Dataset Information

Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, early detection and survival in a privately insured US cohort.

ABSTRACT:

Background/aims

Semiannual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is recommended in patients with cirrhosis; however, recent studies have raised questions over its utility. We investigated the impact of surveillance on early detection and survival in a nationally representative database.

Methods

We included patients with cirrhosis and HCC from the Optum database (2001-2015) with >6 months of follow-up between cirrhosis and HCC diagnoses. Surveillance adherence was defined as proportion of time covered (PTC), with each 6-month period after abdominal imaging defined as 'covered'. To determine the association between surveillance and mortality, we compared PTC between fatal and non-fatal HCC.

Results

Of 1001 patients with cirrhosis and HCC, 256 died with median follow-up 30 months. Median PTC by any imaging was greater in early-stage vs late-stage HCC (43.6% vs 37.4%, P = .003) and non-fatal vs fatal HCC (40.8% vs 34.3%, P = .001). In multivariable analyses, each 10% increase in PTC was associated with increased early HCC detection (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.12) and decreased mortality (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90-1.00). On subgroup analysis, PTC by CT/MRI was associated with early tumour detection and decreased mortality; however, PTC by ultrasound was only associated with early detection but not decreased mortality. These findings were robust across sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

In a US cohort of privately insured HCC patients, PTC by any imaging modality was associated with increased early detection and decreased mortality. Continued evaluation of HCC surveillance strategies and effectiveness is warranted.

