A Robust Oxygen Microbubble Radiosensitizer for Iodine-125 Brachytherapy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Peng S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8025033 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose:To investigate chronological changes in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients who received iodine-125 brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer. Methods:We enrolled 706 patients who received BT. Of these, 265 (38%) received BT combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). An International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QOL) score, and overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) were recorded before BT (baseline, BL), and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60?months after BT. The sum of frequency (2), urgency (4) and nocturia (7) of the IPSS questionnaire was defined as the storage symptoms score, whereas the sum of emptying (1), intermittency (3), weak stream (5), and hesitancy (6) was defined as the voiding symptom score. Results:Total IPSS significantly increased at 3?months following BT compared with BL (mean score: 17.1 vs. 7.99, P?<?0.001) and returned to BL by 36?months. The storage symptom score did not return to BL 36?months after BT. Total OABSS significantly increased 3?months after BT compared with BL (mean score: 6.52 vs. 3.45, P?<?0.001), and returned to BL 48?months after BT. The IPSS-QOL score was the highest score (mean score: 2.46 vs. 3.9, P?<?0.001) 3?months after BT and returned to BL 48?months after BT, however the IPSS-QOL score was lower than BL (mean score: 2.01 vs 2.46, P?<?0.001) at 60?months. The risk factors for LUTS within 1?year after BT were BL IPSS (P?<?0.001) and PV (P?<?0.001). Patients who received combined EBRT experienced transient storage symptoms 24 and 36?months after BT, whereas those who received BT alone did not. However, the storage symptom score of the patients who received combined EBRT was improving 48?months after BT and eventually showed no significant difference compared with those treated with BT alone. Conclusion:Three months after BT, LUTS, including storage symptoms, deteriorated the most but improved with time. The urinary symptom in patients who received combined EBRT can potentially flare again in 24 and 36?months after BT. Knowledge of changes in LUTS associated with BT may influence treatment recommendations and enable patients to make better-informed decisions.
| S-EPMC6282112 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTumor recurrence is a major problem after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current study evaluated the effects of adjuvant iodine-125 ((125)I) brachytherapy on postoperative recurrence of HCC.Methodology/principal findingsFrom July 2000 to June 2004, 68 HCC patients undergoing curative hepatectomy were randomly assigned into a (125)I adjuvant brachytherapy group (n?=?34) and a group of best care (n?=?34). Patients in the (125)I adjuvant brachytherapy group received (125)I seed implantation on the raw surface of resection. Patients in the best care control group received identical treatments except for the (125)I seed implantation. Time to recurrence (TTR) and 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. The follow-up ended in January 2010, and lasted for 7.7-106.4 months with a median of 47.6 months. TTR was significantly longer in the (125)I group (mean of 60.0 months vs. 36.7 months in the control). The 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free rates of the (125)I group were 94.12%, 76.42%, and 73.65% vs. 88.24%, 50.00%, and 29.41% compared with the control group, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of the (125)I group were 94.12%, 73.53%, and 55.88% vs. 88.24%, 52.94%, and 29.41% compared with the control group, respectively. The (125)I brachytherapy decreased the risk of recurrence (HR?=?0.310) and the risk of death (HR?=?0.364). Most frequent adverse events in the (125)I group included nausea, vomiting, arrhythmia, decreased white blood cell and/or platelet counts, and were generally mild and manageable.Conclusions/significanceAdjuvant (125)I brachytherapy significantly prolonged TTR and increased the OS rate after curative resection of HCC.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000081011.
| S-EPMC3585398 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe evaluated the long-term outcome in patients harboring intracranial ependymomas treated with interstitial brachytherapy (IBT).MethodsTwenty-one patients (M/F = 9/12; median age: 29 years; range: 8-70 years), diagnosed with intracranial ependymoma (1 WHO I, 11 WHO II, 9 WHO III) were treated with IBT using stereotactically implanted (125)Iodine seeds between 1987 and 2010, either primarily, as adjuvant therapy following incomplete resection, or as salvage treatment upon tumor recurrence. Sixteen of 21 patients underwent microsurgical resection prior to IBT; in 5 patients, IBT was performed primarily after stereotactic biopsy for histological diagnosis. The cumulative tumor surface dose ranged from 50-65 Gy treating a median tumor volume of 3.6 ml (range, 0.3-11.6 ml). A median follow-up period of 105.3 months (range, 12.7-286.2 months) was evaluated.ResultsActuarial 2-, 5- and 10-years overall- and disease-specific survival rates after IBT were each 90% and 100% at all times for ependymomas WHO I/II, for anaplastic ependymomas WHO III 100%, 100%, 70% and 100%, 100%, 86%, respectively. The neurological status of seven patients improved, while there was no change in 12 and deterioration in 2 patients, respectively. Follow-up MR images disclosed a complete tumor remission in 3, a partial remission in 12 and a stable disease in 6 patients. Treatment-associated morbidity only occurred in a single patient.ConclusionsThis study shows that stereotactic IBT for intracranial ependymomas is safe and can provide a high degree of local tumor control. Due to the low rate of side effects, IBT may evolve into an attractive alternative to microsurgery in ependymomas located in eloquent areas or as a salvage treatment.
| S-EPMC3489891 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere is currently no widely-accepted consensus for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous brachytherapy with iodine-125 seeds for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein-branch tumor thrombus (PVBTT).MethodsSixty-nine hepatocellular carcinoma patients with PVBTT were enrolled; 34 received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with iodine-125 seeds implanted in the PVBTT; 35 were treated with TACE alone. Adverse events, objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were compared between the two groups. Tumor responses of PVBTT and intrahepatic tumor were correlated. Multivariate and subgroup analyses were conducted for overall survival.ResultsNo grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded, and there was no difference in grade 1 or 2 adverse events between the two groups. Objective response rate and disease control rate for PVBTT were 58.9 and 91.2%, respectively, in the combined treatment group, which were significantly greater than the 5.7 and 54.3% rates, respectively, in the TACE-alone group (both p's ≤ 0.001). Intrahepatic tumor response was positively correlated with the PVBTT response (γ = 0.782, p < 0.01). Survival outcomes were better in the combined treatment group than in the TACE-alone group: the median progression-free survival for PVBTT was 9 months versus 3 months (HR = 0.187 [95% CI: 0.101, 0.345], p < 0.001), and the median overall survival was 11 months versus 7 months (HR = 0.448 [95% CI: 0.265, 0.758], p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that application of brachytherapy and lower grade PVBTT (Vp1 + Vp2 vs. Vp3) were protective predictors of overall survival. In stratified analysis, the benefit of overall survival was more significant in the subgroup of PVBTT Vp1 + Vp2 rather than in Vp3.ConclusionsThe combination of iodine-125 seed brachytherapy guided by ultrasound and TACE is a convenient, safe, and effective treatment for patients with HCC and PVBTT, conferring a better survival benefit than TACE alone.
| S-EPMC8439081 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionIodine-125 brachytherapy is an effective eye-sparing treatment for uveal melanoma. Previous work has shown that uveal melanomas cluster into distinct molecular classes based on gene expression profiles - discriminating low-grade from high-grade tumors. Our objective was to identify clinical and molecular predictors of local recurrence (LR) and progression-free survival (PFS).MethodsWe constructed a retrospective database of uveal melanoma patients from the University of Miami's electronic medical records that were treated between January 8, 2012, and January 5, 2019, with either COMS-style or Eye Physics plaque. Data on tumor characteristics, pretreatment retinal complications, post-plaque treatments, LR, and PFS were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox models for cumulative incidence of LR and PFS were conducted using SAS version 9.4.ResultsWe identified 262 patients, with a median follow-up time of 33.5 months. Nineteen patients (7.3%) had LR, and 56 patients (21.4%) were classified as PFS. We found that ocular melanocytosis (hazard ratio = 5.55, p < 0.001) had the greatest impact on PFS. Genetic expression profile did not predict LR outcomes (hazard ratio = 0.51, p = 0.297).ConclusionThese findings help physicians identify predictors for short-term brachytherapy outcomes, allowing better shared decision making with patients preoperatively when deciding between brachytherapy versus enucleation. Patients stratified to higher risk groups based on preoperative characteristics such as ocular melanocytosis should be monitored more closely. Future studies must validate these findings using a prospective cohort study.
| S-EPMC10329746 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy (TKI-I) versus TKI alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).MethodsData of patients with TACE-refractory HCC who received TKI (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or TKI-I from September 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to diminish potential bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Tumor responses and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 132 patients were included in this study. Under PSM, 48 paired patients were selected for comparison. The median OS was 23.2 (95% CI 20.9-25.1) months in the TKI-I group versus 13.9 (95% CI 11.1-16.7) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). The median TTP was 12.8 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) months in the TKI-I group versus 5.8 (95% CI 5.0-6.6) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). Patients in the TKI-I group had higher objective response rate (68.8% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.001) and disease control rate (89.6% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.007) than those in the TKI group. The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the TKI-I group were comparable to those in the TKI group (any grade, 89.7% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.620; ≥grade 3, 33.8% vs. 32.8%, P = 0.902).ConclusionsTKI-I was safe and significantly improved survival over TKI alone in HCC patients with TACE refractoriness.
| S-EPMC10518921 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study aimed to assess the dosimetric differences between iodine-125 seed stereotactic brachytherapy (SBT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An SBT plan and an SBRT plan were generated for eleven patients with T1-2 NSCLC. Prescription of the dose and fractionation (fr) for SBRT was 48Gy/4fr. The planning aim for SBT was D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the target volume)≥120Gy. Student's paired t test was used to compare the dosimetric parameters. The SBT and SBRT plans had comparable PTV D90 (104.73±2.10Gyvs.107.64±2.29Gy), and similar mean volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100%) (91.65% vs.92.44%, p = 0.410). The mean volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose (V150%) for SBT was 64.71%, whereas it was 0% for SBRT. Mean heterogeneity index (HI) deviation for SBT vs. SBRT was 0.73 vs. 0.19 (p<0.0001), and the mean conformity index (CI) for SBT vs. SBRT was 0.77 vs. 0.81 (p = 0.031). The mean lung doses (MLD) in SBT were significantly lower than those in SBRT (1.952±0.713 vs. 5.618±2.009, p<0.0001). In conclusion, compared with SBRT, SBT can generate a comparable dose within PTV, while the organs at risk (OARs) only receive a very low dose. But the HI and CI in SBT were lower than in SBRT.
| S-EPMC5679513 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To analyze efficacy, functional outcome, and treatment toxicity of low-dose rate I-125 brachytherapy (SBT) alone or in combination with best safe resection (in case of larger tumor volumes) as first-line treatment for pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs) not suitable for complete resection. Consecutively treated (2000-2014) complex located circumscribed WHO grade I/II PLGGs were included. For small tumors (≤4 cm in diameter) SBT alone was performed; for larger tumors best safe resection and subsequent SBT was chosen. Temporary Iodine-125 seeds were used (median reference dose: 54 Gy). Treatment response was estimated with the modified MacDonald criteria. Analysis of functional outcome included ophthalmological, endocrinological and neurological evaluation. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were obtained from proportional hazards models. Toxicity was categorized according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Fifty-eight patients were included treated either with SBT alone (n = 39) or with SBT plus microsurgery (n = 19). Five-year progression-free survival was 87%. Two patients had died due to tumor progression. Among survivors, improvement/stabilization/deterioration of functional deficits was seen in 20/14/5 patients, respectively. Complete/partial response had beneficial impact on functional scores (P = 0.02). The 5-year estimated risk to receive adjuvant radiotherapy/chemotherapy was 5.2%. The overall early (delayed) toxicity rate was 8.6% (10.3%), respectively. No permanent morbidity occurred. In complex located PLGGs, early SBT alone or combined with best safe resection preserves/improves functional scores and results in tumor control rates usually achieved with complete resection. Long-term analysis is necessary for confirmation of these results.
