Dataset Information

Performance of Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Tests in Morbidly Obese Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent in morbidly obese patients, and fibrosis is an independent predictor of mortality. Noninvasive tests (NITs) are being developed for the detection of advanced fibrosis (AF).

Purpose

To assess the performance of three NITs (NAFLD fibrosis score, NFS, fibrosis-4 index, FIB-4, and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio, APRI), in the identification of AF among morbidly obese patients.

Materials and methods

Patients, who underwent bariatric surgery between 2004 and 2009 and had liver biopsy, were included. Fibrosis stages ≥ F2 and ≥ F3 were defined as significant and AF, respectively. Published and optimal thresholds (Youden index) for NFS, FIB-4 and APRI, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV-NPV), and area under the receiver operator curves (AUROC) were evaluated.

Results

Among 584 patients (mean age 43.3 ± 11.3 years, 21.2% male, 75% white, mean BMI 45.5 ± 8.80), 31.7% had NASH. Stages distributions were F1 = 68.1%, F2 = 16.4%, F3 = 8%, and F4 = 3.2%. At published thresholds, all 3 NITs performed poorly for detection of AF, with AUROC < 0.62. Overall performance at optimal thresholds improved to 0.68, 0.72, and 0.74 for NFS, FIB-4, and APRI, respectively. At optimal thresholds, all tests had good NPV (94.4-95.9%) but low PPV (24.2-32.5%). Combinations of the tests did not improve their performance.

Conclusions

NFS, FIB-4, and APRI fall short to detect advanced fibrosis but valuable for excluding advanced fibrosis. More research is needed to develop new NITs with high positive predictive value.

SUBMITTER: Alqahtani SA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8041679 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe diagnostic performance of the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score (NFS) for advanced fibrosis in lean patients with NAFLD is limited.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the FIB-4 and NFS in lean individuals with NAFLD.Design, setting, and participantsThis diagnostic study included adults with biopsy-proven NAFLD from 6 referral centers in Asia from 1995 to 2019. Cohorts were matched by age and sex between the lean and nonlean groups. All statistical analyses were executed from October 2022 to March 2023.Main outcomes and measuresThe diagnostic performance of the FIB-4 and NFS at the current cutoff for advanced hepatic fibrosis in lean (body mass index [BMI] below 23 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]) and nonlean (BMI above 23) patients were evaluated.ResultsA total of 1501 patients were included in analysis (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [16.4] years); 788 male (52.5%), 115 lean (7.7%), 472 (30.2%) Korean, 821 (48.7%) Japanese, and 341 (21.3%) Taiwanese. Among the age- and sex-matched cohort, the mean (SD) age was 52.3 (15.1) years and 41.2% (47 of 114) were male. The diagnostic performance and areas under the operating characteristic curve of the FIB-4 (lean, 0.807 vs nonlean, 0.743; P = .28) and NFS (lean, 0.790 vs nonlean, 0.755; P = .54) between the 2 groups were comparable in the age- and sex-matched cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the NFS showed increasing and decreasing tendency according to the BMI quartiles (P for trend < .001), while those of the FIB-4 did not (P for trend = .05 and P = .20, respectively). Additionally, although the areas under the operating characteristic curve of the FIB-4 and NFS were not significantly different in the lean group (0.807 vs 0.790; P = .09), the sensitivity of the current NFS cutoff values was lower in the lean group than in that of FIB-4 (54.4% vs 81.8%; P = .03).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, the performance of the FIB-4 and NFS in diagnosing advanced fibrosis did not differ significantly between the 2 groups overall. However, in lean NAFLD, while the sensitivity for diagnosing advanced hepatic fibrosis remained reasonable at the current cutoff level, the sensitivity of NFS at the current cutoff was too low to be an adequate screening tool.