Dataset Information

The impact of sacrospinous ligament fixation on pre-existing nocturia and co-existing pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction and hypothesis

To evaluate whether nocturia and coexisting pelvic floor symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can be improved by ligamentous fixation of apical vaginal prolapse to the sacrospinous ligament.

Methods

We evaluated the PROPEL study data from 281 women with pelvic organ prolapse stage > 2. Bothersome nocturia and coexisting pelvic floor symptoms were assessed with the Pelvic Floor Disorder Inventory (PFDI) questionnaire preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months after successful vaginal prolapse repair. Women with successful reconstruction (POP-Q stage < 1 at all compartments throughout the 2-year follow-up), defined as anatomical "responders," were compared to the anatomical "non-responders."

Results

Among the patients completing all PFDI questions (N = 277), anatomical responders and non-responders were the groups of interest for our analysis. We found the occurrence rates of "moderate" or "quite a bit" of nocturia was significantly reduced after surgery in all subgroups (48.7% at baseline vs. 19.5% after 24 months). The occurrence of nocturia was halved for responders compared to non-responders (45.4% and 48.3% at baseline vs. 14% and 29.5% after 24 months). Anatomical non-responders still had a relevant improvement of POP-Q stages, especially in the apical compartment. Prevalence rates of co-existing over- and underactive bladder, fecal incontinence, defecation disorders and pain symptoms were also significantly reduced postoperatively.

Conclusion

Nocturia can be associated with symptomatic POP, with improvements seen following vaginal ligamentous prolapse repair. We caution providers, however, when advising patients of the possible resolution of nocturia following POP reconstruction, that all other traditional etiologies of nocturia must first be ruled out.

SUBMITTER: Himmler M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8009795 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Uterosacral ligament suspension (ULS) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) are commonly performed pelvic organ prolapse procedures despite a lack of long-term efficacy data. Objective:To compare outcomes in women randomized to (1) ULS or SSLF and (2) usual care or perioperative behavioral therapy and pelvic floor muscle training (BPMT) for vaginal apical prolapse. Design, Setting, and Participants:This 2 × 2 factorial randomized clinical trial was conducted at 9 US medical centers. Eligible participants who completed the Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss Trial enrolled between January 2008 and March 2011 and were followed up 5 years after their index surgery from April 2011 through June 2016. Interventions:Two randomizations: (1) BPMT (n = 186) or usual care (n = 188) and (2) surgical intervention (ULS: n = 188 or SSLF: n = 186). Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary surgical outcome was time to surgical failure. Surgical failure was defined as (1) apical descent greater than one-third of total vaginal length or anterior or posterior vaginal wall beyond the hymen or retreatment for prolapse (anatomic failure), or (2) bothersome bulge symptoms. The primary behavioral outcomes were time to anatomic failure and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores (range, 0-300). Results:The original study randomized 374 patients, of whom 309 were eligible for this extended trial. For this study, 285 enrolled (mean age, 57.2 years), of whom 244 (86%) completed the extended trial. By year 5, the estimated surgical failure rate was 61.5% in the ULS group and 70.3% in the SSLF group (adjusted difference, -8.8% [95% CI, -24.2 to 6.6]). The estimated anatomic failure rate was 45.6% in the BPMT group and 47.2% in the usual care group (adjusted difference, -1.6% [95% CI, -21.2 to 17.9]). Improvements in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores were -59.4 in the BPMT group and -61.8 in the usual care group (adjusted mean difference, 2.4 [95% CI, -13.7 to 18.4]). Conclusions and Relevance:Among women who had undergone vaginal surgery for apical pelvic organ vaginal prolapse, there was no significant difference between ULS and SSLF in rates of surgical failure and no significant difference between perioperative behavioral muscle training and usual care on rates of anatomic success and symptom scores at 5 years. Compared with outcomes at 2 years, rates of surgical failure increased during the follow-up period, although prolapse symptom scores remained improved. Trial Registration:clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01166373.

Project description:Introduction and hypothesisIn order to improve the knowledge POP physiopathology and POP repair, a generic biomechanical model of the female pelvic system has been developed. In the literature, no study has currently evaluated apical prolapse repair by posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation using a generic model nor a patient-specific model that personalize the management of POP and predict surgical outcomes based on the patient's pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of a right and/or left sacrospinous ligament fixation and the distance between the anchorage area and the ischial spine on the pelvic organ mobility using a generic and a patient-specific Finite Element model (FEM) of the female pelvic system during posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF).MethodsFirstly, we used a generic 3D FEM of the female pelvic system previously made by our team that allowed us to simulate the mobility of the pelvic system. To create a patient-specific 3D FEM of the female pelvic system, we used a preoperative dynamic pelvic MRI of a 68 years old woman with a symptomatic stage III apical prolapse and cystocele. With these 2 models, a SSF was simulated. A right and/or left SSF and different distances between the anchorage area and the ischial spine (1 cm, 2 cm and 3 cm.) were compared. Outcomes measures were the pelvic organ displacement using the pubococcygeal line during maximal strain: Ba point for the most posterior and inferior aspect of the bladder base, C point the cervix's or the vaginal apex and Bp point for the anterior aspect of the anorectal junction.ResultsOverall, pelvic organ mobility decreased regardless of surgical technique and model. According to the generic model, C point was displaced by 14.1 mm and 11.5 mm, Ba point by 12.7 mm, and 12 mm and Bp point by 10.6 mm and 9.9 mm after left and bilateral posterior SSF, respectively. C point was displaced by 15.4 mm and 11.6 mm and Ba point by 12.5 mm and 13.1mm when the suture on the sacrospinous ligament was performed at 1 cm and 3 cm from the ischial spine respectively (bilateral posterior SSF configuration). According to the patient-specific model, the displacement of Ba point could not be analyzed because of a significative and asymmetric organ displacement of the bladder. C point was displaced by 4.74 mm and 2.12 mm, and Bp point by 5.30 mm and 3.24 mm after left and bilateral posterior SSF respectively. C point was displaced by 4.80 mm and 4.85 mm and Bp point by 5.35 mm and 5.38 mm when the suture on the left sacrospinous ligament was performed at 1 cm and 3 cm from the ischial spine, respectively.ConclusionAccording to the generic model from our study, the apex appeared to be less mobile in bilateral SSF. The anchorage area on the sacrospinous ligament seems to have little effect on the pelvic organ mobilities.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04551859.