Dataset Information

The association between systolic blood pressure reduction during clonidine suppression testing and the decrease in plasma catecholamines and metanephrines.

ABSTRACT: Borderline isolated norepinephrine (NE) and normetanephrine (NMT) elevation is common among patients with suspected pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). The clonidine suppression test (CST) may help establish the etiology in these cases. Prolonged laboratory processing and/or paucity of reliable biochemical assays may limit the utility of CST. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether blood pressure (BP) reduction during CST is associated with alterations in plasma NMT/NE, thereby potentially providing an immediate indication of CST results. In this cross-sectional study, the authors included all consecutive patients with suspected PPGL who underwent CST from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019. Linear regression models were conducted to evaluate the association between BP reduction and decrease in plasma NMT/NE. The final analysis included 36 patients (17 males). The decrease in systolic BP (SBP) 90 minutes postclonidine was associated with a decrease in plasma NMT (R = 0.668, P = .025) and NE (R = 0.562, P = .005). A 40% decrease in NMT and NE correlated with a 9.74% and 7.16% decrease in SBP, respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the association between SBP reduction and the decrease in plasma NMT (R = 0.764, P = .046) and NE (R = 0.714, P = .003) strengthens among patients with hypertension and among those with diabetes mellitus (R = 0.974, P = .026 for NMT). In conclusion, SBP reduction during CST is associated with plasma NMT and NE decrease. Therefore, the decrease in SBP 90 minutes postclonidine may serve as an immediate complementary clinical tool for PPGL diagnosis.

SUBMITTER: Golani T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8029920 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe measurement of catecholamines and their metabolites in either urine or plasma is an important diagnostic test used to exclude the presence of neuroendocrine tumours. Because of weak chromatographic retention and potential ion-suppression, reverse-phase LC-MSMS is not ideal for analysis of these polar molecules. Here, we investigate derivatisation by ethylation as an alternative approach.MethodsA simple and rapid method involving acetaldehyde and a reducing agent was used to convert urine free metanephrines and catecholamines, and their deuterated analogues as internal standards, to mono-ethyl or diethyl- derivatives. Using an Agilent 6460 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer, precursor and product ion mass spectra were recorded to allow comparison of multiple reaction monitoring methods for both derivatised and non-derivatised analytes under reverse-phase LC-MSMS conditions with positive electrospray ionization.ResultsConversion of biogenic amines to less polar ethyl derivatives increased their mass and enhanced the intensity of their molecular ions and fragments. Ethylation also improved the chromatographic properties of the amines, with greater retention and elution from reverse-phase HPLC columns with a methanol or acetonitrile gradient. The signal response of tandem mass spectrometric detection was increased up to 50-fold for ethyl metanephrines compared to non-derivatised compounds. This increase allowed for the omission of solid-phase extraction of urine as a clean-up step prior to analysis. The 'dilute-derivatise-shoot' method maintained analytical performance with respect to between-run imprecision (CV < 6%) and accuracy in an external quality assurance program. Gender-related ranges for free metanephrines in early-morning spot urines, collected from adult patients, were similar using either derivatised or non-derivatised samples.ConclusionsThe LC-MSMS detection of free urine biogenic amines can be greatly enhanced by ethyl derivatisation, which is easy and rapid to perform. Advantages include improved chromatography and lower limits of quantitation, that negate the requirement for solid-phase clean-up of urine prior to analysis. A disadvantage is the potential toxicity of the derivatising agents used if they are not handled appropriately.

Project description:ImportanceThe safety and efficacy of intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who present with systolic blood pressure greater than 220 mm Hg appears to be unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the differential outcomes of intensive (goal, 110-139 mm Hg) vs standard (goal, 140-179 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure reduction in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and initial systolic blood pressure of 220 mm Hg or more vs less than 220 mm Hg.Design, setting, and participantsThis post hoc analysis of the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage-II trial was performed in November 2019 on data from the multicenter randomized clinical trial, which was conducted between May 2011 to September 2015. Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and initial systolic blood pressure of 180 mm Hg or more, randomized within 4.5 hours after symptom onset, were included.InterventionsIntravenous nicardipine infusion titrated to goals.Main outcomes and measuresNeurological deterioration and hematoma expansion within 24 hours and death or severe disability at 90 days, plus kidney adverse events and serious adverse events until day 7 or hospital discharge.ResultsA total of 8532 patients were screened, and 999 individuals (mean [SD] age, 62.0 [13.1] years; 620 men [62.0%]) underwent randomization and had an initial SBP value. Among 228 participants with initial systolic blood pressures of 220 mm Hg or more, the rate of neurological deterioration within 24 hours was higher in those who underwent intensive (vs standard) systolic blood pressure reduction (15.5% vs 6.8%; relative risk, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.03-5.07]; P = .04). The rate of death and severe disability (39.0% vs 38.4%; relative risk, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.73-1.78]; P = .92) was not significantly different between the 2 groups. There was a significantly higher rate of kidney adverse events in participants randomized to intensive systolic blood pressure reduction (13.6% vs 4.2%; relative risk, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.21-8.56]; P = .01), but no difference was observed in the rate of kidney serious adverse events.Conclusions and relevanceThe higher rate of neurological deterioration within 24 hours associated with intensive treatment in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and initial systolic blood pressure of 220 mm Hg or more, without any benefit in reducing hematoma expansion at 24 hours or death or severe disability at 90 days, warrants caution against generalization of recommendations for intensive systolic blood pressure reduction.

Dataset Information

The association between systolic blood pressure reduction during clonidine suppression testing and the decrease in plasma catecholamines and metanephrines.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets