Dataset Information

Distinct prognostic values of programmed death-ligand 1 and programmed cell death protein 1 in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although immunotherapy has demonstrated similar clinical activities in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), several studies have shown programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) to have different predictive roles in ADC and SCC. This study was conducted to compare the different functions of PD-L1/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway in these malignancies.

Methods

A multi-dimensional analysis based on public databases and 2 independent cohorts including 262 patients with lung cancer was performed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence-based multiplexed staining were used to detect the immune factors.

Results

PD-L1 was observed to have different expressions and regulatory mechanisms between SCC and ADC. PD-L1 was significantly increased from the messenger RNA (mRNA) to protein levels in the SCC group compared with the ADC group. Also, PD-L1 on tumor cells (TCs) was positively correlated with CD8+ tumor lymphocyte infiltrates in ADC, but not in SCC. More importantly, PD-L1 was considered to be an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) for ADC patients. In contrast, in SCC patients, PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were considered a poor prognostic predictor.

Conclusions

These findings showed that PD-L1 in ADC and PD-1+ TILs in SCC respectively indicates T-cell function, which plays a crucial role in determining prognosis. The distinct functions of the biomarkers between ADC and SCC might provide potential avenues for guiding anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

SUBMITTER: Wang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8033326 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe prognostic value of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in gynecological cancers has been explored previously, but the conclusion remains controversial due to limited evidence. This study aimed to conduct an updated meta-analysis to re-investigate the predictive significance of PD-L1 expression.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The associations between PD-L1 expression status and prognosis [overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) or disease-free survival (DFS)], clinical parameters [FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis (LNM), tumor size, infiltration depth, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) or grade] and response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment [objective response rate (ORR)] were analyzed by hazard ratios (HR) or relative risks (RR).ResultsFifty-five studies were enrolled. Overall, high PD-L1 expression was not significantly associated with OS, PFS, RFS, CSS and DFS of gynecological cancers. However, subgroup analysis of studies with reported HR (HR = 1.27) and a cut-off value of 5% (HR = 2.10) suggested that high PD-L1 expression was correlated with a shorter OS of gynecological cancer patients. Further sub-subgroup analysis revealed that high PD-L1 expressed on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs) predicted a favorable OS for ovarian (HR = 0.72), but a poor OS for cervical cancer (HR = 3.44). PD-L1 overexpression was also correlated with a lower OS rate in non-Asian endometrial cancer (HR = 1.60). High level of PD-L1 was only clinically correlated with a shorter PFS in Asian endometrial cancer (HR = 1.59). Furthermore, PD-L1-positivity was correlated with LNM (for overall, ovarian and endometrial cancer expressed on tumor cells), advanced FIGO stage (for overall, ovarian cancer expressed on tumor cells, endometrial cancer expressed on tumor cells and TICs), LVSI (for overall and endometrial cancer expressed on tumor cells and TICs), and increasing infiltration depth/high grade (only for endometrial cancer expressed on TICs). Patients with PD-L1-positivity may obtain more benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment than the negative group, showing a higher ORR (RR = 1.98), longer OS (HR = 0.34) and PFS (HR = 0.61).ConclusionOur findings suggest high PD-L1 expression may be a suitable biomarker for predicting the clinical outcomes in patients with gynecological cancers.