Dataset Information

Lung ultrasonography for long-term follow-up of COVID-19 survivors compared to chest CT scan.

ABSTRACT:

Background

While lung ultrasonography (LUS) has utility for the evaluation of the acute phase of COVID-19 related lung disease, its role in long-term follow-up of this condition has not been well described. The objective of this study is to compare LUS and chest computed tomography (CT) results in COVID-19 survivors with the intent of defining the utility of LUS for long-term follow-up of COVID-19 respiratory disease.

Methods

Prospective observational study that enrolled consecutive survivors of COVID-19 with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (HARF) admitted to the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit. Three months following hospital discharge, patients underwent LUS, chest CT, body plethysmography and laboratory testing, the comparison of which forms the basis of this report.

Results

38 patients were enrolled, with a total of 190 lobes analysed: men 27/38 (71.1%), mean age 60.6 y (SD 10.4). LUS findings and pulmonary function tests outcomes were compared between patients with and without ILD, showing a statistically significant difference in terms of LUS score (p: 0.0002), FEV1 (p: 0.0039) and FVC (p: 0.012). ROC curve both in lobe by lobe and in patient's overall analysis revealed an outstanding ILD discrimination ability of LUS (AUC: 0.94 and 0.95 respectively) with a substantial Cohen's coefficient (K: 0.74 and 0.69).

Conclusions

LUS has an outstanding discrimination ability compared to CT in identifying an ILD of at least mild grade in the post COVID-19 follow-up. LUS should be considered as the first-line tool in follow-up programs, while chest CT could be performed based on LUS findings.

SUBMITTER: Giovannetti G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8010331 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:Chest wall (CW) pain and rib fractures are frequently diagnosed after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for malignant lung tumors. We hypothesize that multiple risk factors, including bone mineral density (BMD), are associated with CW toxicity, and that CW pain and rib fractures often evolve into chronic clinical problems. METHODS AND MATERIALS:A total of 118 lung tumors treated with SBRT in 100 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence, clinical course, and related demographic, clinical, and dosimetric factors of CW pain and rib fractures were analyzed. In addition, BMD was assessed, and the radiographic appearance of radiation-induced rib fractures and their healing process were characterized. RESULTS:The median follow-up was 49 months (range, 24-106 months). CW pain developed in 33 of 118 treatments (28%) after, on average, 12.5 months (range, 0-50 months), and was more common in women (P = .04). The mean duration of CW pain was 25 months (range, 2-63 months), and 36% of patients never had resolution of CW pain. A total of 34 of 118 treatments (29%) resulted in rib fractures at a mean time of 22 months (range, 3-46 months); rib fractures were more common in women, African Americans, upper/middle lobe tumors, and patients with lower BMD (P < .05). The mean duration of rib fractures was 25 months (range, 5-41 months), and only 16 rib fractures (47%) healed. Shorter CW planning target volume distance resulted in a higher risk for both rib fractures and CW pain (P = .01). Sixty-seven percent of fractures developed surrounding soft tissue fibrosis, and 62% (21 of 34 fractures) heterotopic ossification. Diabetes, body mass index, and steroid use were not associated with CW pain or rib fracture. CONCLUSIONS:Several factors were associated with a higher risk of SBRT-related CW toxicity. Optimal CW sparing (eg, volumetric modulated arc therapy, lower dose per fraction) should be considered in this patient group without compromising tumor control. SBRT-induced rib fractures commonly heal abnormally and result in potential chronic CW pain.

Project description:BackgroundLung abnormalities do not fully resolve in all Covid-19 survivors and may progress to fibrosis. Understanding post-COVID lung changes helps identify patients susceptible of post-COVID-19 sequelae. We analyzed scannographic residual lung abnormalities and the full resolution percentage on intermediate- and long-term follow-up (3 months or more).MethodsData from 30 RT-PCR positive COVID-19 patients undergoing at least one follow-up chest CT at Ibn Sina Hospital, with a minimal time interval of 3 months between the RT-PCR and the CT performance were gathered retrospectively. The following elements were analyzed: (1) lung opacities, (2) distribution, (3) dominant lung opacity, (4) Sub-pleural bands, (5) Interlobular septal thickening, (6) Vascular dilatation, (7) Bronchiectasis, (8) Honey combing, (9) Architectural distortion, (10) mosaic attenuation, and (11) Additional findings: Enlarged lymph nodes, Pleural and Pericardial fluid. To evaluate the degree of lung opacification, a score founded on visual evaluation of the lung involvement's percentage was employed. Patients were then subdivided into two categories: (1) no residual opacities and (2) remaining pulmonary opacities.Outcomes30 patients were enrolled. The age ranged between 40 and 87 years. CT was indicated for symptoms or functional impairment. The time range between the positive RT-PCR and Follow-up CT varied between 3 and 12 months. CT severity score ranged between o and 23. Residual lung opacities were present in 24 cases (80%). The dominant lung opacities were Ground glass (46.7%), and linear/curvilinear opacities (23.3%). Signs of fibrosis were present in 9 patients (30%).ConclusionCT abnormalities following Covid-19 pneumonia's prevalence varies based on the extent of the original lung affection and the time gap since the acute phase. Residual anomalies' effects on respiratory physiology, symptoms, and quality of living are unknown. Maintained monitoring of COVID-19 survivors with clinical examination, iterative pulmonary function tests, and HRCT is advised.