SUBMITTER: Chen VL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8047296 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsNon-invasive laboratory-based fibrosis indices have been proposed as a tool for population-based screening for advanced fibrosis. We aimed to examine the performance of fibrosis indices at the time of and prior to cirrhosis diagnosis.MethodsWe included adult patients with cirrhosis diagnosis codes in a privately insured database (Optum) from 2010-2018 with 1:4 birth year-matched controls without cirrhosis diagnosis codes. We analyzed aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) up to 30 months prior to the entry of cirrhosis diagnosis codes. Cut-offs of <1 and ≥2 were used for APRI and <1.3 and ≥2.67 were used for FIB-4.ResultsWe included 10,650 patients with cirrhosis (median age 62 years), who were predominantly white (57.8%) and male (51.9%). The most common etiologies of cirrhosis were non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (23.8%), hepatitis C (23.0%), and alcohol-related liver disease (20.5%). At the time of cirrhosis diagnosis (±3 months), 9.3% of patients with cirrhosis had APRI ≥2 and 41.3% had a FIB-4 ≥2.67 compared to 1.2% and 8.9% in control patients, respectively. In the periods spanning 3-12, 12-21, and 21-30 months prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, APRI was ≥2 in 9.4%, 6.6%, and 6.5% of patients, respectively; FIB-4 was ≥2.67 in 42.1%, 37.1%, and 34.3% of patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of APRI at the time of cirrhosis diagnosis were 9.3% and 98.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of FIB-4 were 41.3% and 91.0%, respectively. Lower cut-off values for APRI and FIB-4 showed similar performance.ConclusionsExisting non-invasive fibrosis makers are suboptimal when used for advanced fibrosis identification, missing over half of patients with cirrhosis at the time of and prior to clinical diagnosis.Impact and implicationsCommonly available laboratory-based indices, including APRI and FIB-4, have been proposed to rule in or rule out advanced fibrosis in the general population. In a study of a large privately insured cohort from the US, FIB-4 and APRI were not sufficient for screening for advanced fibrosis at the time of or prior to clinical diagnosis. While performance for screening out advanced fibrosis was better, a significant percentage of patients with cirrhosis have lab indices below threshold values. Future studies to develop laboratory-based algorithms to help stratify liver fibrosis for population-based screening are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundSurveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has level I evidence among patients with hepatitis B but only level II evidence in patients with cirrhosis. This lack of randomized data has spurred questions regarding the utility of HCC surveillance in this patient population; however, lack of randomized data does not equate to a lack of data supporting the efficacy of surveillance. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of HCC surveillance on early stage tumor detection, receipt of curative therapy, and overall survival in patients with cirrhosis.Methods and findingsWe performed a systematic literature review using Medline from January 1990 through January 2014 and a search of national meeting abstracts from 2009-2012. Two investigators identified studies that reported rates of early stage tumor detection, curative treatment receipt, or survival, stratified by HCC surveillance status, among patients with cirrhosis. Both investigators independently extracted data on patient populations, study methods, and results using standardized forms. Pooled odds ratios, according to HCC surveillance status, were calculated for each outcome using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random effects model. We identified 47 studies with 15,158 patients, of whom 6,284 (41.4%) had HCC detected by surveillance. HCC surveillance was associated with improved early stage detection (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.80-2.37) and curative treatment rates (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.99-2.52). HCC surveillance was associated with significantly prolonged survival (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.67-2.17), which remained significant in the subset of studies adjusting for lead-time bias. Limitations of current data included many studies having insufficient duration of follow-up to assess survival and the majority not adjusting for liver function or lead-time bias.ConclusionsHCC surveillance is associated with significant improvements in early tumor detection, receipt of curative therapy, and overall survival in patients with cirrhosis. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Project description:BackgroundPeople living with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) experience motor, sensory and autonomic impairments that cause musculoskeletal disorders following the injury and that progress throughout lifetime. The range and severity of issues are largely dependent on level and completeness of the injury and preserved function.ObjectiveHigh risk of developing musculoskeletal morbidities among individuals after sustaining a traumatic SCI is well known in the clinical setting, however, there is a severe lack of evidence in literature. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of and adjusted hazards for musculoskeletal morbidities among adults with and without SCIs.MethodsPrivately-insured beneficiaries were included if they had an ICD-9-CM diagnostic code for SCI (n = 9081). Adults without SCI were also included (n = 1,474,232). Incidence estimates of common musculoskeletal morbidities (e.g., osteoporosis, sarcopenia, osteoarthritis, fractures, etc.) were compared at 5-years of enrollment. Survival models were used to quantify unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for incident musculoskeletal morbidities.ResultsAdults living with traumatic SCIs had a higher incidence of any musculoskeletal morbidities (82.4% vs. 47.5%) as compared to adults without SCI, and differences were to a clinically meaningful extent. Survival models demonstrated that adults with SCI had a greater fully-adjusted hazard for any musculoskeletal morbidity (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.41; 95%CI: 2.30, 2.52), and all musculoskeletal disorders, and ranged from HR: 1.26 (1.14, 1.39) for rheumatoid arthritis to HR: 7.02 (6.58, 7.49) for pathologic fracture.ConclusionsAdults with SCIs have a significantly higher incidence of and risk for common musculoskeletal morbidities, as compared to adults without SCIs. Efforts are needed to facilitate the development of improved clinical screening algorithms and early interventions to reduce risk of musculoskeletal disease onset/progression in this higher risk population.

Project description:ImportanceHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is underused in clinical practice, which may be owing to patient and clinician barriers.ObjectiveTo characterize HCC surveillance barriers and associations with clinical outcomes in a multicenter cohort of patients with cirrhosis.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 5 medical centers in the United States. Patients with cirrhosis and newly diagnosed HCC treated from 2014 to 2018 were included. Data were analyzed from June 2021 to February 2022.ExposureSurveillance completion in the 36-month period prior to HCC diagnosis.Main outcomes and measuresSurveillance receipt was classified as semiannual, annual, or no surveillance. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with semiannual surveillance. We conducted multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses to characterize associations between surveillance completion with curative treatment and overall survival.ResultsA total 629 eligible patients (median [IQR] age, 63.6 [56.2-71.0] years; 491 [78.1%] men) were assessed, including 7 American Indian or Alaska Native patients (1.1%), 14 Asian patients (2.2), 176 Black patients (28.0%), 86 Hispanic patients (13.1%), and 340 White patients (54.1%). Nearly two-thirds of the cohort had no surveillance prior to HCC diagnosis (mean [range by site] 63.7% [37.9%-80.4%]), with a mean (range by site) of 14.0% (5.3%-33.3%) of patients having received semiannual surveillance and 22.3% (14.3%-28.8%) of patients having received annual surveillance. The most common reasons for no surveillance were lack of surveillance orders or nonadherence (mean [range by site], 82.4% [66.7%-92.4%], although a mean (range by site) of 17.6% (10.2%-22.1%) of patients had unrecognized cirrhosis at HCC presentation. Semiannual surveillance was associated with hepatitis B infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.06 [95% CI, 1.24-7.23]) and inversely associated with Black race (OR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.20-0.80]) and lack of cirrhosis recognition (OR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.46]). Semiannual HCC surveillance was significantly associated with curative treatment receipt (OR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.60-4.70]) but not overall survival (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.55-1.18]).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of patients with cirrhosis, HCC surveillance was underused in more than 80% of patients and associated with failures across the screening process. Dedicated programs to improve cirrhosis detection and HCC surveillance attainment are needed.

