Dataset Information

Healthcare Resource Utilization Following a Discharge Against Medical Advice: An Analysis of Commercially Insured Adults.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A discharge against medical advice (DAMA) is associated with adverse health outcomes. Its association with postdischarge healthcare resource utilization (HcRU) outside an inpatient setting is unknown. This information can help us understand how a DAMA may affect healthcare-seeking behavior following a hospital stay. We evaluated the relationship between a DAMA and 30-day postdischarge HcRU.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study uses a 10% random sample of enrollees in the IQVIA PharMetrics^® Plus database. We included individuals aged 18 to 64 years with an inpatient admission during 2007-2015 and continuous insurance coverage. We defined comparison groups as DAMA and routine discharge. Both groups were matched on baseline covariates. We quantified the association between a DAMA and 30-day HcRU, as well as 90-day for sensitivity analysis, with use of generalized linear models for binary outcomes (inpatient readmissions, emergency department [ED] visits) and count outcomes (physician office visits, nonphysician outpatient encounters, prescription drug fills).

Results

Of the 457,530 individuals in the unmatched sample, 2,245 (0.5%) had a DAMA. In the matched sample, a DAMA was positively associated with an ED visit (adjusted odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.90-2.72) but not with an inpatient readmission. There were no differences between groups based on the count outcomes. A DAMA was positively associated with 90-day HcRU (ie, inpatient readmission, ED visit, and prescription drug fills).

Conclusion

The relationship between a DAMA and HcRU varied with the HcRU category and postdischarge time interval. This examination of HcRU in the inpatient and outpatient settings provides important information about outcomes following a DAMA.

SUBMITTER: Gandhi AB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8034675 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe economic burden of commercially insured patients in the United States with treatment-resistant depression and patients with non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder was compared using data from the Optum Clinformatics™ claims database.MethodsPatients 18-63 years on antidepressant treatment between 1/1/13 and 9/30/13, who had no treatment claims for depression 6 months before the index date (first antidepressant dispensing), and who had a major depressive disorder or depression diagnosis within 30 days of the index date, were included. Treatment-resistant depression was defined as receiving 3 antidepressant regimens during 1 major depressive disorder episode. Patients with treatment-resistant depression were matched with patients with non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder at a 1:4 ratio using propensity score matching. The study consisted of 1-year baseline (pre-index) and 2-year follow-up (post index) periods. Cost outcomes were compared using a generalized linear model.Results2,370 treatment-resistant depression and 9,289 non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder patients were included. In year 1 of the follow-up period, compared with non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, patients with treatment-resistant depression had: more emergency department visits (odds ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval = 1.24-1.56); more inpatient hospitalizations (odds ratio = 1.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.46-2.05); longer hospital stays (mean difference vs non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder = 2.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.86-4.86 days); and more total healthcare costs (mean difference vs non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder = US$3,846, 95% confidence interval = $2,855-$4,928). These patterns remained consistent in year 2 of the follow-up period.ConclusionTreatment-resistant depression was associated with higher healthcare resource utilization and costs versus non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder in this commercially insured cohort of patients in the United States.

Project description:IntroductionInsomnia diagnosis has been associated with a significant clinical and economic burden on patients and healthcare systems. This study examined changes in healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs in insomnia patients before and after initiation of suvorexant treatment.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed Optum Clinformatics Data Mart claims data (Jan 2010-Dec 2018). Patients with ≥ 2 insomnia diagnosis claims and ≥ 1 prescription for suvorexant were included. Prevalent and incident insomnia patients were analyzed separately. The change in the trends of HCRU and costs were examined for 12 months before and 12 months after suvorexant initiation. An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was conducted to assess the level and slope changes. Subgroups of patients with mental health comorbidities were examined.ResultsThe study included 18,919 and 5939 patients in the prevalent and incident insomnia cohorts, respectively. For the prevalent cohort, mean (SD) age was 64.5 (14.1) years, 65% were female, 74% had Medicare Advantage coverage, and 61% had a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 1. Characteristics for the incident cohort were similar. The ITS results suggested that the trend for monthly total healthcare cost (THC) was increasing before suvorexant initiation (US$52.51 in the prevalent cohort, $74.93 in incident insomnia cohort), but, after suvorexant initiation, the monthly total cost showed a decreasing trend in both cohorts. The decrease in slope for THC after suvorexant initiation were $72.66 and $112.07 per month in the prevalent and incident cohorts, respectively. The monthly trends in HCRU rates also decreased. The subgroup analysis showed that decreases were 1.5-3 times greater for patients with mental health comorbidities.ConclusionsIn this real-world study, suvorexant initiation was associated with immediate and continued decreases in HCRU and costs in insomnia patients. Further research is needed to understand the effect of suvorexant initiation on direct medical costs as well as costs associated with lost productivity in other real-world settings.

Project description:Background contextOsteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) can lead to severe pain and reduced function and quality-of-life, but the strength of evidence for treatments remains low, particularly in younger populations.PurposeTo determine whether patients with OVFs who received kyphoplasty had different patterns of healthcare utilization compared to propensity-matched patients who did not receive vertebral augmentation.DesignObservational cohort study.Patient sampleWe identified patients with OVFs from 2007 to 2018 in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Databases who received kyphoplasty and compared them to propensity-matched controls who did not receive vertebral augmentation (either kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty).Outcome measuresMajor medical complications within 30 days, fills of opioids from 1-week through 1-month postaugmentation, and spine-related gross covered payments from 3-days postkyphoplasty through 1-year post-OVF.MethodsWe used logistic regression to obtain odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to compare binary outcomes and median analysis to compare continuous outcomes.ResultsOf the 15,197 OVF patients identified, 1,969 (13%) received kyphoplasty and 1,928 (98%) of these were propensity matched to nonaugmented controls. We did not observe differences in the odds of major medical complications within 30 days (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.0 [0.6, 1.8]) but patients who received kyphoplasty were more likely to have filled opioid medications within 30 days (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.3 [1.1, 1.5]) and had greater spine-related gross covered payments (kyphoplasty median [95% CI]: $1,340 [$240, $4,850]; nonaugmented: $7,870 [$7,480, $8,270]; adjusted difference in medians [95% CI]: $260 [$190, $2,050]).ConclusionsIn this cohort of patients <65 years, receipt of kyphoplasty was associated with greater likelihood of opioid fills and somewhat greater spine-related gross covered payments, but no difference in major medical complications. In this retrospective study of administrative data, we did not detect advantages of treatment with kyphoplasty compared with nonaugmentation for any of our outcomes.