Panels and models for accurate prediction of tumor mutation burden in tumor samples.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Martinez-Perez E
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8044185 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Uterus Corpus Endometrial cancer (UCEC) is the sixth most common malignant tumor worldwide. In this research, we identified diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers to reflect patients' immune microenvironment and prognostic. Various data of UCEC patients from the TCGA database were obtained. Firstly, patients were divided into a high tumor mutation burden (TMB) level group and a low TMB level group according to the level of TMB. Then, differentially expressed miRNAs between the two groups were obtained. LASSO logistic regression analysis was used to construct a diagnostic model to predict the level of TMB. Univariate, multivariate, and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct a prognostic risk signature (PRS) to predict the prognosis of UCEC patients. Twenty-one miRNAs were used to construct a diagnostic model for predicting TMB levels. The AUC values of ROC curves for 21-miRNA-based diagnostic models were 0.911 in the training set, 0.827 in the test set, and 0.878 in the entire set. This diagnostic model showed positive correlation with TMB, PDL1 expression, and the infiltration of immune cells. In addition, three prognostic miRNAs were finally used to construct the PRS. The PRS was related to the expression of multiple immune checkpoints and the infiltration of multiple immune cells. Furthermore, the PRS can also reflect the response to some commonly used chemotherapy regimens. We have established a miRNA-based diagnostic model and a prognostic model that can predict the prognosis of UCEC patients and their response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy, thus providing valuable information on the choice of treatment regimen.
| S-EPMC8806700 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe use of a personalized haplotype-specific genome assembly, rather than an unrelated, mosaic genome like GRCh38, as a reference for detecting the full spectrum of somatic events from cancers has long been advocated but has never been explored in tumor-normal paired samples. Here, we provide the first demonstrated use of de novo assembled personalized genome as a reference for cancer mutation detection and quantifying the effects of the reference genomes on the accuracy of somatic mutation detection.ResultsWe generate de novo assemblies of the first tumor-normal paired genomes, both nuclear and mitochondrial, derived from the same individual with triple negative breast cancer. The personalized genome was chromosomal scale, haplotype phased, and annotated. We demonstrate that it provides individual specific haplotypes for complex regions and medically relevant genes. We illustrate that the personalized genome reference not only improves read alignments for both short-read and long-read sequencing data but also ameliorates the detection accuracy of somatic SNVs and SVs. We identify the equivalent somatic mutation calls between two genome references and uncover novel somatic mutations only when personalized genome assembly is used as a reference.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that use of a personalized genome with individual-specific haplotypes is essential for accurate detection of the full spectrum of somatic mutations in the paired tumor-normal samples. The unique resource and methodology established in this study will be beneficial to the development of precision oncology medicine not only for breast cancer, but also for other cancers.
| S-EPMC9648002 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Though whole exome sequencing (WES) is the gold-standard for measuring tumor mutational burden (TMB), the development of gene-targeted panels enables cost-effective TMB estimation. With the growing number of panels in clinical trials, developing a statistical method to effectively evaluate and compare the performance of different panels is necessary. The mainstream method uses R-squared value to measure the correlation between the panel-based TMB and WES-based TMB. However, the performance of a panel is usually overestimated via R-squared value based on the long-tailed TMB distribution of the dataset. Herein, we propose angular distance, a measurement used to compute the extent of the estimated bias. Our extensive in silico analysis indicates that the R-squared value reaches a plateau after the panel size reaches 0.5 Mb, which does not adequately characterize the performance of the panels. In contrast, the angular distance is still sensitive to the changes in panel sizes when the panel size reaches 6 Mb. In particular, R-squared values between the hypermutation-included dataset and the non-hypermutation dataset differ widely across many cancer types, whereas the angular distances are highly consistent. Therefore, the angular distance is more objective and logical than R-squared value for evaluating the accuracy of TMB estimation for gene-targeted panels.
| S-EPMC8548549 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Tumor mutational burden (TMB), the total number of somatic coding mutations in a tumor, is emerging as a promising biomarker for immunotherapy response in cancer patients. TMB can be quantitated by a number of NGS-based sequencing technologies. Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) allows comprehensive measurement of TMB and is considered the gold standard. However, to date WES remains confined to research settings, due to high cost of the large genomic space sequenced. In the clinical setting, instead, targeted enrichment panels (gene panels) of various genomic sizes are emerging as the routine technology for TMB assessment. This stimulated the development of various methods for panel-based TMB quantification, and prompted the multiplication of studies assessing whether TMB can be confidently estimated from the smaller genomic space sampled by gene panels. In this review, we inventory the collection of available gene panels tested for this purpose, illustrating their technical specifications and describing their accuracy and clinical value in TMB assessment. Moreover, we highlight how various experimental, platform-related or methodological variables, as well as bioinformatic pipelines, influence panel-based TMB quantification. The lack of harmonization in panel-based TMB quantification, of adequate methods to convert TMB estimates across different panels and of robust predictive cutoffs, currently represents one of the main limitations to adopt TMB as a biomarker in clinical practice. This overview on the heterogeneous landscape of panel-based TMB quantification aims at providing a context to discuss common standards and illustrates the strong need of further validation and consolidation studies for the clinical interpretation of panel-based TMB values.