Project description:Suboptimal adherence to guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance among high-risk patients is a persistent problem with substantial detriment to patient outcomes. While patients cite cost as a barrier to surveillance receipt, the financial burden they experience due to surveillance has not been examined. We conducted a retrospective administrative claims study to assess HCC surveillance use and associated costs in a US cohort of insured patients without cirrhosis but with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, monitored in routine clinical practice. Of 6831 patients (1122 on antiviral treatment, 5709 untreated), only 39.3% and 51.3% had received any abdominal imaging after 6 and 12 months, respectively, and patients were up to date with HCC surveillance guidelines for only 28% of the follow-up time. Completion of surveillance was substantially higher at 6 and 12 months among treated patients (51.7% and 69.6%, respectively) compared with untreated patients (36.9% and 47.6%, respectively) (p < 0.001). In adjusted models, treated patients were more likely than untreated patients to receive surveillance (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-2.01, p < 0.001), and the proportion of those up to date with surveillance was 9.7% higher (95% CI 6.26-13.07, p < 0.001). Mean total and patient-paid daily surveillance-related costs ranged from $99 (ultrasound) to $334 (magnetic resonance imaging), and mean annual patient costs due to lost productivity for surveillance-related outpatient visits ranged from $93 (using the federal minimum wage) to $321 (using the Bureau of Labor Statistics wage). Conclusion: Use of current HCC surveillance strategies was low across patients with HBV infection, and surveillance was associated with substantial patient financial burden. These data highlight an urgent need for accessible and easy-to-implement surveillance strategies with sufficient sensitivity and specificity for early HCC detection.

Project description:Background & aimsSociety guidelines differ in their recommendations for surveillance to detect early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. We compared the performance of surveillance imaging, with or without alpha fetoprotein (AFP), for early detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis.MethodsTwo reviewers searched MEDLINE and SCOPUS from January 1990 through August 2016 to identify published sensitivity and specificity of surveillance strategies for overall and early detection of HCC. Pooled estimates were calculated and compared using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random effects model. The study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines.ResultsThirty-two studies (comprising 13,367 patients) characterized sensitivity of imaging with or without AFP measurement for detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Ultrasound detected any stage HCC with 84% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-92%), but early-stage HCC with only 47% sensitivity (95% CI 33%-61%). In studies comparing ultrasound with vs without AFP measurement, ultrasound detected any stage HCC with a lower level of sensitivity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (relative risk [RR] 0.88; 95% CI 0.83-0.93) and early-stage HCC with a lower level of sensitivity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.93). However, ultrasound alone detected HCC with a higher level of specificity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.09). Ultrasound with vs without AFP detected early-stage HCC with 63% sensitivity (95% CI 48%-75%) and 45% sensitivity (95% CI 30%-62%), respectively (P = .002). Only 4 studies evaluated computed tomography or magnetic resonance image-based surveillance, which detected HCC with 84% sensitivity (95% CI 70%-92%).ConclusionsWe found ultrasound alone has a low sensitivity to detect early stage HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Addition of AFP to ultrasound significantly increases sensitivity of early HCC detection in clinical practice.