| S-EPMC4799958 | biostudies-other
Project description:Background:A proportion of patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have poor survival, and currently no standard treatment is available, which poses a great challenge to physicians. This study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of brachytherapy with iodine-125 seeds and systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone for synchronous extracranial oligometastatic NSCLC. Materials and Methods:After a systematic retrospective review of the case database between 1st Mar 2014 and 30th Mar 2018, data were obtained on 69 NSCLC patients with extracranial oligometastatic NSCLC. Among them, 32 patients received brachytherapy with iodine-125 seeds combined with systemic chemotherapy (group A), and the remaining 37 patients received chemotherapy alone (group B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and complications. Results:The demographic and clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the groups (all p>0.05). The overall 3-month ORR was significantly higher in group A (65.6% vs 37.8%, p=0.030) than in group B. With a median follow-up time of 23 months, the PFS and OS were 11.6 (95% CI: 7.0-16.2) months vs 6.3 (95% CI: 3.4-9.2) months (p=0.036) and 17.6 (95% CI: 13.9-21.3) months vs 11.2 (95% CI: 7.7-14.7) months (p=0.042) in groups A and B, respectively. Furthermore, in Cox regression analysis, local brachytherapy was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS (HR=0.416, 95% CI: 0.246-0.702, p=0.001) and OS (HR=0.375, 95% CI: 0.216-0.653, p=0.001). Severe complications were not observed in either of the groups. Conclusion:The combination of brachytherapy with iodine-125 seeds and systemic chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone for synchronous extracranial oligometastatic NSCLC.
| S-EPMC7494957 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRadiation therapy is the method of choice for subjects with inoperable salivary gland malignancies. I-125 brachytherapy, delivering a high radiation dose to a tumor but sparing surrounding normal tissues, is supposed to be ideal modality for the treatment of salivary gland malignancies. We designed a randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy of I-125 permanent brachytherapy (PBT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for inoperable salivary gland malignancies.Methods/designIn this study, inclusion criteria are subjects with inoperable salivary gland malignancies, aged 18-80 years, have provided informed consent, with at least one measurable tumor focus, be able to survive ≥3 months, Karnofsky performance status ≥60, have adequate hematopoietic function of bone marrow, have normal liver and kidney function, and are willing to prevent pregnancy. Exclusion criteria include a history of radiation or chemotherapy, a history of other malignant tumors in the past 5 years, receiving other effective treatments, participating in other clinical trials, with circulatory metastasis, cognitive impairment, severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, acute infection, uncontrolled systemic disease, history of interstitial lungdisease, and being pregnant or breast feeding. The study will be conducted as a clinical, prospective, randomised controlled trial with balanced randomisation (1:1). The planned sample size is 90 subjects. Subjects with inoperable salivary gland malignancies are randomised to receive either I-125 PBT or IMRT, with stratification by tumor size and neck lymph node metastasis. Participants in both groups will be followed up at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months after randomization. The primary outcome is local control rate of the primary site (based on imaging findings and clinical examination, RECIST criteria) in 1 year. Secondary outcomes are progression-free survival, overall survival, quality of life (QOL) measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) of Chinese version, and safety of treatment. Chi-squared test is used to compare the local control rates in both groups. The survival curves are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test is used to test the significant difference.DiscussionOnly few observational studies have investigated the effect of I-125 PBT on inoperable salivary gland malignancies. To our knowledge, this is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of I-125 PBT for subjects with inoperable salivary gland malignancies, and will add to the knowledge base for the treatment of these subjects.Trial registrationThe study is registered to Clinical Trials.gov ( NCT02048254 ) on Jan 29, 2014.
| S-EPMC4782516 | biostudies-literature