Dataset Information

Combustible cigarettes, heated tobacco products, combined product use, and periodontal disease: A cross-sectional JASTIS study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Combustible cigarettes have detrimental effects on periodontal disease. However, little evidence is available regarding new heated tobacco product (HTP) use and combined product use (both combustible cigarettes and HTPs). This study aimed to examine the association of combustible cigarettes, HTPs, and combined product use with periodontal disease simultaneously.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2019 arm of the longitudinal Japan "Society and New Tobacco" Internet Survey. Combustible cigarette users, HTP users, combined product users, never-users, and former users' data were separately obtained. In the present study, the primary outcome was self-reported periodontal disease. We estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis after adjusting for 12 confounders.

Results

Of the 10,439 JASTIS respondents, the numbers of users of combustible cigarettes only, HTPs only, and both products were 1,304, 437, and 1,049, respectively. Compared with never-users, HTP use was significantly associated with the prevalence of self-reported periodontal diseases (PR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03-1.62). Moreover, former users, combustible cigarette users, and combined product users also showed significant associations (PR 1.56, 95% CI 1.35-1.80; PR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62; and PR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-1.99, respectively).

Conclusions

Users of HTPs, combustible cigarettes, and combined products as well as former users were all significantly associated with a higher prevalence of periodontal diseases compared to never-users.

SUBMITTER: Yoshioka T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8009369 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Adverse outcome pathways (AOP) contain summarizing sequences of key events (KE) relating toxicant exposures to specific adverse outcomes (AO) observed in exposed populations. Quantitative AOPs (qAOP) provide frameworks to assess AO risks based on KE quantification and the modeling of their relationships. This work aimed to develop the quantitative component of AOP 411 <Oxidative stress leading to decreased lung function>. To examine the pertinence of the resulting qAOP-based risk assessment approach, we applied it to predict the medium-term lung function evolution after switching from combustible cigarettes (CC) to heated tobacco products (HTP). We used publicly available data for oxidative stress (in vitro), ciliary beating frequency (in vitro), mucociliary clearance (human), and lung function (human). Following the course of smoking-related lung function decline (Fletcher and Peto, 1977, PMID 871704), we assumed a non-monotonic time evolution where the risk of the AO <decreased lung function> begins to decline after quitting smoking CC or switching to HTP use. Consequently, we designed our qAOP to evaluate the relative reduction (RR) of AO risk for HTP switching compared to the two scenarios of continuing or quitting CC consumption. We developed both data- and physiology-based KE relationship (KER) models. Despite sparse data with respect to dose- and time-response relationships, we successfully connected the measured KEs through in silico KER models. We then used the resulting qAOP to evaluate the exposure effects of switching from CC smoking to HTP use along AOP 411. This approach enabled in silico prediction of the AO RR for which in vivo data were not yet available. In summary, our qAOP provides a multiscale mechanistic approach to evaluate medium-term lung function evolution for the use case of switching from CC smoking to HTP use. The presented approach demonstrates how 21st Century Toxicology principles such as in vitro testing and in silico predictions can be integrated to achieve a meaningful risk assessment approach. It also represents a starting point for integrating additional AOP into an extended AOP network that includes other mechanisms leading to decreased lung function.

Project description:BackgroundWorldwide adoption of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) has increased exponentially over the past decade. These products have been proposed as non-combustible alternatives to traditional tobacco products such as cigarettes and may thus reduce the negative health consequences associated with tobacco smoke. However, the overall health impact and safety of using these products remains unclear. This review seeks to provide an updated summary of available evidence on changes to levels of tobacco-related biomarkers to aid the overall assessment of the consequences of using e-cigarettes and HTPs.MethodsA systematic review was conducted through major databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE) searching for articles directly comparing biomarker levels in humans using e-cigarettes or HTPs and those using combustible cigarettes. We included peer reviewed articles with comparative or longitudinal design and extracted key information for our purpose (type of population, demographics, biomarkers measurements, and health effects). An initial qualitative analysis was performed followed by a summary of findings.ResultsA total of 44 studies were included from initial citations. The vast majority of the literature reported reductions in levels of biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure (BOE), especially nicotine, MHBMA, 3-HPMA, S-PMA, 1-OHP and NNAL, when using e-cigarettes and HTPs compared to combustible cigarettes. There was a slight tendency toward a larger reduction in these biomarkers levels with the use of e-cigarettes, although direct comparisons between e-cigarettes and HTPs were lacking. There was also a trend toward positive changes in levels of biomarkers of biological effect (BOBE) with the use of e-cigarettes and HTPs.ConclusionsA comparison of levels of biomarkers of tobacco-related exposure collected in clinical studies revealed that the use of e-cigarettes and HTPs could lead to a significant reduction in exposure to harmful substances compared to combusted cigarettes. In tandem, the health status of e-cigarettes and HTP users, indexed by levels of biomarkers of biological effect showed potential for improvement compared to smoking. However, larger and longer-term population-based studies are needed to further clarify these findings.

Project description:BACKGROUND:For novel tobacco products that potentially reduce the risk of tobacco harm, post-market surveillance is important to observe population usage and behaviours associated with everyday use. This pilot study was performed to examine the use of tobacco products in three Japanese urban regions. METHODS:This study was a cross-sectional epidemiological survey administered in Sendai, Tokyo and Osaka, Japan, from May 19th to June 25th, 2018. Participants were selected with a three-stage probability random sampling process that first identified primary sampling units, then households and finally individuals. Eligible participants were aged at least 20 years who were willing to participate after information about the study was provided. People younger than 20 years and those living in institutions were excluded. Questionnaires were paper based and administered door to door. RESULTS:Responses were obtained from 4154 participants. Sixty-five percent self-reported being never, 19% current and 16% former users of any tobacco product at the time of the survey. Combustible tobacco products (almost all being cigarette) were used most (16%) followed by HTPs (5%). In the categories of combustible tobacco users and HTP users, 70% and 16%, respectively, used these products exclusively. Dual use was reported by 11% of respondents. Compared with 12 months before the survey, 12% of sole combustible tobacco products users were using HTPs exclusively or as dual users and 6% had quit tobacco products completely; 94% of sole HTP users remained sole users and 4% had quit tobacco products completely; and amongst dual users 12% had reverted to exclusive use of combustible tobacco products, 14% had switched to sole use of HTPs and 4% had quit tobacco products completely. CONCLUSION:HTPs seem to be accepted as an alternative tobacco product amongst combustible tobacco users. Given complex findings for dual use, improved understanding of the motivations underlying this behaviour would be of interest.