Dataset Information

Outcomes and future directions for neuroimmunology/multiple sclerosis fellowship training: Survey of recent trainees.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Neuroimmunology/multiple sclerosis is a rapidly evolving, but still poorly defined subspecialty. Fellowship training is not standardized, and there is substantial variability across sites. Outcomes of fellowship training have not yet been studied. We therefore examined early career choices of neuroimmunology/MS fellowship program graduates and solicited the perspective of current and recent trainees on their fellowship experience as well as opportunities to improve neuroimmunology education.

Methods

We developed a questionnaire to collect information about fellowship training experiences and current medical practice. We identified recent graduates based on records from US training programs and the National MS Society and electronically sent the survey to current trainees and recent graduates (within the last 5 years).

Results

We identified 179 current/recent trainees and successfully reached 157 with survey distributions. Ninety-five individuals (60.5%) returned surveys. Most graduates assumed an academic practice (68%) focused mostly or exclusively on MS and other CNS neuroimmune diseases (55%), and practiced in regions where there were ≥5 other neuroimmunology specialists (51%). Graduates felt well-prepared to manage diagnoses of MS and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders but their comfort with rarer CNS neuroimmune diseases varied substantially. Basic immunology, neuro-rheumatology, grant writing and neuro-rehabilitation were identified as high impact areas for cross-disciplinary didactic training. The majority of recent trainees (57%) favored standardizing a core neuroimmunology curriculum, and 48% favored developing a subspecialty certification.

Conclusions

This is the first study to examine practice outcomes and trainee experiences for neuroimmunology training programs. We anticipate that these data will help educators define a core curriculum for the subspecialty and identify complementary skill sets that enhance the traditional clinic-based model of teaching.

SUBMITTER: Hua LH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8023409 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Whether graduating pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellows feel adequately trained in interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains unknown. In addition, there are no published data describing the current approach to educating trainees about ILD. Objective: To characterize the present state of ILD training during fellowship and to determine graduating PCCM fellows' perceived abilities to diagnose and manage ILD. Methods: We surveyed PCCM fellowship program directors nationwide and compared their perceptions of graduating fellows' abilities to diagnose, provide initial management to, and offer longitudinal care to patients with ILD using a series of unpaired t tests. We also inquired about existing practices for educating fellows about ILD. We then surveyed graduating PCCM fellows from 19 different preselected programs to assess comfort level with ILD in comparison with other core clinical domains. Results: Program director respondents (n = 74, 40% response rate) rated graduating fellows' abilities to establish specific ILD diagnoses and to provide initial management similarly (4.3 ± 0.8 on five-point Likert scale), whereas the ability to provide longitudinal expert care was rated significantly lower (3.8 ± 0.9, P = 0.001). Most respondents (n = 52, 70.3%) reported having dedicated outpatient ILD specialists with whom fellows could rotate, but only half required this rotation. In addition, very few (n = 17, 23.0%) reported that a majority of patients with suspected or newly diagnosed ILD were scheduled in fellow clinics, many of whom received subsequent longitudinal care from dedicated ILD specialists. Among 71 third-year fellow respondents, confidence in managing ILD was rated poorly (3.2 ± 1.0 on a five-point Likert scale) in contrast to more common diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.4 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and asthma (4.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Trainee exposure to ILD in both clinical and educational settings varied across PCCM fellowships nationwide. Fellows nearing graduation were significantly less confident in their ability to manage ILD compared with other more common pulmonary diseases.