| S-EPMC6631597 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe development and prognosis of HCC involve complex molecular mechanisms, which affect the effectiveness of its treatment strategies. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is related to the efficacy of immunotherapy, but the prognostic role of TMB-related genes in HCC has not yet been determined clearly.ObjectivesIn this study, we identified TMB-specific genes with good prognostic value to build diagnostic and prognostic models and provide guidance for the treatment of HCC patients.MethodsWeighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was applied to identify the TMB-specific genes. And LASSO method and Cox regression were used in establishing the prognostic model.ResultsThe prognostic model based on SMG5 and MRPL9 showed patients with higher prognostic risk had a remarkedly poorer survival probability than their counterparts with lower prognostic risk in both a TCGA cohort (P < 0.001, HR = 1.93) and an ICGC cohort (P < 0.001, HR = 3.58). In addition, higher infiltrating fractions of memory B cells, M0 macrophages, neutrophils, activated memory CD4 + T cells, follicular helper T cells and regulatory T cells and higher expression of B7H3, CTLA4, PD1, and TIM3 were present in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (P < 0.05). Patients with high prognostic risk had higher resistance to some chemotherapy and targeted drugs, such as methotrexate, vinblastine and erlotinib, than those with low prognostic risk (P < 0.05). And a diagnostic model considering two genes was able to accurately distinguish patients with HCC from normal samples and those with dysplastic nodules. In addition, knockdown of SMG5 and MRPL9 was determined to significantly inhibit cell proliferation and migration in HCC.ConclusionOur study helps to select patients suitable for chemotherapy, targeted drugs and immunotherapy and provide new ideas for developing treatment strategies to improve disease outcomes in HCC patients.
| S-EPMC8463909 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an increasingly important biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Recent publications have described strong association between high TMB and objective response to mono- and combination immunotherapies in several cancer types. Existing methods to estimate TMB require large amount of input DNA, which may not always be available. Methods:In this study, we develop a method to estimate TMB using the Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load (TML) Assay with 20 ng of DNA, and we characterize the performance of this method on various formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) research samples of several cancer types. We measure the analytical performance of TML workflow through comparison with control samples with known truth, and we compare performance with an orthogonal method which uses matched normal sample to remove germline variants. We perform whole exome sequencing (WES) on a batch of FFPE samples and compare the WES TMB values with TMB estimates by the TML assay. Results:In-silico analyses demonstrated the Oncomine TML panel has sufficient genomic coverage to estimate somatic mutations with a strong correlation (r2=0.986) to WES. Further, in silico prediction using WES data from three separate cohorts and comparing with a subset of the WES overlapping with the TML panel, confirmed the ability to stratify responders and non-responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors with high statistical significance. We found the rate of somatic mutations with the TML assay on cell lines and control samples were similar to the known truth. We verified the performance of germline filtering using only a tumor sample in comparison to a matched tumor-normal experimental design to remove germline variants. We compared TMB estimates by the TML assay with that from WES on a batch of FFPE research samples and found high correlation (r2=0.83). We found biologically interesting tumorigenesis signatures on FFPE research samples of colorectal cancer (CRC), lung, and melanoma origin. Further, we assessed TMB on a cohort of FFPE research samples including lung, colon, and melanoma tumors to discover the biologically relevant range of TMB values. Conclusions:These results show that the TML assay targeting a 1.7-Mb genomic footprint can accurately predict TMB values that are comparable to the WES. The TML assay workflow incorporates a simple workflow using the Ion GeneStudio S5 System. Further, the AmpliSeq chemistry allows the use of low input DNA to estimate mutational burden from FFPE samples. This TMB assay enables scalable, robust research into immuno-oncology biomarkers with scarce samples.
| S-EPMC6249619 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a biomarker frequently reported by clinical laboratories, which is derived by quantifying of the number of single nucleotide or indel variants (mutations) identified by next-generation sequencing of tumors. TMB values can inform prognosis or predict the response of a patient's tumor to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Methods for the calculation of TMB are not standardized between laboratories, with significant variables being the gene content of the panels sequenced and the inclusion or exclusion of synonymous variants in the calculations. The impact of these methodological differences has not been investigated and the concordance of reported TMB values between laboratories is unknown. METHODS:Sequence variant lists from more than 9000 tumors of various types were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Variant lists were filtered to include only appropriate variant types (ie, non-synonymous only or synonymous and non-synonymous variants) within the genes found in five commonly used targeted solid tumor gene panels as well as an in-house gene panel. Calculated TMB was paired with corresponding overall survival (OS) data of each patient. RESULTS:Regression analysis indicates high concordance of TMB as derived from the examined panels. TMB derived from panels was consistently and significantly lower than that derived from a whole exome. TMB, as derived from whole exome or the examined panels, showed a significant correlation with OS in the examined data. CONCLUSIONS:TMB derived from the examined gene panels was analytically equivalent between panels, but not between panels and whole-exome sequencing. Correlation between TMB and OS is significant if TMB method-specific cut-offs are used. These results suggest that TMB values, as derived from the gene panels examined, are analytically and prognostically equivalent.
| S-EPMC7174068 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is gaining attention as a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated the status of TMB in primary and liver metastatic lesions in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In addition, the status of TMB in primary and liver metastatic lesions was inferred by radiogenomics on the basis of computed tomography (CT) images. The study population included 24 CRC patients with liver metastases. DNA was extracted from primary and liver metastatic lesions obtained from the patients and TMB values were evaluated by next-generation sequencing. The TMB value was considered high when it equaled to or exceeded 10/100 Mb. Radiogenomic analysis of TMB was performed by machine learning using CT images and the construction of prediction models. In 7 out of 24 patients (29.2%), the TMB status differed between the primary and liver metastatic lesions. Radiogenomic analysis was performed to predict whether TMB status was high or low. The maximum values for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.732 and 0.812 for primary CRC and CRC with liver metastasis, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the constructed models for TMB status discordance were 0.857, 0.600, and 0.682, respectively. Our results suggested that accurate inference of the TMB status is possible using radiogenomics. Therefore, radiogenomics could facilitate the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with CRC in the clinical setting.
| S-EPMC8748253 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Microbiome biomarker discovery for patient diagnosis, prognosis, and risk evaluation is attracting broad interest. Selected groups of microbial features provide signatures that characterize host disease states such as cancer or cardio-metabolic diseases. Yet, the current predictive models stemming from machine learning still behave as black boxes and seldom generalize well. Their interpretation is challenging for physicians and biologists, which makes them difficult to trust and use routinely in the physician-patient decision-making process. Novel methods that provide interpretability and biological insight are needed. Here, we introduce "predomics", an original machine learning approach inspired by microbial ecosystem interactions that is tailored for metagenomics data. It discovers accurate predictive signatures and provides unprecedented interpretability. The decision provided by the predictive model is based on a simple, yet powerful score computed by adding, subtracting, or dividing cumulative abundance of microbiome measurements. Tested on >100 datasets, we demonstrate that predomics models are simple and highly interpretable. Even with such simplicity, they are at least as accurate as state-of-the-art methods. The family of best models, discovered during the learning process, offers the ability to distil biological information and to decipher the predictability signatures of the studied condition. In a proof-of-concept experiment, we successfully predicted body corpulence and metabolic improvement after bariatric surgery using pre-surgery microbiome data. Predomics is a new algorithm that helps in providing reliable and trustworthy diagnostic decisions in the microbiome field. Predomics is in accord with societal and legal requirements that plead for an explainable artificial intelligence approach in the medical field.
| S-EPMC7062144 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEndometrial Cancer (EC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies that affect the female population globally. In the context of immunotherapy, Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) in the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) subtype of this cancer holds promise as a viable therapeutic target.MethodsWe devised a method known as NEM-TIE to forecast the TMB status of patients with endometrial cancer. This approach utilized a combination of the Network Evolution Model, Transfer Information Entropy, Clique Percolation (CP) methodology, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification. To construct the Network Evolution Model, we employed an adjacency matrix that utilized transfer information entropy to assess the information gain between nodes of radiomic-clinical features. Subsequently, using the CP algorithm, we unearthed potentially pivotal modules in the Network Evolution Model. Finally, the SVM classifier extracted essential features from the module set.ResultsUpon analyzing the importance of modules, we discovered that the dependence count energy in tumor volumes-of-interest holds immense significance in distinguishing TMB statuses among patients with endometrial cancer. Using the 13 radiomic-clinical features extracted via NEM-TIE, we demonstrated that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) in the test set is 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.00), surpassing the performance of existing techniques such as the mRMR and Laplacian methods.ConclusionsOur study proposed the NEM-TIE method as a means to identify the TMB status of patients with endometrial cancer. The integration of radiomic-clinical data utilizing the NEM-TIE method may offer a novel technology for supplementary diagnosis.
| S-EPMC10388464 | biostudies-literature