Sequencing error profiles of Illumina sequencing instruments.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Stoler N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8002175 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundIllumina's sequencing platforms are currently the most utilised sequencing systems worldwide. The technology has rapidly evolved over recent years and provides high throughput at low costs with increasing read-lengths and true paired-end reads. However, data from any sequencing technology contains noise and our understanding of the peculiarities and sequencing errors encountered in Illumina data has lagged behind this rapid development.ResultsWe conducted a systematic investigation of errors and biases in Illumina data based on the largest collection of in vitro metagenomic data sets to date. We evaluated the Genome Analyzer II, HiSeq and MiSeq and tested state-of-the-art low input library preparation methods. Analysing in vitro metagenomic sequencing data allowed us to determine biases directly associated with the actual sequencing process. The position- and nucleotide-specific analysis revealed a substantial bias related to motifs (3mers preceding errors) ending in "GG". On average the top three motifs were linked to 16 % of all substitution errors. Furthermore, a preferential incorporation of ddGTPs was recorded. We hypothesise that all of these biases are related to the engineered polymerase and ddNTPs which are intrinsic to any sequencing-by-synthesis method. We show that quality-score-based error removal strategies can on average remove 69 % of the substitution errors - however, the motif-bias remains.ConclusionSingle-nucleotide polymorphism changes in bacterial genomes can cause significant changes in phenotype, including antibiotic resistance and virulence, detecting them within metagenomes is therefore vital. Current error removal techniques are not designed to target the peculiarities encountered in Illumina sequencing data and other sequencing-by-synthesis methods, causing biases to persist and potentially affect any conclusions drawn from the data. In order to develop effective diagnostic and therapeutic approaches we need to be able to identify systematic sequencing errors and distinguish these errors from true genetic variation.
| S-EPMC4787001 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Guaranteeing high-quality next-generation sequencing data in a rapidly changing environment is an ongoing challenge. The introduction of the Illumina NextSeq 500 and the depreciation of specific metrics from Illumina's Sequencing Analysis Viewer (SAV; Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) have made it more difficult to determine directly the baseline error rate of sequencing runs. To improve our ability to measure base quality, we have created an open-source tool to construct the Percent Perfect Reads (PPR) plot, previously provided by the Illumina sequencers. The PPR program is compatible with HiSeq 2000/2500, MiSeq, and NextSeq 500 instruments and provides an alternative to Illumina's quality value (Q) scores for determining run quality. Whereas Q scores are representative of run quality, they are often overestimated and are sourced from different look-up tables for each platform. The PPR's unique capabilities as a cross-instrument comparison device, as a troubleshooting tool, and as a tool for monitoring instrument performance can provide an increase in clarity over SAV metrics that is often crucial for maintaining instrument health. These capabilities are highlighted.
| S-EPMC5026502 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MotivationNext-generation deep sequencing of viral genomes, particularly on the Illumina platform, is increasingly applied in HIV research. Yet, there is no standard protocol or method used by the research community to account for measurement errors that arise during sample preparation and sequencing. Correctly calling high and low-frequency variants while controlling for erroneous variants is an important precursor to downstream interpretation, such as studying the emergence of HIV drug-resistance mutations, which in turn has clinical applications and can improve patient care.ResultsWe developed a new variant-calling pipeline, hivmmer, for Illumina sequences from HIV viral genomes. First, we validated hivmmer by comparing it to other variant-calling pipelines on real HIV plasmid datasets. We found that hivmmer achieves a lower rate of erroneous variants, and that all methods agree on the frequency of correctly called variants. Next, we compared the methods on an HIV plasmid dataset that was sequenced using Primer ID, an amplicon-tagging protocol, which is designed to reduce errors and amplification bias during library preparation. We show that the Primer ID consensus exhibits fewer erroneous variants compared to the variant-calling pipelines, and that hivmmer more closely approaches this low error rate compared to the other pipelines. The frequency estimates from the Primer ID consensus do not differ significantly from those of the variant-calling pipelines.Availability and implementationhivmmer is freely available for non-commercial use from https://github.com/kantorlab/hivmmer.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC7963075 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Advances in both high-throughput sequencing and whole-genome amplification (WGA) protocols have allowed genomes to be sequenced from femtograms of DNA, for example from individual cells or from precious clinical and archived samples. Using the highly curated Caenorhabditis elegans genome as a reference, we have sequenced and identified errors and biases associated with Illumina library construction, library insert size, different WGA methods and genome features such as GC bias and simple repeat content. Detailed analysis of the reads from amplified libraries revealed characteristics suggesting that majority of amplified fragment ends are identical but inverted versions of each other. Read coverage in amplified libraries is correlated with both tandem and inverted repeat content, while GC content only influences sequencing in long-insert libraries. Nevertheless, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calls and assembly metrics from reads in amplified libraries show comparable results with unamplified libraries. To utilize the full potential of WGA to reveal the real biological interest, this article highlights the importance of recognizing additional sources of errors from amplified sequence reads and discusses the potential implications in downstream analyses.
