Dataset Information

OncoGEMINI: software for investigating tumor variants from multiple biopsies with integrated cancer annotations.

ABSTRACT:

Background

DNA sequencing has unveiled extensive tumor heterogeneity in several different cancer types, with many exhibiting diverse subclonal populations. Identifying and tracing mutations throughout the expansion and progression of a tumor represents a significant challenge. Furthermore, prioritizing the subset of such mutations most likely to contribute to tumor evolution or that could serve as potential therapeutic targets represents an ongoing problem.

Results

Here, we describe OncoGEMINI, a new tool designed for exploring the complex patterns and trajectory of somatic and inherited variation observed in heterogeneous tumors biopsied over the course of treatment. This is accomplished by creating a searchable database of variants that includes tumor sampling time points and allows for filtering methods that reflect specific changes in variant allele frequencies over time. Additionally, by incorporating existing annotations and resources that facilitate the interpretation of cancer mutations (e.g., CIViC, DGIdb), OncoGEMINI enables rapid searches for, and potential identification of, mutations that may be driving subclonal evolution.

Conclusions

By combining relevant genomic annotations alongside specific filtering tools, OncoGEMINI provides powerful and customizable approaches that enable the quick identification of individual tumor variants that meet specified criteria. It can be applied to a wide range of tumor-derived sequence data, but is especially designed for studies with multiple samples, including longitudinal datasets. It is available under an MIT license at github.com/fakedrtom/oncogemini .

SUBMITTER: Nicholas TJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7995589 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe number of corpora, collections of structured texts, has been increasing, as a result of the growing interest in the application of natural language processing methods to biological texts. Many named entity recognition (NER) systems have been developed based on these corpora. However, in the biomedical community, there is yet no general consensus regarding named entity annotation; thus, the resources are largely incompatible, and it is difficult to compare the performance of systems developed on resources that were divergently annotated. On the other hand, from a practical application perspective, it is desirable to utilize as many existing annotated resources as possible, because annotation is costly. Thus, it becomes a task of interest to integrate the heterogeneous annotations in these resources.ResultsWe explore the potential sources of incompatibility among gene and protein annotations that were made for three common corpora: GENIA, GENETAG and AIMed. To show the inconsistency in the corpora annotations, we first tackle the incompatibility problem caused by corpus integration, and we quantitatively measure the effect of this incompatibility on protein mention recognition. We find that the F-score performance declines tremendously when training with integrated data, instead of training with pure data; in some cases, the performance drops nearly 12%. This degradation may be caused by the newly added heterogeneous annotations, and cannot be fixed without an understanding of the heterogeneities that exist among the corpora. Motivated by the result of this preliminary experiment, we further qualitatively analyze a number of possible sources for these differences, and investigate the factors that would explain the inconsistencies, by performing a series of well-designed experiments. Our analyses indicate that incompatibilities in the gene/protein annotations exist mainly in the following four areas: the boundary annotation conventions, the scope of the entities of interest, the distribution of annotated entities, and the ratio of overlap between annotated entities. We further suggest that almost all of the incompatibilities can be prevented by properly considering the four aspects aforementioned.ConclusionOur analysis covers the key similarities and dissimilarities that exist among the diverse gene/protein corpora. This paper serves to improve our understanding of the differences in the three studied corpora, which can then lead to a better understanding of the performance of protein recognizers that are based on the corpora.

Project description:Melanomas are highly immunogenic tumors that have been shown to activate the immune response. Nonetheless, a significant portion of melanoma cases are either unresponsive to immunotherapy or relapsed due to acquired resistance. During melanomagenesis, melanoma and immune cells undergo immunomodulatory mechanisms that aid in immune resistance and evasion. The crosstalk within melanoma microenvironment is facilitated through the secretion of soluble factors, growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines. In addition, the release and uptake of secretory vesicles known as extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a key role in shaping the tumor microenvironment (TME). Melanoma-derived EVs have been implicated in immune suppression and escape, promoting tumor progression. In the context of cancer patients, EVs are usually isolated from biofluids such as serum, urine, and saliva. Nonetheless, this approach neglects the fact that biofluid-derived EVs reflect not only the tumor, but also include contributions from different organs and cell types. For that, isolating EVs from tissue samples allows for studying different cell populations resident at the tumor site, such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their secreted EVs, which play a central anti-tumor role. Herein, we outline the first instance of a method for EV isolation from frozen tissue samples at high purity and sensitivity that can be easily reproduced without the need for complicated isolation methods. Our method of processing the tissue not only circumvents the need for hard-to-acquire freshly isolated tissue samples, but also preserves EV surface proteins which allows for multiplex surface markers profiling. Tissue-derived EVs provide insight into the physiological role of EVs enrichment at tumor sites, which can be overlooked when studying circulating EVs coming from different sources. Tissue-derived EVs could be further characterized in terms of their genomics and proteomics to identify possible mechanisms for regulating the TME. Additionally, identified markers could be correlated to overall patient survival and disease progression for prognostic purposes. Graphical Abstract

Project description:In order that biological meaning may be derived and testable hypotheses may be built from proteomics experiments, assignments of proteins identified by mass spectrometry or other techniques must be supplemented with additional notation, such as information on known protein functions, protein-protein interactions, or biological pathway associations. Collecting, organizing, and interpreting this data often requires the input of experts in the biological field of study, in addition to the time-consuming search for and compilation of information from online protein databases. Furthermore, visualizing this bulk of information can be challenging due to the limited availability of easy-to-use and freely available tools for this process. In response to these constraints, we have undertaken the design of software to automate annotation and visualization of proteomics data in order to accelerate the pace of research. Here we present the Software Tool for Researching Annotations of Proteins (STRAP), a user-friendly, open-source C# application. STRAP automatically obtains gene ontology (GO) terms associated with proteins in a proteomics results ID list using the freely accessible UniProtKB and EBI GOA databases. Summarized in an easy-to-navigate tabular format, STRAP results include meta-information on the protein in addition to complementary GO terminology. Additionally, this information can be edited by the user so that in-house expertise on particular proteins may be integrated into the larger data set. STRAP provides a sortable tabular view for all terms, as well as graphical representations of GO-term association data in pie charts (biological process, cellular component, and molecular function) and bar charts (cross comparison of sample sets) to aid in the interpretation of large data sets and differential analyses experiments. Furthermore, proteins of interest may be exported as a unique FASTA-formatted file to allow for customizable re-searching of mass spectrometry data, and gene names corresponding to the proteins in the lists may be encoded in the Gaggle microformat for further characterization, including pathway analysis. STRAP, a tutorial, and the C# source code are freely available from http://cpctools.sourceforge.net.

Project description:BackgroundIncreasingly high amounts of heterogeneous and valuable controlled biomolecular annotations are available, but far from exhaustive and scattered in many databases. Several annotation integration and prediction approaches have been proposed, but these issues are still unsolved. We previously created a Genomic and Proteomic Knowledge Base (GPKB) that efficiently integrates many distributed biomolecular annotation and interaction data of several organisms, including 32,956,102 gene annotations, 273,522,470 protein annotations and 277,095 protein-protein interactions (PPIs).ResultsBy comprehensively leveraging transitive relationships defined by the numerous association data integrated in GPKB, we developed a software procedure that effectively detects and supplement consistent biomolecular annotations not present in the integrated sources. According to some defined logic rules, it does so only when the semantic type of data and of their relationships, as well as the cardinality of the relationships, allow identifying molecular biology compliant annotations. Thanks to controlled consistency and quality enforced on data integrated in GPKB, and to the procedures used to avoid error propagation during their automatic processing, we could reliably identify many annotations, which we integrated in GPKB. They comprise 3,144 gene to pathway and 21,942 gene to biological function annotations of many organisms, and 1,027 candidate associations between 317 genetic disorders and 782 human PPIs. Overall estimated recall and precision of our approach were 90.56 % and 96.61 %, respectively. Co-functional evaluation of genes with known function showed high functional similarity between genes with new detected and known annotation to the same pathway; considering also the new detected gene functional annotations enhanced such functional similarity, which resembled the one existing between genes known to be annotated to the same pathway. Strong evidence was also found in the literature for the candidate associations detected between Cystic fibrosis disorder and the PPIs between the CFTR_HUMAN, DERL1_HUMAN, RNF5_HUMAN, AHSA1_HUMAN and GOPC_HUMAN proteins, and between the CHIP_HUMAN and HSP7C_HUMAN proteins.ConclusionsAlthough identified gene annotations and PPI-genetic disorder candidate associations require biological validation, our approach intrinsically provides their in silico evidence based on available data. Public availability within the GPKB (http://www.bioinformatics.deib.polimi.it/GPKB/) of all identified and integrated annotations offers a valuable resource fostering new biomedical-molecular knowledge discoveries.