7990208 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe advent of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused millions of deaths worldwide. As of December 2021, there is inadequate data on the outcome of hospitalized patients suffering from COVID-19 in Africa. This study aimed at identifying factors associated with hospital mortality in patients who suffered from COVID-19 at Gulu Regional Referral Hospital in Northern Uganda from March 2020 to October 2021.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective cohort study in patients hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 at Gulu Regional Referral Hospital in Northern Uganda. Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, co-morbidities, duration of hospital stay, and treatments were analyzed, and factors associated with the odds of mortality were determined.ResultsOf the 664 patients treated, 661 (99.5%) were unvaccinated, 632 (95.2%) recovered and 32 (4.8%) died. Mortality was highest in diabetics 11 (34.4%), cardiovascular diseases 12 (37.5%), hypertensives 10 (31.3%), females 18 (56.3%), ≥50-year-olds 19 (59.4%), no formal education 14 (43.8%), peasant farmers 12 (37.5%) and those who presented with difficulty in breathing/shortness of breath and chest pain 32 (100.0%), oxygen saturation (SpO2) at admission <80 4 (12.5%), general body aches and pains 31 (96.9%), tiredness 30 (93.8%) and loss of speech and movements 11 (34.4%). The independent factors associated with mortality among the COVID-19 patients were females AOR = 0.220, 95%CI: 0.059-0.827; p = 0.030; Diabetes mellitus AOR = 9.014, 95%CI: 1.726-47.067; p = 0.010; Ages of 50 years and above AOR = 2.725, 95%CI: 1.187-6.258; p = 0.018; tiredness AOR = 0.059, 95%CI: 0.009-0.371; p < 0.001; general body aches and pains AOR = 0.066, 95%CI: 0.007-0.605; p = 0.020; loss of speech and movement AOR = 0.134, 95%CI: 0.270-0.660; p = 0.010 and other co-morbidities AOR = 6.860, 95%CI: 1.309-35.957; p = 0.020.ConclusionThe overall Gulu Regional Hospital mortality was 32/664 (4.8%). Older age, people with diabetics, females, other comorbidities, severe forms of the disease, and those admitted to HDU were significant risk factors associated with hospital mortality. More efforts should be made to provide "additional social protection" to the most vulnerable population to avoid preventable morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 in Northern Uganda.

Project description:BackgroundAfter more than 2 years of the pandemic, effective treatment for COVID-19 is still under research. In recent months, publications hypothesized amantadine's potential beneficial effect on SARS-CoV-2 infection.ObjectiveTo compare the groups of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients who were administered amantadine chronically and those who did not take this medication in the context of the incidence and severity of COVID-19 infection.MethodsAn observational, retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted among consecutive patients with idiopathic PD. The structured questionnaires were completed during the patient's follow-up visits at the Outpatient Clinic or during hospitalization. The questionnaire included the following informations: patient's age, duration of PD, Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) stage, comorbidities, medications, COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) swab test for SARS-CoV-2 with specified symptoms and their severity (home or hospital treatment). The vaccination status was verified as well.ResultsFive hundred fifty-two (n = 552) patients participated in the study - 329 men (60%). The mean H-Y stage was 2.44 (range: 1-4) and the mean duration of PD was 9.6 years (range: 1-34). One hundred four subjects (19%) had confirmed COVID-19 infection. Subjects over 50 years of age had a significantly lower incidence of COVID-19 (17% vs 38%, p = 0.0001) with difference also in mean H-Y stage (2.27 vs 2.49; p = 0.011) and disease duration (8.4 vs 9.9 years, p = 0.007). There were no differences between patients with and without co-morbidities. In the whole analyzed group 219 (40%) subjects were treated with amantadine. Comparing COVID-19 positive and negative patients, amantadine was used by 48/104 (46%) and 171/448 (38%) respectively. 22% of patients on amantadine vs. 17% of patients without amantadine developed COVID-19. These differences were not significant. There were no differences in morbidity and severity of COVID-19 between amantadine users and non-users as well.ConclusionsCOVID-19 was less common in older (>50) with longer duration and more advanced patients. Amantadine did not affect the risk of developing COVID-19 or the severity of infection.

Project description:ObjectivePoor outcomes have been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); thus, it is mandatory to explore novel therapeutic approaches for this population.Research design and methodsIn a multicenter, case-control, retrospective, observational study, sitagliptin, an oral and highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, was added to standard of care (e.g., insulin administration) at the time of hospitalization in patients with type 2 diabetes who were hospitalized with COVID-19. Every center also recruited at a 1:1 ratio untreated control subjects matched for age and sex. All patients had pneumonia and exhibited oxygen saturation <95% when breathing ambient air or when receiving oxygen support. The primary end points were discharge from the hospital/death and improvement of clinical outcomes, defined as an increase in at least two points on a seven-category modified ordinal scale. Data were collected retrospectively from patients receiving sitagliptin from 1 March through 30 April 2020.ResultsOf the 338 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes and COVID-19 admitted in Northern Italy hospitals included in this study, 169 were on sitagliptin, while 169 were on standard of care. Treatment with sitagliptin at the time of hospitalization was associated with reduced mortality (18% vs. 37% of deceased patients; hazard ratio 0.44 [95% CI 0.29-0.66]; P = 0.0001), with an improvement in clinical outcomes (60% vs. 38% of improved patients; P = 0.0001) and with a greater number of hospital discharges (120 vs. 89 of discharged patients; P = 0.0008) compared with patients receiving standard of care, respectively.ConclusionsIn this multicenter, case-control, retrospective, observational study of patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to the hospital for COVID-19, sitagliptin treatment at the time of hospitalization was associated with reduced mortality and improved clinical outcomes as compared with standard-of-care treatment. The effects of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and COVID-19 should be confirmed in an ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled trial.