Dataset Information

Doppler parameters of renal hemodynamics in women with preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: The present meta-analysis aims to compare renal arterial and venous Doppler parameters in women with preeclampsia and healthy pregnant controls. Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from inception to December 04, 2019. All observational studies reporting renal resistive index, pulsatility index, renal interlobar vein impedance, or pulse transit time among preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women were held eligible. Subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of disease onset and side of measurement. Both pair-wise and network meta-analysis were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and R-3.4.3 software. Fourteen studies were included, with a total of 1118 women. No difference of renal resistive (MD: 0.00, 95% CI: [-0.03, 0.04]) and pulsatility index (MD: -0.01, 95% CI: [-0.14, 0.12]) was evident between the two groups. Renal interlobar vein impedance was estimated to be significantly higher in preeclampsia (MD: 0.07, 95% CI: [0.06, 0.09]), while venous pulse transit time was significantly lower (MD: -0.10, 95% CI: [-0.14, -0.05]) in women with the disease. Subgroup analysis indicated that early-onset preeclampsia was associated with significantly elevated renal interlobar vein impedance and lower venous pulse transit time than late-onset disease. The outcomes of the present meta-analysis suggest that preeclampsia is characterized by venous hemodynamic dysfunction as it is associated with significantly elevated renal interlobar vein impedance and shorter venous pulse transit time. Future large-scale prospective studies should introduce cutoff values and determine the optimal timing of measurement in order to achieve optimal predictive accuracy.

SUBMITTER: Bellos I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8030017 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPreeclampsia is a serious pregnancy-related disease which may lead to adverse health effects to the mother and fetus. Besides many publications on the association of red cell distribution width (RDW) and preeclampsia, there has been no published meta-analysis. This necessitated the present systemic review and met-analysis to assess the RDW in relation to preeclampsia.MethodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed. Relevant published studies were searched in PubMed, Cochrane library, Google scholar, Scopus, Embase and CINAHL using the term "Preeclampsia OR eclampsia AND red cell distribution width OR red blood cells). Modified Newcastle - Ottawa quality assessment scale was used for critical appraisal of retrieved studies. Pooled Meta logistic regression was computed using OpenMeta Analyst software. Subgroup and meta-regression methods were performed to analyse the heterogeneity.ResultsEleven case control studies were included in the met-analyses with a total of 951 cases (preeclampsia) and 2024 controls. The mean (SD) of the RDW level was significantly higher in women with preeclampsia compared to controls [15.10 (2.48) % vs. 14.26(1.71) %, P?<?0.001]. The mean difference was 0.85, 95% CI?=?0.26-1.43. Due to a high heterogeneity (I2 =?90.45, P?<?0.001), the continuous random effect model was used.Eight studies compared RDW level in the mild (N?=?360) with severe cases (N?=?354) of preeclampsia. The RDW level was significantly higher in women with severe preeclampsia compared to those with mild preeclampsia [15.37 (2.48) % vs. 14.037(1.79) %, P?<?0.001]. The mean difference was 1.07, 95% CI?=?0.45-1.70. Since there is a high heterogeneity [I2 =?76.67, P?<?0.001], the continuous random effect model was used.Through the met-regression model, except for the region of the study (P?<?0.001), none of investigated variables (age, parity, quality of the study) was significantly associated with the investigated heterogeneity. The outliers (3studies) were removed to reduce the heterogeneity. The pooled meta-analysis of the remaining 8 studies showed a significant difference in the RDW between preeclamptic women compared with the controls. The mean difference was 0.93, 95% CI?=?0.56-1.31, P?<?0.001. Because of heterogeneity [I2 =?69.6, P?=?0.002], the continuous random effect model was used.ConclusionRDW level was significantly higher in women with preeclampsia compared to controls. Similarly, women with severe preeclampsia had significantly higher RDW than those with the mild form.

Project description:BackgroundPreeclampsia remains a significant danger to both mother and child and current prevention and treatment management strategies are limited. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the current literature on evidence for the use of the regenerative capacity of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy, the anticoagulant activity of antithrombin (AT), or the free radical scavenging activity of alpha-1-microglobulin (A1M) as potential novel treatments for severe preeclampsia and Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelet count (HELLP).MethodWe conducted a systematic review of potential biological therapies for preeclampsia. We screened MEDLINE and Embase from inception through May 2017 for studies using AT, A1M or MSCs as potential treatments for preeclampsia and/or HELLP. A meta-analysis was performed to pool data from randomized control trials (RCTs) with homogenous outcomes using the inverse variance method. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs, and SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies were used to investigate potential bias of studies.ResultsThe literature search retrieved a total of 1015 articles, however, only 17 studies met the selection criteria: AT (n = 9, 8 human and 1 animal); A1M (n = 4, 3 animal and 1 ex-vivo); and, MSCs (n = 4, 3 animal and 1 ex-vivo). A meta-analysis of AT therapy versus placebo and a meta-analysis for AT therapy with heparin versus heparin alone did not show significant differences between study groups. Animal and ex-vivo studies demonstrated significant benefits in relevant outcomes for A1M and MSCs versus control treatments. Most RCT studies were rated as having a low risk of bias across categories with some studies showing an unclear risk of bias in some categories. The two cohort studies both received a total of four out of nine stars (a rating of "poor" quality). Most animal studies had an unclear risk of bias across most categories, with some studies having a low risk of bias in some categories.ConclusionsThe findings of this review are strengthened by rigorous systematic search and review of the literature. Results of our meta-analyses do not currently warrant further exploration of AT as a treatment of preeclampsia in human trials. Results of animal and ex-vivo studies of A1M and MSCs were encouraging and supportive of initiating human investigations.

Dataset Information

Doppler parameters of renal hemodynamics in women with preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets