Dataset Information

Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for sinonasal diseases: differentiation of benign and malignant lesions.

ABSTRACT:

Background and purpose

CT and MR imaging features of benign and malignant sinonasal lesions are often nonspecific. Therefore, we evaluated the ADC-based differentiation of these lesions.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively assessed ADCs of 61 patients with histologically proved sinonasal tumors and tumorlike lesions: 19 benign lesions, 28 malignant tumors, and 14 inflammatory lesions. Overall ADCs and percentages of total tumor area with extremely low, low, intermediate, or high ADCs (ADC mapping) were determined by using 2 b-values (500 and 1000 s/mm(2)).

Results

ADCs of malignant tumors (0.87 ± 0.32 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) were significantly lower than those of benign (1.35 ± 0.29 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P < .0001) and inflammatory (1.50 ± 0.50 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P = .0002) lesions. On ADC mapping, percentages of total tumor area within malignant tumors having extremely low or low ADCs were significantly (P < .0001) greater than those within benign and inflammatory lesions. Cutoff points for ADC mapping (≥78% of tumor areas having extremely low or low ADCs) effectively differentiated benign or inflammatory lesions and malignant tumors with 75% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 85% accuracy, and 91% positive and 82% negative predictive values, respectively. ADCs also effectively discriminated lymphomas and SCCs from other malignant tumors.

Conclusions

ADC mapping may be an effective MR imaging tool for the differentiation of benign/inflammatory lesions from malignant tumors in the sinonasal area.

SUBMITTER: Sasaki M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8013129 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesWe undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived by diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI in the characterization of solid benign and malignant liver lesions, and to assess their value in discriminating these lesions in daily routine practice.MethodsA systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to retrieve studies that used ADC values for differentiating solid benign/dysplastic nodules and malignant liver lesions. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. This meta-analysis was performed on the per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) plot and area under curve (AUC) were created.ResultsA total of 14 original articles were retrieved. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating solid benign from malignant lesions were 78% (67-86%) and 74% (64-81%), respectively. The pooled (95% CI) positive and negative LRs were respectively 3 (2.3-3.8) and 0.3 (0.21-0.43). The DOR (95% CI) was 10 (7-15). The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC plot was 82% (78-85%). Reporting bias was negligible (p value of regression test = 0.36). Mean size of malignant lesions and breathing pattern of MRI were found to be sources of heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity.ConclusionADC measurement independently may not be an optimal diagnostic imaging method for differentiating solid malignant from solid benign hepatic lesions. The meta-analysis showed that ADC measurement had moderate diagnostic accuracy for characterizing solid liver lesions. Further prospective and comparative studies with pre-specified ADC thresholds could be performed to investigate the best MRI protocol and ADC threshold for characterizing solid liver lesions.Advances in knowledgeADC measurement by DW-MRI does not have a good diagnostic performance to differentiate solid malignant from solid benign lesions. Therefore, we suggest not using ADC values in clinical practice to evaluate solid liver lesions.

Project description:BackgroundSuspicious breast lesions [Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 or 5] detected only by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and invisible on other initial imaging modalities (MRI-only lesions) are usually small and poorly characterized in previous literature, thus making diagnosis and management difficult. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics derived from conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on evaluating MRI-only lesions.MethodsA total of 90 suspicious MRI-only lesions were evaluated, including 51 malignant and 39 benign lesions. Morphological and kinetic characteristics of all lesions (termed BI-RADS parameters) were described according to the BI-RADS lexicon on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. Minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values (ADCmin, ADCmax, ADCmean) were obtained by measuring the ADC map of DWI. ADCheterogeneity was then obtained by the following formula: ADCheterogeneity = (ADCmax - ADCmin)/ADCmean. Diagnostic performance of these parameters was assessed and compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsOf the 90 MRI-only lesions, there were 45 masses and 45 non-mass lesions. Among BI-RADS parameters, only two different kinetic patterns were significantly different between benign and malignant groups (P=0.005 and P<0.001, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of combined significant ADC parameters (ADCmin, ADCmean, and ADCmax, all P≤0.001) was significantly higher than that of the two different kinetic patterns (P=0.006 for both). For MRI-only masses, only ADCmean and ADCmax, among all BI-RADS and ADC parameters, had diagnostic value (combined AUC =0.833). For non-mass lesions, size, distribution, ADCmin, and ADCmean were significantly different between benign and malignant groups (P=0.004, P<0.001, P=0.001, and P<0.001, respectively). In addition, ADCmean had the highest diagnostic performance among all ADC parameters, regardless of mass or non-mass (AUC =0.825 and 0.812, respectively). ADCheterogeneity showed no significant differences, no matter in mass or non-mass groups (P=0.62 and 0.43, respectively).ConclusionsIn differentiating MRI-only suspicious lesions, quantitative ADC metrics generally performed better than BI-RADS parameters, and ADCmean is still the best ADC parameter to distinguish MRI-only lesions.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Available data proving the value of DWI for breast cancer diagnosis is mainly for enhancing masses; DWI may be less sensitive and specific in non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DWI using different ROI measurement approaches and ADC metrics in breast lesions presenting as NME lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. METHODS:In this retrospective study, 95 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI with DCE and DWI from September 2007 to July 2013 and who were diagnosed with a suspicious NME (BI-RADS 4/5) were included. Twenty-nine patients were excluded for lesion non-visibility on DWI (n?=?24: 12 benign and 12 malignant) and poor DWI quality (n?=?5: 1 benign and 4 malignant). Two readers independently assessed DWI and DCE-MRI findings in two separate randomized readings using different ADC metrics and ROI approaches. NME lesions were classified as either benign (>?1.3?×?10-3?mm2/s) or malignant (??1.3?×?10-3?mm2/s). Histopathology was the standard of reference. ROC curves were plotted, and AUCs were determined. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was measured. RESULTS:There were 39 malignant (59%) and 27 benign (41%) lesions in 66 (65 women, 1 man) patients (mean age, 51.8?years). The mean ADC value of the darkest part of the tumor (Dptu) achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs of up to 0.71. Inter-reader agreement was highest with Dptu ADC max (CCC 0.42) and lowest with the point tumor (Ptu) ADC min (CCC?=?-?0.01). Intra-reader agreement was highest with Wtu ADC mean (CCC?=?0.44 for reader 1, 0.41 for reader 2), but this was not associated with the highest diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS:Diagnostic accuracy of DWI with ADC mapping is limited in NME lesions. Thirty-one percent of lesions presenting as NME on DCE-MRI could not be evaluated with DWI, and therefore, DCE-MRI remains indispensable. Best results were achieved using Dptu 2D ROI measurement and ADC mean.

