Dataset Information

Efficacy, safety, and quality of life of generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients.

ABSTRACT: To report the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) on generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients. This was a single centre, prospective study of treatment-naive (TN), and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL patients receiving ibrutinib in India. The choice of innovator or generic ibrutinib was as per patient discretion. Response and adverse events were recorded as per the 2018 iwCLL guidelines and CTCAEv4.0. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CLL17 questionnaires. A total of 32 CLL patients (TN, n = 7 and R/R, n = 25) received ibrutinib from 2016-2019. The median age was 60 years (37-84). All TN patients attained partial response without any grade 3/4 adverse events (AE). Ibrutinib was less tolerated in the R/R setting, with 52% patients developing grade 3/4 AE and required dose reduction. Eleven patients (44%) died during follow-up. Grade 3-5 infections were seen in 44% of R/R CLL patients. Generic ibrutinib (n = 8) was comparable to innovator ibrutinib (n = 17) in terms of efficacy, safety, and QoL. Ibrutinib is less well tolerated in Indian R/R CLL patients. Infections are a common cause of morbidity and mortality. This study affirms the safety and efficacy of generic ibrutinib.

SUBMITTER: Singh C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8012457 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy, safety, and quality of life of generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients.

Singh Charanpreet C Jindal Nishant N Youron Padma P Malhotra Pankaj P Prakash Gaurav G Khadwal Alka A Jain Arihant A Sreedharanunni Sreejesh S Sachdeva Man Updesh Singh MUS Naseem Shano S Varma Neelam N Varma Subhash S Lad Deepesh P DP

Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 20201113 2

To report the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) on generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients. This was a single centre, prospective study of treatment-naive (TN), and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL patients receiving ibrutinib in India. The choice of innovator or generic ibrutinib was as per patient discretion. Response and adverse events were recorded as per the 2018 iwCLL guidelines and CTCAEv4.0. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CLL17 questionnaires. A total ...[more]

PMID: 33867740

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIbrutinib has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) since 2016 but has not been compared with chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of ibrutinib, either alone or in combination with rituximab, relative to chemoimmunotherapy.MethodsPatients 65 years of age or older who had untreated CLL were randomly assigned to receive bendamustine plus rituximab, ibrutinib, or ibrutinib plus rituximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. The Alliance Data and Safety Monitoring Board made the decision to release the data after the protocol-specified efficacy threshold had been met.ResultsA total of 183 patients were assigned to receive bendamustine plus rituximab, 182 to receive ibrutinib, and 182 to receive ibrutinib plus rituximab. Median progression-free survival was reached only with bendamustine plus rituximab. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 2 years was 74% with bendamustine plus rituximab and was higher with ibrutinib alone (87%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.58; P<0.001) and with ibrutinib plus rituximab (88%; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.59; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the ibrutinib-plus-rituximab group and the ibrutinib group with regard to progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.62; P=0.49). With a median follow-up of 38 months, there was no significant difference among the three treatment groups with regard to overall survival. The rate of grade 3, 4, or 5 hematologic adverse events was higher with bendamustine plus rituximab (61%) than with ibrutinib or ibrutinib plus rituximab (41% and 39%, respectively), whereas the rate of grade 3, 4, or 5 nonhematologic adverse events was lower with bendamustine plus rituximab (63%) than with the ibrutinib-containing regimens (74% with each regimen).ConclusionsAmong older patients with untreated CLL, treatment with ibrutinib was superior to treatment with bendamustine plus rituximab with regard to progression-free survival. There was no significant difference between ibrutinib and ibrutinib plus rituximab with regard to progression-free survival. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Pharmacyclics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01886872 .).

Dataset Information

Efficacy, safety, and quality of life of generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients.

Publications

Efficacy, safety, and quality of life of generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets