Dataset Information

Assessing Public Interest Based on Wikipedia's Most Visited Medical Articles During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: Search Trends Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In the current era of widespread access to the internet, we can monitor public interest in a topic via information-targeted web browsing. We sought to provide direct proof of the global population's altered use of Wikipedia medical knowledge resulting from the new COVID-19 pandemic and related global restrictions.

Objective

We aimed to identify temporal search trends and quantify changes in access to Wikipedia Medicine Project articles that were related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of medical articles across nine language versions of Wikipedia and country-specific statistics for registered COVID-19 deaths. The observed patterns were compared to a forecast model of Wikipedia use, which was trained on data from 2015 to 2019. The model comprehensively analyzed specific articles and similarities between access count data from before (ie, several years prior) and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Wikipedia articles that were linked to those directly associated with the pandemic were evaluated in terms of degrees of separation and analyzed to identify similarities in access counts. We assessed the correlation between article access counts and the number of diagnosed COVID-19 cases and deaths to identify factors that drove interest in these articles and shifts in public interest during the subsequent phases of the pandemic.

Results

We observed a significant (P<.001) increase in the number of entries on Wikipedia medical articles during the pandemic period. The increased interest in COVID-19-related articles temporally correlated with the number of global COVID-19 deaths and consistently correlated with the number of region-specific COVID-19 deaths. Articles with low degrees of separation were significantly similar (P<.001) in terms of access patterns that were indicative of information-seeking patterns.

Conclusions

The analysis of Wikipedia medical article popularity could be a viable method for epidemiologic surveillance, as it provides important information about the reasons behind public attention and factors that sustain public interest in the long term. Moreover, Wikipedia users can potentially be directed to credible and valuable information sources that are linked with the most prominent articles.

SUBMITTER: Chrzanowski J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8049630 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn the absence of vaccines and established treatments, nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are fundamental tools to control coronavirus disease (COVID-19) transmission. NPIs require public interest to be successful. In the United States, there is a lack of published research on the factors that influence public interest in COVID-19. Using Google Trends, we examined the US level of public interest in COVID-19 and how it correlated to testing and with other countries.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine how public interest in COVID-19 in the United States changed over time and the key factors that drove this change, such as testing. US public interest in COVID-19 was compared to that in countries that have been more successful in their containment and mitigation strategies.MethodsIn this retrospective study, Google Trends was used to analyze the volume of internet searches within the United States relating to COVID-19, focusing on dates between December 31, 2019, and March 24, 2020. The volume of internet searches related to COVID-19 was compared to that in other countries.ResultsThroughout January and February 2020, there was limited search interest in COVID-19 within the United States. Interest declined for the first 21 days of February. A similar decline was seen in geographical regions that were later found to be experiencing undetected community transmission in February. Between March 9 and March 12, 2020, there was a rapid rise in search interest. This rise in search interest was positively correlated with the rise of positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 (6.3, 95% CI -2.9 to 9.7; P<.001). Within the United States, it took 52 days for search interest to rise substantially after the first positive case; in countries with more successful outbreak control, search interest rose in less than 15 days.ConclusionsContainment and mitigation strategies require public interest to be successful. The initial level of COVID-19 public interest in the United States was limited and even decreased during a time when containment and mitigation strategies were being established. A lack of public interest in COVID-19 existed in the United States when containment and mitigation policies were in place. Based on our analysis, it is clear that US policy makers need to develop novel methods of communicating COVID-19 public health initiatives.

Project description:BackgroundMedical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus contribute towards efficient searching of biomedical information. However, insufficient coverage of specific fields and inaccuracies in the indexing of articles can lead to bias during literature retrieval.ObjectivesThis meta-research study aimed to assess the use of 'Pharmaceutical Services' MeSH terms in studies evaluating the effect of pharmacists' interventions.MethodsAn updated systematic search (Jan-2022) to gather meta-analyses comparing pharmacists' interventions vs. other forms of care was performed. All MeSH terms allocated to the MEDLINE record of each primary study included in the selected meta-analyses were systematically extracted. Terms from the 'Pharmaceutical Services' branch, including its descendants, as well as other 26 pharmacy-specific MeSH terms were identified. The assignment of these terms as a 'Major MeSH' was also evaluated. Descriptive statistics and social network analyses to evaluate the co-occurrence of the MeSH terms in the articles were conducted. Sensitivity analyses including only meta-analyses with declared objectives mentioning the words 'pharmacist' or 'pharmacy' were performed (SPSS v.24.0).ResultsOverall, 138 meta-analyses including 2012 primary articles were evaluated. A median of 15 [IQR 12-18] MeSH terms were assigned per article with a slight positive time-trend (Spearman rho = 0.193; p < 0.001). Only 36.6% (n = 736/2012) and 58.1% (n = 338/1099) of studies were indexed with one MeSH term from the 'Pharmaceutical Services' branch in the overall and sensitivity analyses, respectively. In <20% of cases, these terms were a 'Major MeSH'. The pharmacy-specific term 'Pharmacists' was the most frequently used, yet in only 27.8% and 47.7% of articles in the original and sensitivity analyses, respectively. Social networks showed a weak association between pharmacy-specific and 'Pharmaceutical services' branch MeSH terms.ConclusionsThe availability of a 'Pharmaceutical services' branch hierarchic tree and further pharmacy-specific MeSH terms incorporated to the MeSH thesaurus in the past years is not related with accurate indexing of articles.

Project description:BackgroundFrom the beginning of 2020, the world was plunged into a pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). People increasingly searched for information related to COVID-19 on internet websites. The Baidu Index is a data sharing platform. The main data provided is the search index (SI), which represents the frequency that keywords are used in searches.MethodsJanuary 9, 2020 is an important date for the outbreak of COVID-19 in China. We compared the changes of SI before and after for 7 keywords, including "fever", "cough", "nausea", "vomiting", "abdominal pain", "diarrhea", "constipation". The slope and peak values of SI change curves are compared. Ten provinces in China were selected for a separate analysis, including Beijing, Gansu, Guangdong, Guangxi, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Sichuan, Shanghai, Xinjiang, Tibet. The change of SI was analyzed separately, and the correlation between SI and demographic and economic data was analyzed.ResultsDuring period I, from January 9 to January 25, 2020, the average daily increase (ADI) of the SI for "diarrhea" was lower than that for "cough" (889.47 vs. 1,799.12, F=11.43, P=0.002). In period II, from January 25 to April 8, 2020, the average daily decrease (ADD) of the SI for "diarrhea" was significantly lower than that for "cough", with statistical significance (cough, 191.40 vs. 441.44, F=68.66, P<0.001). The mean SI after January 9, 2020 (pre-SI) was lower than that before January 9, 2020 (post-SI) (fever, 2,616.41±116.92 vs. 3,724.51±867.81, P<0.001; cough, 3,260.04±308.43 vs. 5,590.66±874.25, P<0.001; diarrhea, 4,128.80±200.82 vs. 4,423.55±1,058.01, P<0.001). The pre-SI mean was correlated with population (P=0.004, R=0.813) and gross domestic product (GDP) (P<0.001, R=0.966). The post-SI peak was correlated with population (P=0.007, R=0.789), GDP (P=0.005, R=0.804), and previously confirmed cases (PCC) (P=0.03, R=0.670). The growth rate of the SI was correlated with the post-SI peak (P=0.04, R=0.649), PCC (P=0.003, R=0.835).ConclusionsDiarrhea was of widespread concern in all provinces before and after the COVID-19 outbreak and may be associated with novel coronavirus infection. Internet big data can reflect the public's concern about diseases, which is of great significance for the study of the epidemiological characteristics of diseases.