Project description:Background and Purpose- In this era of endovascular therapy (EVT) with early, complete recanalization and reperfusion, we have observed an even more rapid apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) normalization within the acute ischemic lesion compared with the natural history or IV-tPA-treated patient. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of revascularization on ADC evolution within the core lesion in the first 24 hours in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods- This retrospective study included anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT with or without intravenous tPA (IVT) from 2015 to 2017 compared with a consecutive cohort of IVT-only patients treated before 2015. Diffusion-weighted imaging and ADC maps were used to quantify baseline core lesions. Median ADC value change and core reversal were determined at 24 hours. Diffusion-weighted imaging lesion growth was measured at 24 hours and 5 days. Good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at 90 days. Results- Twenty-five patients (50%) received IVT while the other 25 patients received EVT (50%) with or without IVT. Between these patient groups, there were no differences in age, sex, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, interhospital transfer, or IVT rates. Thirty-two patients (64%) revascularized with 69% receiving EVT. There was a significant increase in median ADC value of the core lesion at 24 hours in patients who revascularized compared with further ADC reduction in nonrevascularization patients. Revascularization patients had a significantly higher rate of good clinical outcome at 90 days, 63% versus 9% (P=0.003). Core reversal at 24 hours was significantly higher in revascularization patients, 69% versus 22% (P=0.002). Conclusions- ADC evolution in acute ischemic stroke patients with early, complete revascularization, now more commonly seen with EVT, is strikingly different from our historical understanding. The early ADC normalization we have observed in this setting may include a component of secondary injury and serve as a potential imaging biomarker for the development of future adjunctive therapies. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00009243.

Project description:BackgroundClassifying and characterizing pulmonary lesions are critical for clinical decision-making process to identify optimal therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram for distinguishing between benign and malignant pulmonary lesions based on robust features derived from diffusion images.Material and methodsThe study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, we prospectively collected 30 patients with pulmonary nodule/mass who underwent twice EPI-DWI scans. The robustness of features between the two scans was evaluated using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and dynamic range (DR). In the second phase, 139 patients who underwent pulmonary DWI were randomly divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. Maximum relevance minimum redundancy, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and logistic regression were used for feature selection and construction of radiomics signatures. Nomograms were established incorporating clinical features, radiomics signatures, and ADC(0, 800). The diagnostic efficiency of different models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis.ResultsAmong the features extracted from DWI and ADC images, 42.7% and 37.4% were stable (both CCC and DR ≥ 0.85). The AUCs for distinguishing pulmonary lesions in the test set for clinical model, ADC, ADC radiomics signatures, and DWI radiomics signatures were 0.694, 0.802, 0.885, and 0.767, respectively. The nomogram exhibited the best differentiation performance (AUC = 0.923). The decision curve showed that the nomogram consistently outperformed ADC value and clinical model in lesion differentiation.ConclusionOur study demonstrates the robustness of radiomics features derived from lung DWI. The ADC radiomics nomogram shows superior clinical net benefits compared to conventional clinical models or ADC values alone in distinguishing solitary pulmonary lesions, offering a promising tool for noninvasive, precision diagnosis in lung cancer.