Dataset Information

PC2P: Parameter-free network-based prediction of protein complexes.

ABSTRACT:

Motivation

Prediction of protein complexes from protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks is an important problem in systems biology, as they control different cellular functions. The existing solutions employ algorithms for network community detection that identify dense subgraphs in PPI networks. However, gold standards in yeast and human indicate that protein complexes can also induce sparse subgraphs, introducing further challenges in protein complex prediction.

Results

To address this issue, we formalize protein complexes as biclique spanned subgraphs, which include both sparse and dense subgraphs. We then cast the problem of protein complex prediction as a network partitioning into biclique spanned subgraphs with removal of minimum number of edges, called coherent partition. Since finding a coherent partition is a computationally intractable problem, we devise a parameter-free greedy approximation algorithm, termed Protein Complexes from Coherent Partition (PC2P), based on key properties of biclique spanned subgraphs. Through comparison with nine contenders, we demonstrate that PC2P: (1) successfully identifies modular structure in networks, as a prerequisite for protein complex prediction, (2) outperforms the existing solutions with respect to a composite score of five performance measures on 75% and 100% of the analyzed PPI networks and gold standards in yeast and human, respectively, and (3,4) does not compromise GO semantic similarity and enrichment score of the predicted protein complexes. Therefore, our study demonstrates that clustering of networks in terms of biclique spanned subgraphs is a promising framework for detection of complexes in PPI networks.

Availability

https://github.com/SaraOmranian/PC2P.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

SUBMITTER: Omranian S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8034538 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Identifying protein complexes from protein-protein interaction (PPI) network is one of the most important tasks in proteomics. Existing computational methods try to incorporate a variety of biological evidences to enhance the quality of predicted complexes. However, it is still a challenge to integrate different types of biological information into the complexes discovery process under a unified framework. Recently, attributed network embedding methods have be proved to be remarkably effective in generating vector representations for nodes in the network. In the transformed vector space, both the topological proximity and node attributed affinity between different nodes are preserved. Therefore, such attributed network embedding methods provide us a unified framework to integrate various biological evidences into the protein complexes identification process. RESULTS:In this article, we propose a new method called GANE to predict protein complexes based on Gene Ontology (GO) attributed network embedding. Firstly, it learns the vector representation for each protein from a GO attributed PPI network. Based on the pair-wise vector representation similarity, a weighted adjacency matrix is constructed. Secondly, it uses the clique mining method to generate candidate cores. Consequently, seed cores are obtained by ranking candidate cores based on their densities on the weighted adjacency matrix and removing redundant cores. For each seed core, its attachments are the proteins with correlation score that is larger than a given threshold. The combination of a seed core and its attachment proteins is reported as a predicted protein complex by the GANE algorithm. For performance evaluation, we compared GANE with six protein complex identification methods on five yeast PPI networks. Experimental results showes that GANE performs better than the competing algorithms in terms of different evaluation metrics. CONCLUSIONS:GANE provides a framework that integrate many valuable and different biological information into the task of protein complex identification. The protein vector representation learned from our attributed PPI network can also be used in other tasks, such as PPI prediction and disease gene prediction.

Project description:BackgroundIdentifying protein complexes is crucial to understanding principles of cellular organization and functional mechanisms. As many evidences have indicated that the subgraphs with high density or with high modularity in PPI network usually correspond to protein complexes, protein complexes detection methods based on PPI network focused on subgraph's density or its modularity in PPI network. However, dense subgraphs may have low modularity and subgraph with high modularity may have low density, which results that protein complexes may be subgraphs with low modularity or with low density in the PPI network. As the density-based methods are difficult to mine protein complexes with low density, and the modularity-based methods are difficult to mine protein complexes with low modularity, both two methods have limitation for identifying protein complexes with various density and modularity.ResultsTo identify protein complexes with various density and modularity, including those have low density but high modularity and those have low modularity but high density, we define a novel subgraph's fitness, fρ, as fρ= (density)(ρ*)(modularity)(1-ρ), and propose a novel algorithm, named LF_PIN, to identify protein complexes by expanding seed edges to subgraphs with the local maximum fitness value. Experimental results of LF-PIN in S.cerevisiae show that compared with the results of fitness equal to density (ρ = 1) or equal to modularity (ρ = 0), the LF-PIN identifies known protein complexes more effectively when the fitness value is decided by both density and modularity (0<ρ<1). Compared with the results of seven competing protein complex detection methods (CMC, Core-Attachment, CPM, DPClus, HC-PIN, MCL, and NFC) in S.cerevisiae and E.coli, LF-PIN outperforms other seven methods in terms of matching with known complexes and functional enrichment. Moreover, LF-PIN has better performance in identifying protein complexes with low density or with low modularity.ConclusionsBy considering both the density and the modularity, LF-PIN outperforms other protein complexes detection methods that only consider density or modularity, especially in identifying known protein complexes with low density or low modularity.