| S-EPMC4060946 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSequencing errors are key confounding factors for detecting low-frequency genetic variants that are important for cancer molecular diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance using deep next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of errors introduced at various steps of a conventional NGS workflow, such as sample handling, library preparation, PCR enrichment, and sequencing. In this study, we use current NGS technology to systematically investigate these questions.ResultsBy evaluating read-specific error distributions, we discover that the substitution error rate can be computationally suppressed to 10-5 to 10-4, which is 10- to 100-fold lower than generally considered achievable (10-3) in the current literature. We then quantify substitution errors attributable to sample handling, library preparation, enrichment PCR, and sequencing by using multiple deep sequencing datasets. We find that error rates differ by nucleotide substitution types, ranging from 10-5 for A>C/T>G, C>A/G>T, and C>G/G>C changes to 10-4 for A>G/T>C changes. Furthermore, C>T/G>A errors exhibit strong sequence context dependency, sample-specific effects dominate elevated C>A/G>T errors, and target-enrichment PCR led to ~ 6-fold increase of overall error rate. We also find that more than 70% of hotspot variants can be detected at 0.1 ~ 0.01% frequency with the current NGS technology by applying in silico error suppression.ConclusionsWe present the first comprehensive analysis of sequencing error sources in conventional NGS workflows. The error profiles revealed by our study highlight new directions for further improving NGS analysis accuracy both experimentally and computationally, ultimately enhancing the precision of deep sequencing.
| S-EPMC6417284 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MotivationIllumina Sequencing data can provide high coverage of a genome by relatively short (most often 100 bp to 150 bp) reads at a low cost. Even with low (advertised 1%) error rate, 100 × coverage Illumina data on average has an error in some read at every base in the genome. These errors make handling the data more complicated because they result in a large number of low-count erroneous k-mers in the reads. However, there is enough information in the reads to correct most of the sequencing errors, thus making subsequent use of the data (e.g. for mapping or assembly) easier. Here we use the term "error correction" to denote the reduction in errors due to both changes in individual bases and trimming of unusable sequence. We developed an error correction software called QuorUM. QuorUM is mainly aimed at error correcting Illumina reads for subsequent assembly. It is designed around the novel idea of minimizing the number of distinct erroneous k-mers in the output reads and preserving the most true k-mers, and we introduce a composite statistic π that measures how successful we are at achieving this dual goal. We evaluate the performance of QuorUM by correcting actual Illumina reads from genomes for which a reference assembly is available.ResultsWe produce trimmed and error-corrected reads that result in assemblies with longer contigs and fewer errors. We compared QuorUM against several published error correctors and found that it is the best performer in most metrics we use. QuorUM is efficiently implemented making use of current multi-core computing architectures and it is suitable for large data sets (1 billion bases checked and corrected per day per core). We also demonstrate that a third-party assembler (SOAPdenovo) benefits significantly from using QuorUM error-corrected reads. QuorUM error corrected reads result in a factor of 1.1 to 4 improvement in N50 contig size compared to using the original reads with SOAPdenovo for the data sets investigated.AvailabilityQuorUM is distributed as an independent software package and as a module of the MaSuRCA assembly software. Both are available under the GPL open source license at http://www.genome.umd.edu.Contactgmarcais@umd.edu.
| S-EPMC4471408 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We identified the sequence-specific starting positions of consecutive miscalls in the mapping of reads obtained from the Illumina Genome Analyser (GA). Detailed analysis of the miscall pattern indicated that the underlying mechanism involves sequence-specific interference of the base elongation process during sequencing. The two major sequence patterns that trigger this sequence-specific error (SSE) are: (i) inverted repeats and (ii) GGC sequences. We speculate that these sequences favor dephasing by inhibiting single-base elongation, by: (i) folding single-stranded DNA and (ii) altering enzyme preference. This phenomenon is a major cause of sequence coverage variability and of the unfavorable bias observed for population-targeted methods such as RNA-seq and ChIP-seq. Moreover, SSE is a potential cause of false single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calls and also significantly hinders de novo assembly. This article highlights the importance of recognizing SSE and its underlying mechanisms in the hope of enhancing the potential usefulness of the Illumina sequencers.
| S-EPMC3141275 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MotivationFor genotype and haplotype inference, typically, sequencing reads aligned to a reference genome are used. The alignments identify the genomic origin of the reads and help to infer the absence or presence of sequence variants in the genome. Since long sequencing reads often come with high rates of systematic sequencing errors, single nucleotides in the reads are not always correctly aligned to the reference genome, which can thus lead to wrong conclusions about the allele carried by a sequencing read at the variant site. Thus, allele detection is not a trivial task, especially for single-nucleotide polymorphisms and indels.ResultsTo learn the characteristics of sequencing errors, we introduce a method to create an error model in non-variant regions of the genome. This information is later used to distinguish sequencing errors from alternative alleles in variant regions. We show that our method, k-merald, improves allele detection accuracy leading to better genotyping performance as compared to the existing WhatsHap implementation using edit-distance-based allele detection, with a decrease of 18% and 24% in error rate for high-coverage Oxford Nanopore and PacBio CLR sequencing reads for sample HG002, respectively. We additionally observed a prominent improvement in genotyping performance for sequencing data with low coverage. For 3× coverage Oxford Nanopore sequencing data, the genotyping error rate reduced from 34% to 31%, corresponding to a 9% decrease.Availability and implementationhttps://github.com/whatshap/whatshap.
| S-EPMC10625474 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA number of simulators have been developed for emulating next-generation sequencing data by incorporating known errors such as base substitutions and indels. However, their practicality may be degraded by functional and runtime limitations. Particularly, the positional and genomic contextual information is not effectively utilized for reliably characterizing base substitution patterns, as well as the positional and contextual difference of Phred quality scores is not fully investigated. Thus, a more effective and efficient bioinformatics tool is sorely required.ResultsHere, we introduce a novel tool, SimuSCoP, to reliably emulate complex DNA sequencing data. The base substitution patterns and the statistical behavior of quality scores in Illumina sequencing data are fully explored and integrated into the simulation model for reliably emulating datasets for different applications. In addition, an integrated and easy-to-use pipeline is employed in SimuSCoP to facilitate end-to-end simulation of complex samples, and high runtime efficiency is achieved by implementing the tool to run in multithreading with low memory consumption. These features enable SimuSCoP to gets substantial improvements in reliability, functionality, practicality and runtime efficiency. The tool is comprehensively evaluated in multiple aspects including consistency of profiles, simulation of genomic variations and complex tumor samples, and the results demonstrate the advantages of SimuSCoP over existing tools.ConclusionsSimuSCoP, a new bioinformatics tool is developed to learn informative profiles from real sequencing data and reliably mimic complex data by introducing various genomic variations. We believe that the presented work will catalyse new development of downstream bioinformatics methods for analyzing sequencing data.
| S-EPMC7379788 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MotivationThe Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer, currently in pre-release testing through the MinION Access Programme (MAP), promises long reads in real-time from an inexpensive, compact, USB device. Tools have been released to extract FASTA/Q from the MinION base calling output and to provide basic yield statistics. However, no single tool yet exists to provide comprehensive alignment-based quality control and error profile analysis--something that is extremely important given the speed with which the platform is evolving.ResultsNanoOK generates detailed tabular and graphical output plus an in-depth multi-page PDF report including error profile, quality and yield data. NanoOK is multi-reference, enabling detailed analysis of metagenomic or multiplexed samples. Four popular Nanopore aligners are supported and it is easily extensible to include others.Availability and implementationNanoOK is an open-source software, implemented in Java with supporting R scripts. It has been tested on Linux and Mac OS X and can be downloaded from https://github.com/TGAC/NanoOK. A VirtualBox VM containing all dependencies and the DH10B read set used in this article is available from http://opendata.tgac.ac.uk/nanook/. A Docker image is also available from Docker Hub--see program documentation https://documentation.tgac.ac.uk/display/NANOOK.Contactrichard.leggett@tgac.ac.ukSupplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC4681994 | biostudies-literature