Dataset Information

The impact of ARID1A mutation on molecular characteristics in colorectal cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

ARID1A is a key subunit of the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex which regulates dynamic repositioning of nucleosomes to repair DNA damage. Only small pilot studies have evaluated the role of ARID1A mutation in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the present study was to explore the potential impact of ARID1A mutation on clinicopathological and molecular characteristics in CRC.

Methods

We used integrated data sets of 7978 CRC cases (one data set from a clinical laboratory improvement amendments [CLIA]-certified laboratory and three independent published data sets). The associations of ARID1A mutation with molecular characteristics including immune profile (the status of microsatellite instability [MSI], tumour mutational burden [TMB], programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] and estimated infiltrating immune cells), clinicopathological features and related pathways were analysed using next-generation sequencing, RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry.

Results

ARID1A mutant samples had more genomically unstable tumour features (MSI-high and TMB-high) and exhibited more characteristics of a T-cell-inflamed microenvironment (PD-L1 expression and high estimated infiltrating cytotoxic T lymphocytes [CTLs]) than ARID1A wild-type samples in the discovery and validation cohorts. Even ARID1A mutant samples without MSI-high status were TMB-high, had high levels of PD-L1 expression and high estimated infiltrating CTLs. ARID1A mutations were more common with right-sided primary and earlier stage tumours. ARID1A mutant tumours mainly had co-occurring gene mutations related to chromatin modifying, DNA repair, WNT signalling and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor resistance pathways, and ARID1A mutations strongly regulated DNA repair pathways. Key genes for chemotherapy/radiotherapy sensitivity were suppressed in ARID1A mutant samples.

Conclusions

Our findings may provide novel insights to develop individualised approaches for treatment of CRC based on ARID1A mutation status.

SUBMITTER: Tokunaga R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8009046 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundARID1A has been described as a tumor suppressor gene, participating in chromatin re-modeling, epithelial-mesenchymal-transition and many other cellular and molecular processes. It has been cited as a contribute in tumorigenesis. The role of ARID1A in CRC is not yet defined.AimTo investigate the role of ARID1A methylation and CNV in its expression in CRC cell lines and to examine the relationship between ARID1A status with survival and clinicopathologic characteristics in patients with CRC.MethodsWe used RT-PCR to determine both CNV and expression of ARID1A from six CRC cell lines. We used MSP to evaluate methylation of ARID1A. IHC was used to assess ARID1A protein expression. We also evaluated MSI and EMAST status in 18 paired CRC and adjacent normal tissues. 5AzadC was used to assess effect of DNA demethylation on ARID1A expression. Statistical analysis was performed to establish correlations between ARID1A expression and other parameters.ResultsAmong the 18 CRC tumors studied, 7 (38.8%) and 5 tumors (27.7%) showed no or low ARID1A expression, respectively. We observed no significant difference in ARID1A expression for overall patient survival, and no difference between clinicopathological parameters including MSI and EMAST. However, lymphatic invasion was more pronounced in the low/no ARID1A expression group when compared to moderate and high expression group (33% VS. 16.6% respectively. ARID1A promoter methylation was observed in 4/6 (66%) cell lines and correlated with ARID1A mRNA expression level ranging from very low in SW48, to more pronounced in HCT116 and HT-29/219. Treatment with the methyltransferase inhibitor 5-Azacytidine (5-aza) resulted in a 25.4-fold and 6.1-fold increase in ARID1A mRNA expression in SW48 and SW742 cells, respectively, while there was no change in SW480 and LS180 cells. No ARID1A CNV was observed in the CRC cell lines.ConclusionARID1A expression is downregulated in CRC tissues which correlates with it being a tumor suppressor protein. This finding confirms ARID1A loss of expression in CRC development. Our in-vitro results suggest high methylation status associates with reduced ARID1A expression and contributes to CRC tumorigenesis. However, there was no significant association between ARID1A loss of expression and clinicopathological characteristics. Future in-vivo analysis is warranted to further establish ARID1A role in colorectal neoplastic transformation.

Project description:PurposeAT-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A) is commonly mutated in colorectal cancer, frequently resulting in truncation and loss of protein expression. ARID1A recruits MSH2 for mismatch repair during DNA replication. ARID1A deficiency promotes hypermutability and immune activation in preclinical models, but its role in patients with colorectal cancer is being explored.Experimental designThe DNA sequencing and gene expression profiling of patients with colorectal cancer were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas and MD Anderson Cancer Center databases, with validation utilizing external databases, and correlation between ARID1A and immunologic features. IHC for T-cell markers was performed on a separate cohort of patients.ResultsTwenty-eight of 417 patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (6.7%) had ARID1A mutation. Among 58 genes most commonly mutated in colorectal cancer, ARID1A mutation had the highest increase with frameshift mutation rates in MSS cases (8-fold, P < 0.001). In MSS, ARID1A mutation was enriched in immune subtype (CMS1) and had a strong correlation with IFNγ expression (Δz score +1.91, P < 0.001). Compared with ARID1A wild-type, statistically significant higher expression for key checkpoint genes (e.g., PD-L1, CTLA4, and PDCD1) and gene sets (e.g., antigen presentation, cytotoxic T-cell function, and immune checkpoints) was observed in mutant cases. This was validated by unsupervised differential expression of genes related to immune response and further confirmed by higher infiltration of T cells in IHC of tumors with ARID1A mutation (P = 0.01).ConclusionsThe immunogenicity of ARID1A-mutant cases is likely due to an increased level of neoantigens resulting from increased tumor mutational burden and frameshift mutations. Tumors with ARID1A mutation may be more susceptible to immune therapy-based treatment strategies and should be recognized as a unique molecular subgroup in future immune therapy trials.

Project description:AIM:To investigate the prognostic value of KRAS mutation, and phosphatase and tensin (PTEN) expression in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with cetuximab. METHODS:Ninety Chinese mCRC patients treated with cetuximab were evaluated for KRAS mutation and PTEN protein expression by DNA sequencing of codons 12 and 13 and immunohistochemistry, respectively. We then selected 61 patients treated with cetuximab, either in combination with chemotherapy, or alone as a second-line or third-line regimen to assess whether KRAS mutation or PTEN protein expression is associated with the response and the survival time of mCRC patients treated with cetuximab. RESULTS:KRAS mutation was found in 30 (33.3%) tumor samples from the 90 patients, and positive PTEN expression was detected in 58 (64.4%) of the 90 patients. Among the 61 patients who were treated with cetuximab as a second-line or third-line regimen, the resistance to cetuximab was found in 22 patients with KRAS mutation and in 39 patients without KRAS mutation, with a response rate of 4.5% and 46.1% respectively (P = 0.001), a shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) time of 14 ± 1.3 wk and 32 ± 2.5 wk respectively (P < 0.001), a median overall survival (OS) time of 11 ± 1.2 mo and 19 ± 1.8 mo respectively (P < 0.001), as well as in 24 patients with negative PTEN expression and in 37 patients with positive PTEN expression respectively (P < 0.001), with a responsive rate of 4.2% and 48.6% respectively, a shorter median PFS survival time of 17 ± 2.0 wk and 28 ± 1.9 wk respectively (P = 0.07), and a median OS time of 11 ± 1.3 mo and 18 ± 1.9 mo respectively (P = 0.004). Combined KRAS mutation and PTEN expression analysis showed that the PFS and OS time of patients with two favorable prognostic factors were longer than those of patients with one favorable prognostic factor or no favorable prognostic factor (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION:KRAS mutation and PTEN protein expression are significantly correlated with the response rate and survival time of Chinese mCRC patients treated with cetuximab.