Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone vs olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide in chronic kidney disease.


ABSTRACT: An open-label, long-term study evaluated safety and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone (AZL-M/CLD) vs olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (OLM/HCTZ) in hypertensive participants with stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Initial therapy was AZL-M/CLD 20/12.5 mg (n = 77) or OLM/HCTZ 20/12.5 mg (n = 76), but could be up-titrated (AZL-M/CLD to 40/25 mg; OLM/HCTZ to 40/25 mg [US] or 20/25 mg [Europe]) with other agents added during weeks 4-52. Primary endpoint was proportion of participants with ≥ 1 adverse event (AE) through week 52. Baseline demographics were similar. AEs did not differ between groups (88.3%, AZL-M/CLD vs 76.3%, OLM/HCTZ; P = .058). AZL-M/CLD showed greater systolic BP reductions after initial dosing (P = .037) but not during long-term follow-up (P = .588). A greater proportion of participants up-titrated to the highest dose with OLM/HCTZ (48.7%) vs AZL-M/CLD (29.9%) (P = .021) and were taking additional antihypertensive medications (26.3% vs 16.9%). Both AZL-M/CLD and OLM/HCTZ showed similar efficacy and tolerability.

SUBMITTER: Bakris GL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8031057 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8031288 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5862000 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5024056 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6122257 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8108825 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4819539 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2963900 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8673073 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3546644 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8030929 | biostudies-literature