Deep Learning-based CT Image Reconstruction: Initial Evaluation Targeting Hypovascular Hepatic Metastases.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
To evaluate the effect of a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) method on the conspicuity of hypovascular hepatic metastases on abdominal CT images.Materials and methods
This retrospective study with institutional review board approval included 58 patients with hypovascular hepatic metastases. A radiologist recorded the standard deviation of attenuation in the paraspinal muscle as the image noise and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). CNR was calculated as region of interest ([ROI]L - ROIT)/N, where ROIL is the mean liver parenchyma attenuation, ROIT, the mean tumor attenuation, and N, the noise. Two other radiologists graded the conspicuity of the liver lesion on a five-point scale where 1 is unidentifiable and 5 is detected without diagnostic compromise. Only the smallest liver lesion in each patient, classified as smaller or larger than 10 mm, was evaluated. The difference between hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) and DLR images was determined by using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test.Results
The image noise was significantly lower, and the CNR was significantly higher on DLR images than hybrid IR images (median image noise: 19.2 vs 12.8 HU, P < .001; median CNR: tumors < 10 mm: 1.9 vs 2.5; tumors > 10 mm: 1.7 vs 2.2, both P < .001). The scores for liver lesions were significantly higher for DLR images than hybrid IR images (P < .01 for both in tumors smaller or larger than 10 mm).Conclusion
DLR improved the quality of abdominal CT images for the evaluation of hypovascular hepatic metastases.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.
SUBMITTER: Nakamura Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8017421 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:We investigated the effect of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) compared to iterative reconstruction on image quality in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). For 220 patients with suspected PE, CTPA studies were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V 30%, 60% and 90%) and DLIR (low, medium and high strength). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) served as the primary parameter of objective image quality. Subgroup analyses were performed for normal weight, overweight and obese individuals. For patients with confirmed PE (n = 40), we further measured PE-specific CNR. Subjective image quality was assessed independently by two experienced radiologists. CNR was lowest for FBP and enhanced with increasing levels of ASiR-V and, even more with increasing strength of DLIR. High strength DLIR resulted in an additional improvement in CNR by 29-67% compared to ASiR-V 90% (p < 0.05). PE-specific CNR increased by 75% compared to ASiR-V 90% (p < 0.05). Subjective image quality was significantly higher for medium and high strength DLIR compared to all other image reconstructions (p < 0.05). In CT pulmonary angiography, DLIR significantly outperforms iterative reconstruction for increasing objective and subjective image quality. This may allow for further reductions in radiation exposure in suspected PE.
| S-EPMC10827738 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo compare the image quality between a deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm (DLIR) and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V) in noncontrast trauma head CT.MethodsHead CT scans from 94 consecutive trauma patients were included. Images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 50% and the DLIR strengths: low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H). The image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively and compared between the different reconstruction algorithms. Inter-reader agreement was assessed by weighted kappa.ResultsDLIR-M and DLIR-H demonstrated lower image noise (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons), higher SNR of up to 82.9% (p < 0.001), and higher CNR of up to 53.3% (p < 0.001) compared to ASiR-V. DLIR-H outperformed other DLIR strengths (p ranging from < 0.001 to 0.016). DLIR-M outperformed DLIR-L (p < 0.001) and ASiR-V (p < 0.001). The distribution of reader scores for DLIR-M and DLIR-H shifted towards higher scores compared to DLIR-L and ASiR-V. There was a tendency towards higher scores with increasing DLIR strengths. There were fewer non-diagnostic CT series for DLIR-M and DLIR-H compared to ASiR-V and DLIR-L. No images were graded as non-diagnostic for DLIR-H regarding intracranial hemorrhage. The inter-reader agreement was fair-good between the second most and the less experienced reader, poor-moderate between the most and the less experienced reader, and poor-fair between the most and the second most experienced reader.ConclusionThe image quality of trauma head CT series reconstructed with DLIR outperformed those reconstructed with ASiR-V. In particular, DLIR-M and DLIR-H demonstrated significantly improved image quality and fewer non-diagnostic images. The improvement in qualitative image quality was greater for the second most and the less experienced readers compared to the most experienced reader.
| S-EPMC8917108 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo perform a comprehensive within-subject image quality analysis of abdominal CT examinations reconstructed with DLIR and to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared to the routinely applied adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) algorithm.Materials and methodsOncologic patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Images were reconstructed with DLIR with three intensity levels of reconstruction (high, medium, and low) and ASiR-V at strength levels from 10 to 100% with a 10% interval. Three radiologists characterized the lesions and two readers assessed diagnostic accuracy and calculated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM), and subjective image quality, the latter with a 5-point Likert scale.ResultsFifty patients (mean age: 70 ± 10 years, 23 men) were enrolled and 130 liver lesions (105 benign lesions, 25 metastases) were identified. DLIR_H achieved the highest SNR and CNR, comparable to ASiR-V 100% (p ≥ .051). DLIR_M returned the highest subjective image quality (score: 5; IQR: 4-5; p ≤ .001) and significant median increase (29%) in FOM (p < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm: 32/33 lesions were detected with DLIR_M and 26 lesions were detected with ASiR-V 50% (p = .031). Lesion accuracy of was 93.8% (95% CI: 88.1, 97.3; 122 of 130 lesions) for DLIR and 87.7% (95% CI: 80.8, 92.8; 114 of 130 lesions) for ASiR-V 50%.ConclusionsDLIR yields superior image quality and provides higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ASiR-V in the assessment of hypovascular liver lesions, in particular for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.Clinical relevance statementDeep learning image reconstruction algorithm demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to iterative reconstruction in the identification of hypovascular liver lesions, especially for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.Key points• Iterative reconstruction algorithm impacts image texture, with negative effects on diagnostic capabilities. • Medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction algorithm outperforms iterative reconstruction in the diagnostic accuracy of ≤ 0.5 cm hypovascular liver lesions (93.9% vs 78.8%), also granting higher objective and subjective image quality. • Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm can be safely implemented in routine abdominal CT protocols in place of iterative reconstruction.
| S-EPMC10957592 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEfforts to reduce the radiation dose have continued steadily, with new reconstruction techniques. Recently, image denoising algorithms using artificial neural networks, termed deep learning reconstruction (DLR), have been applied to CT image reconstruction to overcome the drawbacks of iterative reconstruction (IR). The purpose of our study was to compare the objective and subjective image quality of DLR and IR on pediatric abdomen and chest CT images.MethodsThis retrospective study included pediatric body CT images from February 2020 to October 2020, performed on 51 patients (34 boys and 17 girls; age 1-18 years). Non-contrast chest CT (n = 16), contrast-enhanced chest CT (n = 12), and contrast-enhanced abdomen CT (n = 23) images were included. Standard 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) images were compared to images with 100% ASIR-V and DLR at medium and high strengths. Attenuation, noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and signal to noise (SNR) measurements were performed. Overall image quality, artifacts, and noise were subjectively assessed by two radiologists using a four-point scale (superior, average, suboptimal, and unacceptable). A phantom scan was performed including the dose range of the clinical images used in our study, and the noise power spectrum (NPS) was calculated. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.ResultsDLR had better CNR and SNR than 50% ASIR-V in both pediatric chest and abdomen CT images. When compared with 50% ASIR-V, high strength DLR was associated with noise reduction in non-contrast chest CT (33.0%), contrast-enhanced chest CT (39.6%), and contrast-enhanced abdomen CT (38.7%) with increases in CNR at 149.1%, 105.8%, and 53.1% respectively. The subjective assessment of overall image quality and the noise was also better on DLR images (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in artifacts between reconstruction methods. From NPS analysis, DLR methods showed a pattern of reducing the magnitude of noise while maintaining the texture.ConclusionCompared with 50% ASIR-V, DLR improved pediatric body CT images with significant noise reduction. However, artifacts were not improved by DLR, regardless of strength.
| S-EPMC8503996 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm on the image quality in computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for pre-interventional planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).MethodsWe analyzed 50 consecutive patients (median age 80 years, 25 men) who underwent TAVI planning CT on a 256-dectector-row CT. Images were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) and DLIR. Intravascular image noise, edge sharpness, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified for ascending aorta, descending aorta, abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. Two readers (one radiologist and one interventional cardiologist) scored task-specific subjective image quality on a five-point scale.ResultsDLIR significantly reduced median image noise by 29-57% at all anatomical locations (all P<0.001). Accordingly, median SNR improved by 44-133% (all P<0.001) and median CNR improved by 44-125% (all P<0.001). DLIR significantly improved subjective image quality for all four pre-specified TAVI-specific tasks (measuring the annulus, assessing valve morphology and calcifications, the coronary ostia, and the suitability of the aorto-iliac access route) for both the radiologist and the interventional cardiologist (P≤0.001). Measurements of the aortic annulus circumference, area and diameter did not differ between ASIR-V and DLIR reconstructions (all P>0.05).ConclusionsDLIR significantly improves objective and subjective image quality in TAVI planning CT compared to a state-of-the-art iterative reconstruction without affecting measurements of the aortic annulus. This may provide an opportunity for further reductions in contrast medium volume in this population.
| S-EPMC9929406 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the image quality and lesion detectability of lower-dose CT (LDCT) of the abdomen and pelvis obtained using a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm compared with those of standard-dose CT (SDCT) images.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 123 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 63 ± 11 years; male:female, 70:53) who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic LDCT between May and August 2020 and had prior SDCT obtained using the same CT scanner within a year. LDCT images were reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (h-IR) and DLIR at medium and high strengths (DLIR-M and DLIR-H), while SDCT images were reconstructed with h-IR. For quantitative image quality analysis, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were measured in the liver, muscle, and aorta. Among the three different LDCT reconstruction algorithms, the one showing the smallest difference in quantitative parameters from those of SDCT images was selected for qualitative image quality analysis and lesion detectability evaluation. For qualitative analysis, overall image quality, image noise, image sharpness, image texture, and lesion conspicuity were graded using a 5-point scale by two radiologists. Observer performance in focal liver lesion detection was evaluated by comparing the jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic figures-of-merit (FOM).ResultsLDCT (35.1% dose reduction compared with SDCT) images obtained using DLIR-M showed similar quantitative measures to those of SDCT with h-IR images. All qualitative parameters of LDCT with DLIR-M images but image texture were similar to or significantly better than those of SDCT with h-IR images. The lesion detectability on LDCT with DLIR-M images was not significantly different from that of SDCT with h-IR images (reader-averaged FOM, 0.887 vs. 0.874, respectively; p = 0.581).ConclusionOverall image quality and detectability of focal liver lesions is preserved in contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic LDCT obtained with DLIR-M relative to those in SDCT with h-IR.
| S-EPMC8961013 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Objectives: Although reducing the radiation dose level is important during diagnostic computed tomography (CT) applications, effective image quality enhancement strategies are crucial to compensate for the degradation that is caused by a dose reduction. We performed this prospective study to quantify emphysema on ultra-low-dose CT images that were reconstructed using deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithms, and compared and evaluated the accuracies of DLIR algorithms versus standard-dose CT. Materials and Methods: A total of 32 patients were prospectively enrolled, and all underwent standard-dose and ultra-low-dose (120 kVp; CTDIvol < 0.7 mGy) chest CT scans at the same time in a single examination. A total of six image datasets (filtered back projection (FBP) for standard-dose CT, and FBP, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) 50%, DLIR-low, DLIR-medium, DLIR-high for ultra-low-dose CT) were reconstructed for each patient. Image noise values, emphysema indices, total lung volumes, and mean lung attenuations were measured in the six image datasets and compared (one-way repeated measures ANOVA). Results: The mean effective doses for standard-dose and ultra-low-dose CT scans were 3.43 ± 0.57 mSv and 0.39 ± 0.03 mSv, respectively (p < 0.001). The total lung volume and mean lung attenuation of five image datasets of ultra-low-dose CT scans, emphysema indices of ultra-low-dose CT scans reconstructed using ASIR-V 50 or DLIR-low, and the image noise of ultra-low-dose CT scans that were reconstructed using DLIR-low were not different from those of standard-dose CT scans. Conclusions: Ultra-low-dose CT images that were reconstructed using DLIR-low were found to be useful for emphysema quantification at a radiation dose of only 11% of that required for standard-dose CT.
| S-EPMC9317892 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11346658 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSparse-view CT image reconstruction problems encountered in dynamic CT acquisitions are technically challenging. Recently, many deep learning strategies have been proposed to reconstruct CT images from sparse-view angle acquisitions showing promising results. However, two fundamental problems with these deep learning reconstruction methods remain to be addressed: (1) limited reconstruction accuracy for individual patients and (2) limited generalizability for patient statistical cohorts.PurposeThe purpose of this work is to address the previously mentioned challenges in current deep learning methods.MethodsA method that combines a deep learning strategy with prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) was developed to address these two problems. In this method, the sparse-view CT data were reconstructed by the conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) method first, and then processed by the trained deep neural network to eliminate streaking artifacts. The outputs of the deep learning architecture were then used as the needed prior image in PICCS to reconstruct the image. If the noise level from the PICCS reconstruction is not satisfactory, another light duty deep neural network can then be used to reduce noise level. Both extensive numerical simulation data and human subject data have been used to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the performance of the proposed DL-PICCS method in terms of reconstruction accuracy and generalizability.ResultsExtensive evaluation studies have demonstrated that: (1) quantitative reconstruction accuracy of DL-PICCS for individual patient is improved when it is compared with the deep learning methods and CS-based methods; (2) the false-positive lesion-like structures and false negative missing anatomical structures in the deep learning approaches can be effectively eliminated in the DL-PICCS reconstructed images; and (3) DL-PICCS enables a deep learning scheme to relax its working conditions to enhance its generalizability.ConclusionsDL-PICCS offers a promising opportunity to achieve personalized reconstruction with improved reconstruction accuracy and enhanced generalizability.
| S-EPMC9580024 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo compare the dose reduction potential (DRP) of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI) with that of a vendor-specific deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm (DLR, TrueFidelity™).MethodsComputed tomography (CT) images of a multi-sized image quality phantom (Mercury v4.0) were acquired under six radiation dose levels (0.48/0.97/1.93/3.87/7.74/15.47 mGy) and were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three strength levels of the DLR (low/medium/high). The FBP images were denoised using the DLM. For all DLM and DLR images, the detectability index (d') (a task-based detection performance metric) was obtained, under various combinations of three target sizes (10/5/1 mm), five inlets (CT value difference with the background; -895/50/90/335/1000 HU), five phantom diameters (36/31/26/21/16 cm), and six radiation dose levels. Dose reduction potential (DRP) measures the dose reduction made by using DLM or DLR, while yielding d' equivalent to that of FBP at full dose.ResultsThe DRPs of the DLM, DLR-low, DLR-medium, and DLR-high were 86% (81-88%), 60% (46-67%), 76% (60-81%), and 87% (78-92%), respectively. For 10-mm targets, the DRP of the DLM (87%) was higher than that of all DLR algorithms (58-86%). However, for smaller targets (5 mm/1 mm), the DRPs of the DLR-high (89/88%) were greater than those of the DLM (87/84%).ConclusionThe dose reduction potential of the vendor-agnostic DLM was shown to be comparable to that of the vendor-specific DLR at high strength and superior to those of the DLRs at medium and low strengths.Key points• DRP of the vendor-agnostic model was comparable to that of high-strength vendor-specific model and superior to those of medium- and low-strength models. • Under various radiation dose levels, the deep learning model shows higher detectability indexes compared to FBP.
| S-EPMC8364308 | biostudies-literature